On 6/25/07, C. Scott Ananian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also, I think we've discussed shipping binary
> diffs rather than git's integral blobs,
Git can also use "thin" packs which are basically binary diffs. So you
_can_ use the git machinery for distributing upgrades with truly
minimal bw usag
On 6/24/07, Ivan Krstić <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I should have a concrete spec ready for discussion later today.
I will wait with bated breath. =)
Some concrete concerns -- I've got some answers to these, but I'll try
to just present the questions at this point:
a) Robustness -- what can br
C. Scott Ananian wrote:
> Has this already been discussed in more depth off-list?
To some degree. I should have a concrete spec ready for discussion later
today.
--
Ivan Krstić <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GPG: 0x147C722D
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.la
In the weekend I just read about Alex' plan for XO in-field upgrades.
The mailing list message is here:
http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/devel/2007-June/005381.html
I think the proposal deserves more discussion; in particular there are
some interactions with vserver and copy-on-write, as well a
