Create CRC file

2007-08-14 Thread Juliano Bittencourt


Hi,

I need some help to create the crc file of the OS image. I created a 
customized image file for the trial school in Porto Alegre. But now I'm 
having problems trying to figure out how to create the crc file.
Any help will be appreciated.


___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: Create CRC file

2007-08-14 Thread Mitch Bradley
Juliano Bittencourt wrote:
 Hi,

 I need some help to create the crc file of the OS image. I created a 
 customized image file for the trial school in Porto Alegre. But now I'm 
 having problems trying to figure out how to create the crc file.
 Any help will be appreciated.
   

git clone git://git.fedoraproject.org/git/pilgrim
cd pilgrim/crcimg
make
./crcimg myfile.img

Output is in myfile.crc






 ___
 Devel mailing list
 Devel@lists.laptop.org
 http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
   

___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: Does sugar web browser support extensions?

2007-08-14 Thread Noah Kantrowitz
If you mean normal Firefox add-ons. It does not. We use a simpler  
core called XULRunner. It does support extensions of a sort using  
PyXPCom, though I don't (yet) know much about those.

--Noah

On Aug 14, 2007, at 3:00 PM, Kleber Infante wrote:

 Hi all,

 I saw in a post that Sugar web browser does not support extensions.  
 Is that true?
 If it´s true, what can be done?

 I would like to know how to install an extension in XO browser. I  
 wanna try to port an Firefox extension to sugar browser.

 thanks
 ___
 Devel mailing list
 Devel@lists.laptop.org
 http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel

___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: Does sugar web browser support extensions?

2007-08-14 Thread Samuel Klein
what was the reason not to support firefox addons again?
firefox runs smoothly on my B4... and it's pretty great to have access
to Google Gears, for instance.

SJ

On 8/14/07, Noah Kantrowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 If you mean normal Firefox add-ons. It does not. We use a simpler
 core called XULRunner. It does support extensions of a sort using
 PyXPCom, though I don't (yet) know much about those.

 --Noah

 On Aug 14, 2007, at 3:00 PM, Kleber Infante wrote:

  Hi all,
 
  I saw in a post that Sugar web browser does not support extensions.
  Is that true?
  If it´s true, what can be done?
 
  I would like to know how to install an extension in XO browser. I
  wanna try to port an Firefox extension to sugar browser.
 
  thanks
  ___
  Devel mailing list
  Devel@lists.laptop.org
  http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel

 ___
 Devel mailing list
 Devel@lists.laptop.org
 http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel

___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: Teleconference information for software status meeting (today, 21:00 EDT Boston

2007-08-14 Thread Chris Ball
System software meeting minutes, 2007-08-14:

Joel Stanley, Bernando Innocenti, Mitch, Bryan, Luna, Richard Smith,
Jim, Jordan, Andres, Scott, Marcelo, Javier, Chris Ball

Status:
---

Wireless resume problems:
  We have firmware from Javier that appears to work, but we don't
  understand the root cause.  cjb will run suspend/resume tests overnight.

  (The short version -- the bug is exhibited when the wireless module
  sees traffic inbetween the host sending a HOSTSLEEP command and the
  module returning an ACK.  The bandaid fix is to disable the radio
  inbetween the two.  There still exists an unresolved race condition,
  probably in either the wireless hardware or firmware.)

Joel Stanley, Power measurement:
  520mW savings by turning the DCON/video off all the way, still
  investigating.
   
Chris Ball, Tinderbox:
  Added power measurement, suspend/resume tests, memory use tracking.
  
Richard Smith, C-build status update:
  pre-C build has happened, 12 machines.  Remainder of the build is
  waiting on batteries to clear customs; supposedly happened a few hours
  ago, so we'll get real C build machines today.  Audio doesn't work;
  probably the same lack of firmware recognition that happened at B4.

  Scott:  Is the write-protect (WP) bit being set in the mfg-data at Quanta?
  Richard:  Will check, think so.
  
Scott, activation:
  Waiting on a real activation server from Ivan, and then can get real
  crypto.  Worked out the key format with Ivan, Michael and Mitch.
  Jim:  Are the machines' manufacturing data going to our server now?
  Richard:  No, that happens right before shipping.

Scott, upgrades:
  Has a specification, waiting for feedback, then implement.

Bugs with action items:
---

#1396 -- We're waiting on the problem with keyboard repeat events.
* AI: Richard to get us a release firmware with this patched.

#1500 -- Need public key for mfg-data.
* AI: Jim to talk to Noah/Ivan to understand why we still don't
  have the public keys generated and signing working yet.

#1547 -- Decide frame buffer depth.
* AI: cjb/bernie to performance-test color depth change.

#1748 -- USB key upgrades currently disabled in USB autoreinstall
* AI: cscott to enable them.

#2184 -- OHM idleness detection isn't working
* AI: jg and cjb to meet and decide what OHM should do for Trial-3,
  mail the result to Richard Hughes and [EMAIL PROTECTED]

#2237 -- Need to find the best DCON write combination for power-savings
* AI: Joel to do so and pass on to Andres to implement.


- Chris.
-- 
Chris Ball   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: Draft manifest format specification.

2007-08-14 Thread Mitch Bradley
Albert Cahalan wrote:

 For linking
 within a bundle, the easy answer is to STOP USING ZIP. At least
 allow a standard Linux archiver (tar, cpio, or pax) as an alternative
 to that crufty old DOS archiver.

zip is younger than either tar or cpio, so old is an invalid 
criticism.  And I reject the assertion that, just because it came from 
the DOS world, therefore it must be crufty.  That is just us-vs-them 
prejudice.

Personally, I think that the zip archive format is quite well designed.  
Granted, it doesn't support all the detailed semantics of Unix 
filesystems, but it does a very good job of representing a 
tree-structured hierarchy of files.

___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel