On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 20:23:25 -0600
Dennis Gilmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 17 December 2007, Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
> > On 12/17/07 20:42, Marcus Leech wrote:
> > > So, things like "find" and "cpio" were only listed as dependencies of
> > > mkinitrd, and not in
> > > any other p
On Tuesday 18 December 2007, Build Announcer Script wrote:
> http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/update.1/build659/
The url is http://pilgrim.laptop.org/~pilgrim/olpc/streams/update.1/build659/
> -Memorize-21.xo
> +Memorize-22.xo
> -Paint-12.xo
> +Paint-13.xo
> -Record-44.xo
> +Record-
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/update.1/build659/
-Memorize-21.xo
+Memorize-22.xo
-Paint-12.xo
+Paint-13.xo
-Record-44.xo
+Record-47.xo
-cairo.i386 0:1.4.10-1.fc7
+cairo.i386 0:1.4.12-1.fc7
-hulahop.i386 0:0.3-1.olpc2
+hulahop.i386 0:0.4.0-1.olpc2
-olpcrd.i386 0:0.36-0
+olpcrd.i386
On one laptop, it associates fine with a school server
On a second laptop, it refuses to accept the DHCP offer from the
school server. Multiple attempts (using Sugar) failed.
On both laptops, it was installed using copy-nand.
Both laptops were ten feet from the school server.
wad
On Dec 17, 20
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build1440/
+cpio.i386 0:2.6-28.fc7
+dmraid.i386 0:1.0.0.rc14-4.fc7
+findutils.i386 1:4.2.29-2
+gzip.i386 0:1.3.11-2.fc7
+kernel.i586 0:2.6.22-20071213.7.olpc.807beb7d0b8a49a
-kernel.i586 0:2.6.22-20071217.26.olpc.4bc6482c850101c
+kpartx.i386 0:
Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>
> you only explicity Require packages you need to run. on my system for
> instance
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ rpm -q --whatrequires findutils
> mkinitrd-6.0.19-4.fc8
> java-1.5.0-gcj-1.5.0.0-17.fc8
> man-1.6e-3.fc7
> prelink-0.4.0-1
> rpm-build-4.4.2.2-7.fc8
> rpmdevtools-6.4
On Monday 17 December 2007, Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
> On 12/17/07 20:42, Marcus Leech wrote:
> > So, things like "find" and "cpio" were only listed as dependencies of
> > mkinitrd, and not in
> > any other packages? That's really weird!
>
> I guess these packages were so pervasively present
>
On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 19:46 -0500, Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
> On 12/17/07 19:11, Marcus Leech wrote:
> > Missing /usr/lib/modules//*.dep, etc. This is fixed by doing a
> > "depmod -a" after upgrading.
>
> This appears to be fixed in 1439, announced just
> 4mins after your post :-)
I'm still h
On 12/17/07 20:42, Marcus Leech wrote:
> So, things like "find" and "cpio" were only listed as dependencies of
> mkinitrd, and not in
> any other packages? That's really weird!
I guess these packages were so pervasively present
everywhere that nobody even bothered to specify
them explicitly.
Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
>
> I'm surprised how much stuff was installed only as a consequence
> of mkinitrd. The Fedora people should be informed of this
> problem, as it is likely to bite on every embedded distro
> based off Fedora.
>
>
So, things like "find" and "cpio" were only listed as de
On 12/12/07 10:16, Jim Gettys wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 01:15 -0500, Build Announcer Script wrote:
>> http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build1405/
>>
>> -libertas-usb8388-firmware.noarch 2:5.110.20.p42-1.olpc2
>> +libertas-usb8388-firmware.noarch 2:5.110.20.p47-1.olpc2
>> -
On 12/17/07 19:11, Marcus Leech wrote:
> Missing /usr/lib/modules//*.dep, etc. This is fixed by doing a
> "depmod -a" after upgrading.
This appears to be fixed in 1439, announced just
4mins after your post :-)
> But there's also chunks of filesystem missing:
>
> /var/lock/subsys/{a-bunch-of-th
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build1439/
-kernel.i586 0:2.6.22-20071217.23.olpc.6c06bbc026be2f4
+kernel.i586 0:2.6.22-20071217.26.olpc.4bc6482c850101c
--
This email was automatically generated
Aggregated logs at http://dev.laptop.org/~bert/joyride-pkgs.html
_
Missing /usr/lib/modules//*.dep, etc. This is fixed by doing a
"depmod -a" after upgrading.
But there's also chunks of filesystem missing:
/var/lock/subsys/{a-bunch-of-things}
/var/run/dbus
/security
/var/lib/stateless/{a-bunch-of-things}
I looked at the build.logs for 1438, 1437, and 1436, an
Friends,
We'll be resuming our weekly security meetings on Tuesdays at 4:00 PM
EDT. A conference call number will be announced on IRC for remote folks
who want to join.
This meeting will consist of two halves. The first half will be a
collection of status updates on specific bugs (currently #490
Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
> On 12/17/07 14:06, Marcus Leech wrote:
>
>> Multitudinous modprobe errors on start.
>>
>
> See the thread about 1432. If you need to test
> this build, just do a "depmod -a" manually and
> reboot.
>
> The fix is already on its way. Maybe someone
> could revert
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build1438/
-olpc-library-common.noarch 0:1-11
+olpc-library-common.noarch 0:1-12
-olpc-library-core.noarch 0:1-11
+olpc-library-core.noarch 0:1-12
-olpc-library-webserver.noarch 0:0.2-1
--- olpc-library-common.noarch 1-12 ---
* remove webser
On 17/12/07 13:22 -0500, David Woodhouse wrote:
> If we should design a next generation of DCON chip, are there any
> improvements we should make to it?
I remember that we really needed to synchronize the vsync with the GPU -
either generate the vsync externally and drive both components, or outpu
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 04:10:09 -0500
Bernardo Innocenti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
>
> Here follows updated patch for the kernel spec file, tested by
> installing and removing the package on a running system with
> no mkinitrd.
Thanks, pushed.
>
> I wonder if it may be a good idea to als
On 12/17/07 14:06, Marcus Leech wrote:
> Multitudinous modprobe errors on start.
See the thread about 1432. If you need to test
this build, just do a "depmod -a" manually and
reboot.
The fix is already on its way. Maybe someone
could revert to the previous version of the kernel
package for the
Multitudinous modprobe errors on start.
Avahi doesn't start
HAL hangs for a LONG time
various pieces of filesystem appear to not be there, including bits
required by Network Manager
various bits of dbus filesystem not there, so dbus doesn't start
___
D
Hi everyone!
Could be this support meeting be done in IRC in the future?
cheers!
On Dec 17, 2007 1:34 PM, Kim Quirk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes! I will write up minutes and publish on email and probably wiki.
>
> Kim
>
>
>
> On Dec 17, 2007 1:04 PM, ffm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Wil
Yes! I will write up minutes and publish on email and probably wiki.
Kim
On Dec 17, 2007 1:04 PM, ffm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Will someone be keeping minutes for those of us who cannot be available at
> that time?
>
> -ffm
>
___
Devel mailing lis
If we should design a next generation of DCON chip, are there any
improvements we should make to it?
Adam, do I recall correctly that you had problems hooking it up to X for
idle detection? Anything we could do to make that better?
--
dwmw2
___
Devel
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build1437/
+olpc-utils.i386 0:0.53-1.olpc2
-olpc-utils.i386 0:0.58-1.olpc2
--
This email was automatically generated
Aggregated logs at http://dev.laptop.org/~bert/joyride-pkgs.html
___
Devel maili
Will someone be keeping minutes for those of us who cannot be available at
that time?
-ffm
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Now that we have G1G1 recipients we would like to discuss ways to help
people get started and how to help answer all the questions that have begun
to hit via [EMAIL PROTECTED], multiple IRC channels, forums,
community-support, etc.
Here are some ideas for agenda:
* Groupings of people: by media a
Guillaume Desmottes wrote:
> Le dimanche 16 décembre 2007 à 23:03 -0500, Marcus Leech a écrit :
>
>> I was running Joyride 1407, but upgraded to 1430. WPA appears to no
>> longer function. I know that WPA broke around 1416, but
>> I guess I assumed that it would have been fixed. But perhaps
John Watlington wrote:
> I know what a write-back buffer is...
>
> But I would never characterize a filesystem's write
> throughput as the peak bandwidth when writing
> into the buffer. (That's a marketing trick.)
We neither.
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)
_
I know what a write-back buffer is...
But I would never characterize a filesystem's write
throughput as the peak bandwidth when writing
into the buffer. (That's a marketing trick.)
Extended writes either fill up memory or degrade to
a number which is more reasonable to compare to
the write band
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build1436/
-kernel.i586 0:2.6.22-20071215.21.olpc.6fce16b65e15831
+kernel.i586 0:2.6.22-20071217.23.olpc.6c06bbc026be2f4
-sugar-datastore.noarch 0:0.7.0-1
+sugar-datastore.noarch 0:0.7.1-1
--
This email was automatically generated
Aggregated
On Monday 17 December 2007, Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
> C. Scott Ananian wrote:
> > On Dec 16, 2007 7:14 PM, Bernardo Innocenti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> The new-kernel-pkg script is part of mkinitrd :-(
> >>
> >> Please, allow me some time to come up with a straightforward
> >> fix that does
Joel Stanley wrote:
> On Dec 17, 2007 5:55 PM, Ivan Krstić
> wrote:
> > On Dec 17, 2007, at 1:51 AM, Joel Stanley wrote:
> > > JFFS2 has done an excellent job, at least on my xos, of keeping
> > > filesystem integrity after sudden power-offs.
> >
> > Write-back caching does not adversely affect f
C. Scott Ananian wrote:
> On Dec 16, 2007 7:14 PM, Bernardo Innocenti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The new-kernel-pkg script is part of mkinitrd :-(
>>
>> Please, allow me some time to come up with a straightforward
>> fix that doesn't require putting mkinitrd back in the builds.
>
> Can you plea
ext Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
> Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
>
>> but unfortunately have not got feedback, and I suspect one of the reasons is
>> that it is too difficult to boot UBIFS on XO.
>
> It would be great to have a demo OS image using UBIFS. I can't
> help for the partitioning thing, but if
Le dimanche 16 décembre 2007 à 23:03 -0500, Marcus Leech a écrit :
> I was running Joyride 1407, but upgraded to 1430. WPA appears to no
> longer function. I know that WPA broke around 1416, but
> I guess I assumed that it would have been fixed. But perhaps not?
That's a known bug. See http:
Joel Stanley wrote:
> It makes a hello of a lot of sense in the scenario you describe.
>
> However, how will this positive effect be negated by data loss due to
> loss of power? There will be times where power is unexpectedly
> removed, and I would expect this scenario to be common with our user
>
37 matches
Mail list logo
