Hello,
On 5/23/08, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/22/08, Waqas Toor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have changed fullscreen mode of Xephyr into 800x600, but now how to
change the size of frames and icons ?
I have tried changing sugar-xo.gtkrc file but nothing happens, any
John Watlington writes:
The loss of a keyboard is mourned. But so much of the activities
the young kids that OLPC is targetting do are more manual and direct.
Kids too young for a keyboard? That would be below school age.
The desire to maximize display area (but clam-shell, not tablet, for
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build1975
Changes in build 1975 from build: 1973
Size delta: 0.00M
-olpccontents 2.1-0
+olpccontents 2.2-0
--
This mail was automatically generated
See http://dev.laptop.org/~rwh/announcer/joyride-pkgs.html for aggregate logs
See
Waqas Toor wrote:
1024x786 becomes full screen mode in my ubuntu, what I want to do to
make it a smaller screen size and the aspect ratio of the frame/canvas
should adjust accordingly, Full screen mode does wierd things :)
If you use sugar-emulator, this is a problem (I wouldn't call it a bug
Albert Cahalan wrote:
I can think of a few ways to integrate a keyboard with this new design.
But then we continue the huge production/logistical problem of
generating keyboards (and spares keyboards) for each country.
For generating them, you could do something more like an ink-jet.
Then
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/faster/build1975
Changes in build 1975 from build: 1972
Size delta: 0.00M
-olpccontents 2.1-0
+olpccontents 2.2-0
--
This mail was automatically generated
See http://dev.laptop.org/~rwh/announcer/faster-pkgs.html for aggregate logs
See
C. Scott Ananian wrote:
On 5/22/08, Michael Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marco and I (as well as Dennis and Bernie) had some long chats at the
beginning of this week about how to work together to pull of the next
release. At Marco's request, I've posted one important chunk of this
John Gilmore wrote:
It'll be hard for OLPC to get multi-touch working when for the last 15
months they haven't had the bandwidth to figure out whether the
current touchpad can do tap to click (ticket #959). But developers
and users of devices built between now and then will write most of the
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 6:27 AM, Martin Langhoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Martin Langhoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll diagnose a bit more and post back.
I'm baffled. I initially suspected PEBKAC but it keeps happening. With
the patch the DS gets renamed,
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 10:19 AM, Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 6:27 AM, Martin Langhoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Martin Langhoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll diagnose a bit more and post back.
I'm baffled. I initially
sugar.gtkrc and sugar/graphics/style.py
Marco
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 12:03 AM, Waqas Toor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello All,
I have changed fullscreen mode of Xephyr into 800x600, but now how to
change the size of frames and icons ?
I have tried changing sugar-xo.gtkrc file but nothing
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 6:45 AM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A broken build is not a bad thing, as long as there is still a stable
version for people to use. Linus' philosophy of development is valid
here: the way to get bugs fixed is to get the code distributed.
In my
Note that afaik Sugar is not starting up at the moment in olpc-3. We
should give dgilmore some help...
Marco
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 6:45 AM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A broken build is not a bad thing, as
Sure, that's the point.
I heard that issue was already solved and that olpc3-16 would be
coming out soon.
Is there anything I can do?
Thanks,
Tomeu
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 11:40 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Note that afaik Sugar is not starting up at the moment in
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 10:07 AM, Alex Belits
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Gilmore wrote:
It'll be hard for OLPC to get multi-touch working when for the last 15
months they haven't had the bandwidth to figure out whether the
current touchpad can do tap to click (ticket #959). But developers
Zarro Boogs per Child wrote:
#7062: TestTile does not alow 'random (5) = 3'
-+--
Reporter: karl| Owner: etoys
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: normal
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 2:17 AM, Gary C Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now don't get me wrong, there are _huge_ UI feedback details*** to get
right for a 100% touch keyboard, and it worries me that the current
(and cute) Xo HW has so far such a poor and neglected trackpad, often
close to
Hello,
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 11:16 AM, Alex Belits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Waqas Toor wrote:
1024x786 becomes full screen mode in my ubuntu, what I want to do to
make it a smaller screen size and the aspect ratio of the frame/canvas
should adjust accordingly, Full screen mode does wierd
Simon Schampijer wrote:
Mikus Grinbergs wrote:
Now have the 'Circle of Activities'. But Journal does not start
automatically. [Did not have Journal on Joyride 1970, either.]
What are the steps to start Journal manually ?
Thanks, mikus
The journal is placed in /usr/share/activities
Waqas Toor wrote:
Hello,
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 11:16 AM, Alex Belits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Waqas Toor wrote:
1024x786 becomes full screen mode in my ubuntu, what I want to do to
make it a smaller screen size and the aspect ratio of the frame/canvas
should adjust accordingly, Full
On 23.05.2008, at 06:34, Alex Belits wrote:
Right, it's to make a big announcement that addresses none of those
questions, and provides no information that is going to be relevant to
the public for at least two years (and likely longer because
development
timeframe sounds pretty
Hi Alex,
That's assuming that non-OLPC developers will have access to
hardware before it will be declared ready for deployment. Otherwise
it will be like G1G1 -- first batch to outside developers coincides
with first mass deployment, then everyone complains that deployment
Hi,
It will be slightly more difficult to write (multi-touch) software
for the XO-2 in an emulator or on a regular PC... I wonder if there
are (or will be) any third party multi-touch input devices readily
available for a similar effect. Multi stylus wacom tablets?
The keyboard I
Hello Marco,
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 1:45 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sugar.gtkrc and sugar/graphics/style.py
sugar.gtkrc wont work, sugar-xo.gtkrc has the effects
and I will check style.py also
Thanks
Marco
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 12:03 AM, Waqas Toor [EMAIL
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 3:38 PM, Chris Ball [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
It will be slightly more difficult to write (multi-touch) software
for the XO-2 in an emulator or on a regular PC... I wonder if there
are (or will be) any third party multi-touch input devices readily
Chris Ball wrote:
Hi Alex,
That's assuming that non-OLPC developers will have access to
hardware before it will be declared ready for deployment. Otherwise
it will be like G1G1 -- first batch to outside developers coincides
with first mass deployment, then everyone complains
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Developer_program =)
- Eben
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 9:59 AM, Alex Belits
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris Ball wrote:
Hi Alex,
That's assuming that non-OLPC developers will have access to
hardware before it will be declared ready for deployment. Otherwise
On 23.05.2008, at 13:07, Karl Ramberg wrote:
Zarro Boogs per Child wrote:
#7062: TestTile does not alow 'random (5) = 3'
-
+--
Reporter: karl| Owner: etoys
Type: defect |
For what its worth (and I know this probably isn't easy, or we'd
already have support for it), what we really need for useful
testing/developing is a way to scale the output to the window as a
post-draw operation. That is, render everything as though it were a
1200x900 screen, and scale to the
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 10:25 AM, Kim Quirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are trying to finalize the Turkish keyboard and I would like to get
any last minute opinions or thoughts. A number of people have already
provided their input -- THANKS!
Please see the updated Q keyboard layout for
Bert Freudenberg wrote:
On 23.05.2008, at 06:34, Alex Belits wrote:
Right, it's to make a big announcement that addresses none of those
questions, and provides no information that is going to be relevant to
the public for at least two years (and likely longer because
development
Hi,
On Tuesday 20 May 2008 15:50, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
I claim you didn't understand.
And you were right.
:)
regards,
Holger
pgp5EvMNeXBFb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
Hello,
yes, I agree now after a little hack, sugar seems fine but now another issue :)
when I use any activity inside it, it remain full screen e.g. 1200x900
whereas the resolution of my Xephyr terminal is 800x600
can any body point me to where these ratios( screen resolutions ) are
defined in
Hi,
On Wednesday 21 May 2008 16:06, Chris Ball wrote:
Yes. We have the openssh-blacklist package installed, which contains
keyhashes of all possible weak keys and disallows logins using them.
AFAIK not all possible weak keys, but only for the most popular arches and
(definitly only) the
Waqas -- After you fight your way through all these issues, could you make a
wiki page that lists all the things you had to do to get this to work? I
think lots of people would be very grateful.
Carol Lerche
___
Devel mailing list
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build1976
Changes in build 1976 from build: 1975
Size delta: 0.00M
-kernel 2.6.22-20080408.1.olpc.de2a86ff3b60edc
+kernel 2.6.22-20080523.1.olpc.28f4cb6e780db07
-xorg-x11-drv-evdev 1.2.0-2norel.olpc2
+xorg-x11-drv-evdev 1.2.0-3norel.olpc2
Hello Carol,
Yes I would love to add that, any body working on developer's
documentation of sugar which contains sugar's core design and code,
the sugar components page in wiki is very abstract :(
--wt
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 8:38 PM, Carol Lerche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Waqas -- After you
Thank you. This is exactly what I was getting at. Sometimes impression
doesn't match reality but it really has to be managed. May open source
projects flourished based on good PR and some excellent, superior
technologies dwindle away when the feelings of the outside world are
ignored. I'm not
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/faster/build1976
Changes in build 1976 from build: 1975
Size delta: 0.14M
-kernel 2.6.22-20080408.1.olpc.de2a86ff3b60edc
+kernel 2.6.22-20080523.1.olpc.28f4cb6e780db07
-xorg-x11-drv-evdev 1.2.0-2norel.olpc2
+xorg-x11-drv-evdev 1.2.0-3norel.olpc2
On 23.05.2008, at 04:54, Jim Gettys wrote:
On Thu, 2008-05-22 at 19:28 -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
If they put me in charge, I'd choose whichever CPU had the best
performance, lowest power consumption, and lowest price - regardless
of architecture.
Change the ordering: power consumption
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 2:03 AM, Alex Belits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Denver Gingerich wrote:
For the record, this is the olpc.fth file that I'm using to boot from OFW:
\ Boot script
ro root=/dev/mmcblk0p1 rootdelay=1 console=ttyS0,115200 console=tty0
fbcon=font:SUN12x22 to boot-file
boot
The Etoys activity does that already. I'm not familiar with the Xephyr
code base but hopefully it would not be too hard to add scaling.
Another option is running Sugar in x11vnc instead of Xephyr and using
a scaling VNC viewer.
- Bert -
On 23.05.2008, at 17:07, Eben Eliason wrote:
For
On 5/23/08, Eben Eliason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 9:59 AM, Alex Belits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How many developers were in that program, and how can one join it? Is it
available now, between G1G1's?
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Developer_program =)
There were at
On Fri, 23 May 2008 12:44:39 -0400
Denver Gingerich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 2:03 AM, Alex Belits [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Denver Gingerich wrote:
For the record, this is the olpc.fth file that I'm using to boot
from OFW: \ Boot script
ro root=/dev/mmcblk0p1
Hi,
On 23.05.2008 17:16, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Wednesday 21 May 2008 16:06, Chris Ball wrote:
Yes. We have the openssh-blacklist package installed, which contains
keyhashes of all possible weak keys and disallows logins using them.
AFAIK not all possible weak keys, but only for
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Andres Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 23 May 2008 12:44:39 -0400
Denver Gingerich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any other suggestions? Has anyone successfully booted 2.6.26-rc2 from
the laptop.org git on a C2 XO-1?
Did you manually build that?
On 23.05.2008 17:15, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Tuesday 20 May 2008 15:50, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
I claim [...]
And you were right.
Thanks for checking my math.
Regards,
Carl-Daniel
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
On Fri, 23 May 2008 13:23:46 -0400
Denver Gingerich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Andres Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, 23 May 2008 12:44:39 -0400
Denver Gingerich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any other suggestions? Has anyone successfully booted
On 23/05/08 18:00 +0200, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
On 23.05.2008, at 04:54, Jim Gettys wrote:
On Thu, 2008-05-22 at 19:28 -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
If they put me in charge, I'd choose whichever CPU had the best
performance, lowest power consumption, and lowest price - regardless
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 1:37 PM, Andres Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 23 May 2008 13:23:46 -0400
Denver Gingerich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Andres Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Did you manually build that? Automated kernel builds are very
Since I don't have root, the last command failed to build an RPM (it
wants to put it in /usr/share/redhat/RPMS)
RPM is happy to build things in user-specified locations. You may be
particularly interested in the suite of rpmbuild path-setting options
including:
--define _topdir=/foo
On 23.05.2008, at 19:38, Jordan Crouse wrote:
On 23/05/08 18:00 +0200, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
/me wants a graphics accelerator.
Minor nitpick - you _have_ a graphics accelerator. What you really
want
is a 3D graphics engine. Be sure to keep the distinction seperate;
lots of embedded
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 1:51 PM, Michael Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since I don't have root, the last command failed to build an RPM (it
wants to put it in /usr/share/redhat/RPMS)
RPM is happy to build things in user-specified locations. You may be
particularly interested in the suite
On 5/23/08, Simon Schampijer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm all for not landing broken code into joyride (which makes joyride
the 'testing' branch of the debian triumvirate),
? Has this something to do with #7012: olpc-update ubuntu?
No, it's just shorthand for a conversation we've had
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 02:04:25PM -0400, Denver Gingerich wrote:
Are these documented somewhere?
http://rpm.org/max-rpm-snapshot/s1-rpmrc-file-rpmrc-file-entries.html
(Also occasionally useful:
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/drafts/rpm-guide-en/ch-creating-rpms.html)
Note: I'm given
I will be out of town and largely off the net from today, May 23, 2008 to
Tuesday, June 3, 2008. Urgent issues which cannot wait for my return can be
referred to Dennis (if they can be resolved remotely) or cjb.
cheers,
Henry Edward Hardy
sysadmin, OLPC
On Fri, 23 May 2008 13:42:41 -0400
Denver Gingerich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
How do you compile the kernel? I'm not accustomed to using
distro-specific targets for compiling a kernel so I basically take
suggestions from others for the best way to compile an XO kernel. I
considered
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Andres Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 23 May 2008 13:42:41 -0400
Denver Gingerich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
How do you compile the kernel? I'm not accustomed to using
distro-specific targets for compiling a kernel so I basically take
Scott,
I agree with the need for at least the four branches that you have
described below. I would think the Support team would be most familiar
with the Stable branch; the QA/Test team would do most of their work
(especially system level testing) from the Testing branch; and the
Development
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
As I stated before on this list, bypassing P_THEFT is very easy. You
don't even have to desolder the complete flash chip, one pin is
sufficient. All of this is doable for less than $1 per laptop if you
have access to cheap labor. $1 per laptop is _not_ expensive
G1G1, Joyride 1971. Was visiting a friend. Apparently, he keeps
his house less humid than mine. Noticed that when I waved my hand
in the air some two inches above the touchpad, the cursor (e.g., in
Terminal) would move around uncontrollably, and even jump.
In fact, I had difficulty
On 23.05.2008 21:37, Richard A. Smith wrote:
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
As I stated before on this list, bypassing P_THEFT is very easy. You
don't even have to desolder the complete flash chip, one pin is
sufficient. All of this is doable for less than $1 per laptop if you
have access to
Mikus Grinbergs wrote:
G1G1, Joyride 1971. Was visiting a friend. Apparently, he keeps
his house less humid than mine. Noticed that when I waved my hand
in the air some two inches above the touchpad, the cursor (e.g., in
Terminal) would move around uncontrollably, and even jump.
[Back
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Antoine van Gelder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 19 May 2008, at 19:21, Albert Cahalan wrote:
Are you serious? Are you really a Republican? No Child's Behind Left
is the worst disaster in education in decades, as John Holt would have
been the first to point out
Richard et al,
(I am passing this to the education list... because it is a mix of tech
issues with issues related to the general policy about the XOs / and OLPC).
I agree with the level of security that you are talking about. And I
understand what are your concerns (some of them are valid for
On Fri, 23 May 2008 13:42:41 -0400
Denver Gingerich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 1:37 PM, Andres Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, 23 May 2008 13:23:46 -0400
Denver Gingerich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Andres Salomon
[EMAIL
Bert...
Part of the problem is the X driver model is pretty broken, causing much
more to be done in software than should be necessary; and it isn't clear
we're even using X efficiently at the moment... The driver stuff is
getting fixed (in general in X: this is the EXA/DRI2 work); profiling of
Implemented rate adaptation support via 'iwconfig rate' API. It is now
possible to specify a bit-rate value and append 'auto'. That will configure
rate adaptation to use all bit-rates equal or lower than than selected value.
Made lbs_cmd_802_11_rate_adapt_rateset a direct command.
This patch
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Kim Quirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scott,
I agree with the need for at least the four branches that you have
described below. I would think the Support team would be most familiar
with the Stable branch; the QA/Test team would do most of their work
(especially
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 2:18 AM, Alex Belits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then the announcement should be:
Don't take it so seriously. It's a vision set of mockups, and the
different technical aspects of how to get there will be fleshed out in
time and discussed in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
And when I say
I will note that testing in Debian wasn't a good place to live for a
very long time: it didn't get timely security updates, and consequently,
no one ran it (so it got minimal testing, despite its name).
I believe Debian has fixed this... We must avoid a similar issue.
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 5:26 PM, Andres Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 1:37 PM, Andres Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[...]
Hm, can't say I've ever tried using make binrpm-pkg.
Current master _should_ boot, but I've also been testing my own
builds rather than
On Fri, 2008-05-23 at 14:21 -0700, Javier Cardona wrote:
Implemented rate adaptation support via 'iwconfig rate' API. It is now
possible to specify a bit-rate value and append 'auto'. That will configure
rate adaptation to use all bit-rates equal or lower than than selected value.
Made
Note that we *cannot* share much of the information about the possible
alternatives we are examining for Gen-2 hardware until decisions are
final; it is the basis of serious negotiations among competing parties,
under non-disclosure agreements.
The best we can do is share the conceptual ideas,
Bert Freudenberg wrote:
But seriously, the new design needs to be anticipated by the developer
community, development from now on should take into account the future
hardware directions. So I for one hope that developers will be
informed of anticipated hardware changes as early as
Steve Holton wrote:
You missed a step. ;-)
The 'what it will be' statement is usually derived from (and guided
by) the 'what it must be' statement.
Step 1 (the 'what it must be') is the list of Requirements.
From the requirements we can dual track derive the possible
implementations
This was posted by SJ to the olpc-open and grassroots lists
(http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/grassroots/2008-May/000403.html) but
C. Scott and Chris Ball pointed out that some community members who may
be interested might only be subscribed to devel - hence the forward.
Of particular
Hello,
I attached the application text and my public key.
Keys generated with the patched openssl on my debian.
Regards,
Marcel Renaud
1. Departamentos
2. No Website
3. A small python/gtk educational game
4. Departamentos is a small educational app thought for small(1st and 2nd year)
On 5/23/08, Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Note that we *cannot* share much of the information about the possible
alternatives we are examining for Gen-2 hardware until decisions are
final; it is the basis of serious negotiations among competing parties,
under non-disclosure
Jim Gettys wrote:
Bert...
Part of the problem is the X driver model is pretty broken, causing much
more to be done in software than should be necessary; and it isn't clear
we're even using X efficiently at the moment... The driver stuff is
getting fixed (in general in X: this is the
Jim Gettys wrote:
I will note that testing in Debian wasn't a good place to live for a
very long time: it didn't get timely security updates, and consequently,
no one ran it (so it got minimal testing, despite its name).
Except for Sarge. There was a three-year interval between Potato and
Martin has a good point: we're still in the phase of basic things like
processor selection.
And one of the really major questions is what touch technology to use;
Mary Lou tells me there are many different technologies out there at the
moment; we'll have to make another big decision there at some
On 24 May 2008, at 00:13, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
I could use help editing and transcoding the video. It appears that
the DVD is cut into 10-minute chapters which don't correspond to the
actual talks, so the chapters will need to be stitched together in
kino or similar, broken at semantic
On Fri, 2008-05-23 at 17:17 -0700, Alex Belits wrote:
Jim Gettys wrote:
Bert...
Part of the problem is the X driver model is pretty broken, causing much
more to be done in software than should be necessary; and it isn't clear
we're even using X efficiently at the moment... The driver
On Fri, 2008-05-23 at 20:38 +0530, Sayamindu Dasgupta wrote:
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 10:25 AM, Kim Quirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are trying to finalize the Turkish keyboard and I would like to get
any last minute opinions or thoughts. A number of people have already
provided their input
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Watlington wrote:
| On May 22, 2008, at 11:01 AM, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
| GPS enables a lot of mapping and geography-related educational
| activities, which is why it was originally considered for the
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 8:19 PM, Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ouch, sorry, I should have been more explicit in that this patch
introduces a dependency on cjson. I'm going to send next another patch
that falls back to simplejson (slower) if cjson is not available.
Ah, it was pebkac
Note that we *cannot* share much of the information about the
possible alternatives we are examining for Gen-2 hardware
until decisions are final; it is the basis of serious negotiations
among competing parties, under non-disclosure agreements.
Lest rumors of more OLPC secrets get started,
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 8:10 PM, Alex Belits
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eben Eliason wrote:
For what it's worth, I would be careful to portray the low-achievers
and the brightest as opposites. As I note below, I frequently find
that some of the brightest are also some of the low-achievers, due
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 11:39:11PM -0400, Albert Cahalan wrote:
Do remember that No Child Left Behind is actually working.
I don't pretend to be an expert, but certainly there are people who
dispute the effectiveness of NCLB.
http://nochildleft.com/
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 3:16 PM, Albert Cahalan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You ended up with
Lots of accusations :-( Have you successfully negotiated with hw
vendors over innovative gear at very low cost in the past?
We do make mistakes, and in some cases there are tradeoffs. It's part
of doing
I have a few ideas on how we should do this. It is largely influenced by
Fedora and as we are based on fedora and we *SHOULD* be working with fedora
i think that should weigh heavily in in its favour.
Major disruptive development and change happens in a development branch. when
it gets
Typo - I should have written:
Grandstanding about the mistakes made is cheap, with the advantage that most
people aren't
familiar with the issues at hand.
Albert also wrote
Minus the dollar figures of course, getting contracts out in
public would be very good for you. Groklaw would be a
On 5/23/08, Paul Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
c. scott ananian wrote:
I've posted the agenda for this week's country meetings, and slides
from most talks, at:
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Presentations/May_2008_Country_Workshop
This includes Nicholas' talk on Tuesday where he
94 matches
Mail list logo
