On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 12:07 PM, James Cameron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 11:28:34AM +0200, Sebastien Adgnot wrote:
Do you have an idea of the minimum quantity required so the
manufacturer could build laptops with localized keyboards?
I'm sure they would.
It
I did some minor updates to Trac so we can actually remove spam. If you
see anything explode, please notify the proper authorities.
On a related note, we now have to ability to force users to validate
their email address before touching tickets. This is currently disabled,
but do you guys
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 11:09 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 10:12 PM, Michael Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So the questions are: is this a feature we should deliver for the 8.2
release?
In my opinion, no.
Do you think differently?
Personally I
Le lundi 09 juin 2008 à 16:12 -0400, Michael Stone a écrit :
Tomeu,
have heard occasional requests to implement the sending and sharing of
journal entries.
It's a desirable feature but, from my perspective, it's much lower in
immediate priority than work which brings the sugar UI
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 9:48 AM, Guillaume Desmottes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le lundi 09 juin 2008 à 16:12 -0400, Michael Stone a écrit :
Tomeu,
have heard occasional requests to implement the sending and sharing of
journal entries.
It's a desirable feature but, from my perspective, it's
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 7:59 AM, Polychronis Ypodimatopoulos
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought I covered this scenario quite thoroughly; cerebro enabled
about 70 laptops to chat in a simple mesh, even without using an access
point or a school server. I got no useful comments, nor was there any
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:02 AM, Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 7:59 AM, Polychronis Ypodimatopoulos
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought I covered this scenario quite thoroughly; cerebro enabled
about 70 laptops to chat in a simple mesh, even without using an
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 9:55 PM, Michael Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 02:50:30PM -0400, Garrett Goebel wrote:
How many Full Time Equivalent hours does a given developer represent?
A guesstimate: about 25 hrs/wk of coding and 30 hrs/wk of talking for
social folks,
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 9:09 AM, James Simmons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know there are several people interested in having Text to Speech with
Karaoke highlighting be a built in part of the Sugar environment. Also,
when I originally requested a Git repository for the Read Etexts
activity Ed
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:06:17AM +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:02 AM, Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still don't understand what's in the path to integrate cerebro into
sugar. You proposed to change the API and of course you were asked to
justify
Edward,
Ubuntu packages are already available for speech-dispatcher, espeak, and
festival, so it isn't difficult to set up a demo. You can use apt-get.
You would have to modify a configuration file to use the espeak module
(not espeak-generic) and you would have to start speech-dispatcher
Hi Edward,
Ubuntu packages are already available for speech-dispatcher, espeak, and
festival, so it isn't difficult to set up a demo. You can use apt-get. You
would have to modify a configuration file to use the espeak module (not
espeak-generic) and you would have to start
Ok, it's available at:
http://www.inf.ufrgs.br/~dmbasso/TinyGL4XO.tgz
I just packed my git repository, so you may check exactly what the
changes were. Although I don't have time to work on it right now, I'll
answer any questions you might have.
Daniel
Benjamin M. Schwartz escreveu:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Michael Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:06:17AM +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:02 AM, Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still don't understand what's in the path to integrate cerebro into
sugar.
Note the return to original time: 2:00 PM EST, 6:00 PM UTC.
Let's chat about G1G1 and our goals for August. Please reply with any
other topics that are on your mind.
Michael
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 6:55 PM, Michael Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Note the return to original time: 2:00 PM EST, 6:00 PM UTC.
Let's chat about G1G1 and our goals for August. Please reply with any
other topics that are on your mind.
OLPC-3 status.
Marco
Tomeu and Marco,
For the history, both me and another student from MIT tried to implement
a connection manager back in January but gave up after a couple of
weeks, even with significant help from Daf. We don't claim to be expert
python programmers, but spending two weeks on something and still
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Polychronis Ypodimatopoulos wrote:
| 2) Make provision in both sugar and activities so that there is a clear
| abstraction from telepathy so that _if_ a better collaboration stack
| comes along, telepathy won't be hardcoded in sugar. This mainly
|
Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote:
Polychronis Ypodimatopoulos wrote:
| 2) Make provision in both sugar and activities so that there is a clear
| abstraction from telepathy so that _if_ a better collaboration stack
| comes along, telepathy won't be hardcoded in sugar. This mainly
| involves
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Polychronis Ypodimatopoulos wrote:
| Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote:
| Polychronis Ypodimatopoulos wrote:
| | 2) Make provision in both sugar and activities so that there is a clear
| | abstraction from telepathy so that _if_ a better collaboration stack
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear Networking experts,
I have been fighting for several months with the fact that invitations
often seem not to work, when running on a serverless mesh. The symptoms
are quite strange. If an invitation works once between two laptops, it
continues
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 03:03:06PM -0400, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote:
...
With some help from Daf, we managed to get a tcpdump trace from two XOs
exhibiting this behavior at 1CC. The dumps are attached to ticket #6463.
~ What we saw is bizarre, but also consistent with the behavior in the
nice report.
Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear Networking experts,
I have been fighting for several months with the fact that invitations
often seem not to work, when running on a serverless mesh. The symptoms
are quite strange. If an
Hi,
If an invitation works once between two laptops, it continues to
work between them reliably. If it fails once, it continues to fail
between them consistently.
I think I've seen an analog of this problem but with activity joining
rather than invitations.
Like Michael pointed out, there are few people at OLPC who understand
and enjoy telepathy. I think this is an understatement. Personally, I
think that Collabora was very pressed to get something working on the
laptop and the resulting presence stack looks like one hack on top of
another. For
I just pushed upstream the last of the outstanding patches from the OLPC
Geode X driver. We should now be completely synced. From
this point on, the OLPC images should consider using the upstream driver
rather then the custom driver.
If no issues pop up by the end of the week, then GIT head
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Polychronis Ypodimatopoulos wrote:
| Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote:
| Polychronis Ypodimatopoulos wrote:
| | 2) Make provision in both sugar and activities so that there
Ben,
~ The invitations are unicast, implemented using TCP. When machine A sends
an invitation to B, we see the following exchange:
1. A broadcasts an ARP request for B
2. B sees the ARP request and replies to A
3. A receives the ARP reply from B and sends a TCP SYN to B
4. B does not see
Fixed mail server problem. This should go through. Apologies for dups.
Original Message
Subject:Re: Peru Upgrade process
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 17:54:14 -0400
From: Chris Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 7:05 PM, Polychronis Ypodimatopoulos
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Like Michael pointed out, there are few people at OLPC who understand and
enjoy telepathy. I think this is an understatement. Personally, I think
that Collabora was very pressed to get something working on the
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 7:51 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 7:05 PM, Polychronis Ypodimatopoulos
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* The abstraction layer needs to be accessible to non-python
activities. Unless you want to expose it through DBus, you will have
Bill,
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 2:25 PM, Bill Mccormick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey guys,
I've tracked down some of the code that's causing this problem. (the
syslog file is invaluable for debugging nm problems in case you have to
do this again). NM is waiting for a netlink callback,
Ricardo Carrano wrote:
We need Jabber to be working too. For the infra scenario in the schools to
work.
But if we consider Cerebro an important part of our future (at least I
do) we should dedicate more attention to it. I don't know about the
arrangements between OLPC and Collabora. It seems
Somewhat off-topic, but I want to get this idea out there. Disclaimer: I am
suggesting a mechanism for extra security that would build beyond bitfrost,
when we have yet to implement the relevant part of bitfrost in the first
place. If you think it is a waste of time to look beyond the next step,
We are discussing this and the best use of resources to get to 8.2.0 and
beyond. There will be many more discussions. I would like to figure out how
to make progress on cerebro.
Kim
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 9:34 PM, Robert McQueen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ricardo Carrano wrote:
We need
Ricardo Carrano wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Polychronis Ypodimatopoulos wrote:
| I thought we were talking about collaboration. MSN, IRC etc are
| basically chat protocols. Cerebro has little to do with such protocols;
| its goal is
C. Scott Ananian wrote:
I've got a concrete non-technical objection: kids at gamejams
invariably want to write a multiplayer game. Almost none succeed.
This tells me we need a better collaboration API.
You can argue that this simple API should be *on top* of the
lower-level telepathy (or
A while ago, Walter mentioned that we'd like to be able to customize things
like keyboard and internationalization settings. These settings are loaded by a
program called 'olpc-session' maintained in the olpc-utils package.
Unfortunately, when I set out to implement support for this feature, I
---
olpc-session |9 +++--
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/olpc-session b/olpc-session
index 2e3a4b7..280f4be 100755
--- a/olpc-session
+++ b/olpc-session
@@ -23,14 +23,19 @@ LANG=en_US.UTF-8
XKB_LAYOUT=us
# We need to stop loading of certain GTK Input
Sebastien Adgnot [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Because without an AZERTY keyboard, it will be hard to defend the
project here.
Not only here in France, but in many french-speaking countries.
Most of them use an AZERTY keyboard.
--
Bastien
___
Devel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Trent Lloyd wrote:
| 1. A broadcasts an ARP request for B
| 2. B sees the ARP request and replies to A
| 3. A receives the ARP reply from B and sends a TCP SYN to B
| Thus I suspect the issue is the nodes simply have no direct
| communication at all
Hi Greg,
2 - I don't like the risk in the group edit and teacher review
Teacher review should not be a problem to do in a few days, but group
edit involves implementing things that I don't think Moodle blog/ ou
blog currently support, so it will take longer. The only way around that
is if we
If the machine can be set to run the kvm-based virtualisation, you can
run both F7 and Debian in separate VMs, providing both environments to
Tarun.
Martin,
Thanks for the suggestions. I was not able to get dual-boot working
properly. Somehow installing Fedora 7 next to Debian 4 clobbers each
Hi All,
Thanks for the comments and great progress!
I'll try to respond to all open items in one pass.
- On group edit. Thanks to Alex for the link and sanity check on
collaboration support in Browse. I think we should let it go for this
first implementation. When Browse does collaborate at
44 matches
Mail list logo
