On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 8:35 PM, Greg Smith wrote:
> Dan,
>
> Here's a good use case for the "image customization" feature. To install
> Cmap, I open the X activity, downloaded a zip, then unpacked it which
> created a bin file. I made that executable and ran it which launched an
> installer which
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/xo-1/streams/staging/build7
Changes in build 7 from build: 0
Size delta: 245.36M
+olpc-library-common 1-30
+openssh-server 5.1p1-2.fc9
+pyabiword 0.6.1-4.olpc3
+python-alsaaudio 0.3-1.fc9
+pygtksourceview 2.2.0-1.fc9
+pygame 1.8.0-1.olpc3.3
+olpc-netutils 0.7-1.f
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build2607
Changes in build 2607 from build: 2605
Size delta: 0.00M
-olpcrd 0.48-0
+olpcrd 0.49-0
--
This mail was automatically generated
See http://dev.laptop.org/~rwh/announcer/joyride-pkgs.html for aggregate logs
See http://dev.laptop
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build2607
Changes in build 2607 from build: 2605
Size delta: 0.00M
-olpcrd 0.48-0
+olpcrd 0.49-0
--
This mail was automatically generated
See http://dev.laptop.org/~rwh/announcer/joyride-pkgs.html for aggregate logs
See http://dev.laptop
d...@laptop.org wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 8:08 PM, wrote:
>
>> ssh host keys are probably generated on first boot as well.
>>
>> with partitioning support, it should be possible to have a r.o. root
>> overlaid by a unionfs writeable mount, so machine-specific changes
>> don't modify the
On 24.12.2008, at 00:16, da...@lang.hm wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Dec 2008, Greg Smith wrote:
>
>> Hi Bert,
>>
>> That strategy sounds good to me if its easy. You still need a custom
>> "image" because the end result should be something which can be
>> quickly
>> installed on 10K or more XOs via:
>> -
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008, Greg Smith wrote:
> Hi Bert,
>
> That strategy sounds good to me if its easy. You still need a custom
> "image" because the end result should be something which can be quickly
> installed on 10K or more XOs via:
> - USB
> - olpc-update over WAN or from XS
> - NAND Blaster
>
>
Michael Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 03:29:08PM -0500, p...@laptop.org wrote:
>
>> daniel wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 8:08 PM, wrote:
>>>
ssh host keys are probably generated on first boot as well.
with partitioning support, it should be possible
On 23.12.2008, at 22:17, Greg Smith wrote:
> Hi Bert,
>
> That strategy sounds good to me if its easy. You still need a custom
> "image" because the end result should be something which can be
> quickly installed on 10K or more XOs via:
> - USB
> - olpc-update over WAN or from XS
> - NAND Bla
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 03:29:08PM -0500, p...@laptop.org wrote:
>daniel wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 8:08 PM, wrote:
> > > ssh host keys are probably generated on first boot as well.
> > >
> > > with partitioning support, it should be possible to have a r.o. root
> > > overlaid by a unionf
Hi Bert,
That strategy sounds good to me if its easy. You still need a custom
"image" because the end result should be something which can be quickly
installed on 10K or more XOs via:
- USB
- olpc-update over WAN or from XS
- NAND Blaster
That said, making it an activity would make it easy to u
The better approach would be to install everything into the bundle
directory itself. Then simply zip it and you should have a working xo
bundle. A custom build should not be necessary for this.
- Bert -
On 23.12.2008, at 21:35, Greg Smith wrote:
> Hi Bert,
>
> Thanks. It was actually right c
Hi Bert,
Thanks. It was actually right click for me but that did it.
I installed the Cmap tools from within the X activity and it mostly worked.
A few oddities in the X activity like the arrow keys not working but
nothing fatal.
I'll follow up with the Cmap people and see if they can move it a
daniel wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 8:08 PM, wrote:
> > ssh host keys are probably generated on first boot as well.
> >
> > with partitioning support, it should be possible to have a r.o. root
> > overlaid by a unionfs writeable mount, so machine-specific changes
> > don't modify the re
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 8:08 PM, wrote:
> ssh host keys are probably generated on first boot as well.
>
> with partitioning support, it should be possible to have a r.o. root
> overlaid by a unionfs writeable mount, so machine-specific changes
> don't modify the released partition. this would ma
morgan wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 18:29, Daniel Drake wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Greg Smith
> > wrote:
...
> >> The biggest challenge I see is to find those things which you do not want
> >> to
> >> "clone" from the source XO. The only things that come to mind are
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 11:46:09AM -0800, Edward Cherlin wrote:
>On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Michael Stone wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 09:18:51PM +0200, Morgan Collett wrote:
>>>On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 18:29, Daniel Drake wrote:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Greg Smith
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Greg Smith wrote:
> Both have challenges. My preference is clone because I think its easier for
> the end user (create an XO the way you like it then click "clone"). However,
> we need to figure out the list of things that should not be cloned as you
> mention.
It
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Ed McNierney wrote:
> Thanks for the help! I think we seem to be in a state where the "first
> option" (making one RC build with all fixes) is reasonable. It also seems
> like getting a staging build for early testing today would also be helpful,
> as there are
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 09:18:51PM +0200, Morgan Collett wrote:
>>On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 18:29, Daniel Drake wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Greg Smith wrote:
Your suggestion that we allow
addition of RPMs and get th
You know you need a reason to escape the family reunion. Why sit
through kids screaming, grandpas dozing off and grannies complaining
when you can be savouring the grand School Server build? Wrap a gift,
test a server!
size 549M
sha1sum eab0fd3596bbfca532eec51eb5e774cb00b25cd8
http://xs-dev.
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 09:18:51PM +0200, Morgan Collett wrote:
>On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 18:29, Daniel Drake wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Greg Smith wrote:
>>> Your suggestion that we allow
>>> addition of RPMs and get those built into a signed image via "pilgrim or
>>> puritan" is
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 18:29, Daniel Drake wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Greg Smith wrote:
>> Your suggestion that we allow
>> addition of RPMs and get those built into a signed image via "pilgrim or
>> puritan" is certainly valuable and part of the requirement.
>>
>> However, it doe
Click to bring up a menu and open a terminal.
Alternatively, edit the ".xinitrc" file to auto-launch any X
applications you want started ("xterm &" is a common choice) before
executing the window manager. This is also how you would bundle and
launch a regular X app like cmap.
- Bert -
On 2
Hi Dan,
Those sound like two good steps.
I think we should make a design decision here to either:
1 - "clone" minus a list of configurations
or
2 - Extend customization to include everything relevant for a deployment.
Both have challenges. My preference is clone because I think its easier
for t
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Greg Smith wrote:
> Your suggestion that we allow
> addition of RPMs and get those built into a signed image via "pilgrim or
> puritan" is certainly valuable and part of the requirement.
>
> However, it doesn't cover a few added things (language settings was
> spec
Hi Greg,
It has not passed through formal QA (yet), but there is a test case on
http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/9112
I tried it out on 767, and it seems to work fine. I did not test on 656.
The bundle can be downloaded from
http://dev.laptop.org/raw-attachment/ticket/9112/Browse-101.xo
Thanks,
Sayamin
Scott -
Thanks for the help! I think we seem to be in a state where the "first
option" (making one RC build with all fixes) is reasonable. It also seems
like getting a staging build for early testing today would also be helpful,
as there are enough substantial "test in build" tickets available a
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 12:48 PM, Martin Langhoff
wrote:
> Ok, the merge was tricky, but it's done, and it seems to work too.
Pushed out the merge to a git repo too
http://dev.laptop.org/git?p=users/martin/ejabberd-xs.git;a=commitdiff;h=7b0ea0adba805e342e23b21b003e3bae6591af72
You can git clone
Hi Michael and Bert,
It got quiet enough that I had a chance to try this myself.
I tried installing and running the X activity and I tried following the
instructions here:
http://www.hackszine.com/blog/archive/2007/12/run_a_nested_x11_desktop_on_th.html
In both cases I got a gray screen wit
head towards your friendly commandline, and say...
yum --enablerepo=olpcxs-testing install ejabberd-xs
and it should bring in ejabberd-xs-2.0.1-12.fc9.olpc.i386.rpm which
has the fixes. This nees a bit of testing outside of my lab, if I hear
from you that it's working, then we have a xs-0.5.1 .
Hi Sayamindu,
Do you think the new browse version (101?) has been shown to solve the
problem Emliano raised here?
http://www.mail-archive.com/devel@lists.laptop.org/msg14839.html
Has it been tested with build 656 or only 767 (8.2)?
If we have verified that it solves the issue raised, let's ask
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 7:11 AM, Guillaume Desmottes
> This patch was started by Rob and then finished/polished by P1. The
> rational was to create new kind of shared roster groups that would be a
> subset of @all@ to, hopefully, improve the scalability issues.
Ok, the merge was tricky, but it's d
Jordan and Neil,
That's great work, thanks!
Eben, Neil and Sugar people,
Can you tell from the test descriptions below which of these operations
we are most likely to encounter in the XO GUI?
I think we can use the Cairo trace utility S found:
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Performance_tuning#Othe
Hi Jordan et al,
Thanks a lot for the advice. I'm forking this thread and will reply on
the other one too.
One question here on your suggested methodology. Are you suggesting that
we try those X composite hooks and then re-run the benchmark to see if
it improves?
All,
Is anyone interested in
Hi Dan,
Thanks for the comments on the image customization feature:
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Feature_roadmap/Image_customization
I moved them from the requirements to the specification section because
I think you are proposing a possible solution. Your suggestion that we
allow addition of RPMs
Hi all!
Just a bit of inspiration for everyone hard at work in here:
Inventor's 2020 vision: to help 1bn of the world's poorest see better
Professor pioneers DIY adjustable glasses that do not need an optician
http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2008/dec/22/diy-adjustable-glasses-josh-silver
Same
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 03:41, Mikus Grinbergs wrote:
>> +sugar-base 0.83.2-2.olpc4
>
> Good to see this up-leveled -- the previous version of this package
> as distributed in Joyride was more than a month old.
>
> However, that still leaves several packages which appear to be more
> recent in 'ol
38 matches
Mail list logo
