On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 6:28 PM, Gary C Martin g...@garycmartin.com wrote:
Clean installed on 2 XOs here (Peru/Spanish 1xB4, and US/English
1xXO-1). All went fine, no new issues to report. Working fine with WEP
AP connections (full activity update via control panel), but haven't
re-tested on
Emiliano Pastorino wrote:
Richard,
I've just received a box with 60 faulty batteries inside, so I'll be
playing with them
for the next few years...
:)
I did a bat-recover on one of them for about 18 hours and I noticed this:
When I run watch-battery, it still says No battery. I did a
I have a bad feeling about swiping the CRT I2C. It kind of leaves
a needless landmine for video driver authors who would prefer to
unify their code (XO and non-XO hardware) as much as possible.
Suppose a video driver attempts E-DDC. Is it going to confuse
some non-compliant I2C device or actually
In 15min from now!
Join us reviewing the latest OLPC/Sugar community projects today 2PM
EDT, Boston Time:
http://forum.laptop.org/chat
Then type at bottom:
/join #olpc-meeting
AGENDA:
* New Libraries!
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Projects#XO_Laptop_Lending_Libraries
* Which projects might
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 8:51 PM, John Watlington w...@laptop.org wrote:
All of our LEDs are dual (one on the inside and one on the outside).
Instead of running these in parallel, and throwing away the extra
voltage, I run them in series directly from the battery voltage
(ever notice that
John Watlington wrote:
the LED trick has the advantage of not requiring a change to the case,
just a single additional drive pin to be able to run it as a detector.
And where would you place said detector LED, without modifying the
case ?
While we're bikeshedding this to death, I'll put
On Fri, 1 May 2009, Jameson Quinn wrote:
I like the idea, but wouldn't light transmission inside the case, from the
other LED's, screw this up?
possibly, how much leakage is there between the LEDs?
David Lang
(btw, wikipedia says more light = faster backwards discharge)
Heck, the two
On Fri, 1 May 2009, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote:
John Watlington wrote:
the LED trick has the advantage of not requiring a change to the case,
just a single additional drive pin to be able to run it as a detector.
And where would you place said detector LED, without modifying the
case ?
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 8:38 PM, John Watlington w...@laptop.org wrote:
I don't have time to take a look at this right now,
but we have a A/D input to dedicate to this, if it helps work around
the patent.
We can talk to MERL if needed. I probably still know a handfull
of people around
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Aaron Hull guinartis...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry also not able to keep up recently. Had a baby boy (7 lbs. 14 oz.)
last week and have been wanting to get re-connected. But have been following
the emails while catching up at work. Keep up the good work!
Aaron
Sorry also not able to keep up recently. Had a baby boy (7 lbs. 14
oz.) last week and have been wanting to get re-connected. But have
been following the emails while catching up at work. Keep up the good
work!
Aaron
On May 1, 2009, at 11:46 AM, Holt h...@laptop.org wrote:
In 15min
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 2:28 PM, C. Scott Ananian csc...@laptop.org wrote:
Oh, yeah, you should be able to wire the top side of the LED directly to
the LED and measure the photovoltaic current directly; that's not patented:
battery voltage
Q1 |
---from
On May 1, 2009, at 2:28 PM, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 8:38 PM, John Watlington w...@laptop.org
wrote:
I don't have time to take a look at this right now,
but we have a A/D input to dedicate to this, if it helps work around
the patent.
We can talk to MERL if
The back-bias voltage is a sensitive topic.
If you could guarantee periodic clearing of the integrator,
I could provide up to 10V or so. Otherwise, it should
probably be limited to +3.3V.
wad
On May 1, 2009, at 11:59 PM, John Watlington wrote:
On May 1, 2009, at 2:28 PM, C. Scott Ananian
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 9:01 PM, Dave Bauer d...@solutiongrove.com
wrote:
Thanks for the tips. I am testing with my XO. What version of browse.xo
do I
need that supports the magic cookies? Do I need to upgrade
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Dave Bauer d...@solutiongrove.com wrote:
OK. If anyone else is interested, here is Browse-101 for 0.82
including the fix for http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/8857
http://dev.laptop.org/~dsd/py-activities/Browse-102.xo;
That's Daniel's release. Look for a release
16 matches
Mail list logo
