Re: New F11 for the XO-1 build 5

2009-08-12 Thread James Cameron
Boot tested, nothing unusual seen. rtcwake testing has shown that it needs --utc after the first shutdown. Prior to then the /etc/adjtime file is zero. -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lis

Re: New F11 for the XO-1 build 5

2009-08-12 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
--- On Mon, 8/10/09, Steven M. Parrish wrote: > From: Steven M. Parrish > Subject: New F11 for the XO-1 build 5 > To: "Fedora OLPC List" , "OLPC Development" > , "OLPC Testing" > Date: Monday, August 10, 2009, 7:35 PM > http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_XO-1 > http://dev.laptop.org/~smparri

yum with recent soas builds on XO-1

2009-08-12 Thread Mikus Grinbergs
Disclaimer: I am not asking for help; I am sharing my experiences. Apparently irrespective of the content of /etc/fstab, recent F11-on-XO1 builds are _mounting_ /var/cache/yum as a tmpfs. What gets placed into /var/cache/yum is the "indexes" of the repositories, plus actual packages as they

Re: Faster Multicast [was Re: WatchMe-1, a VNC activity]

2009-08-12 Thread david
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009, Martin Langhoff wrote: On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote: I don't know how to test this, but I think there's a chance it could be a big win.  Of course, in situations where the mDNS presence information itself is overloading the network, there's n

Re: Faster Multicast [was Re: WatchMe-1, a VNC activity]

2009-08-12 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote: > I don't know how to test this, but I think there's a chance it could be a > big win.  Of course, in situations where the mDNS presence information > itself is overloading the network, there's not much we can do. Get your hands on airt

Faster Multicast [was Re: WatchMe-1, a VNC activity]

2009-08-12 Thread Benjamin M. Schwartz
Martin Langhoff wrote: > - can we use multicast frames... and get the APs speeds bumped up to > do a "fast multicast" so as to not use up all the airtime? This would be great... and I just realized that it might also be tremendously beneficial for Telepathy-Salut. Salut uses multicast for two th

Re: [Sugar-devel] Candidate "paper cut" bugs for a new 8.2.x release?

2009-08-12 Thread Martin Langhoff
Generally agree that it is important... however. On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Richard A. Smith wrote: > You have to QA the whole system regardless of what change you make so really > it doesn't increase the QA that much anyway. No, and that is an explicit goal: keep the changes small and low

Re: [Server-devel] [Sugar-devel] Results of today's Jabber Testing

2009-08-12 Thread Dave Bauer
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 9:00 AM, Dave Bauer wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 9:39 PM, Martin Langhoff < > martin.langh...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 8:33 PM, Caroline >> Meeks wrote: >> > I worked with the RIT contingent and Dave Farning today to do some >> > collaboration

Re: [Sugar-devel] Candidate "paper cut" bugs for a new 8.2.x release?

2009-08-12 Thread Richard A. Smith
Martin Langhoff wrote: > > I understand the reasoning, but qualifying the build with a changed > kernel will kill us in QA across the system. Got to ruminate on that > one a bit... When deployments report back to us "touchpad" problems are among the top 3 items. Usually #2 behind power. Due t