On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Martin Denglermar...@martindengler.com wrote:
Like I said, I'd stop that behaviour when/if I get to it unless
someone beats me to it or explains why we want this.
Not sure about *that* mountpoint in particular, but a forest of
invisible tmpfs mounts is present
--- On Thu, 8/13/09, Paul Fox p...@laptop.org wrote:
From: Paul Fox p...@laptop.org
Subject: Re: New F11 for the XO-1 build 5
To: Yioryos Asprobounitis mavrot...@yahoo.com
Cc: OLPC Development devel@lists.laptop.org, OLPC Testing
test...@lists.laptop.org, Fedora OLPC List
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 05:14:04AM -0400, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Martin Denglermar...@martindengler.com
wrote:
Like I said, I'd stop that behaviour when/if I get to it unless
someone beats me to it or explains why we want this.
Not sure about *that*
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 6:44 AM, Martin Denglermar...@martindengler.com wrote:
This thread segment is about SoaS now (a bit OT for devel@, I agree),
which is not doing anything like the initrd /versions hardlinking.
I am aware :-)
Read it as: the liveusb/livecd fedora thing uses the same
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 07:30:19AM -0400, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 6:44 AM, Martin Denglermar...@martindengler.com
wrote:
This thread segment is about SoaS now (a bit OT for devel@, I agree),
which is not doing anything like the initrd /versions hardlinking.
I am
yioryos wrote:
--- On Thu, 8/13/09, Paul Fox p...@laptop.org wrote:
From: Paul Fox p...@laptop.org
Subject: Re: New F11 for the XO-1 build 5
To: Yioryos Asprobounitis mavrot...@yahoo.com
Cc: OLPC Development devel@lists.laptop.org, OLPC Testing
test...@lists.laptop.org,
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 08:31:15AM -0400, Paul Fox wrote:
(it actually seems that the kernel might be treating the
daylight savings time field from the RTC a little too casually.)
chuckle. yes, it seems likely that setting everything to zero would be
seen to be the right thing to do ... but
Martin Dengler wrote:
Not sure about *that* mountpoint in particular, but a forest of
invisible tmpfs mounts is present in the XO image because we use
stateless Fedora.
This allows olpc-update to work its magic.
This thread segment is about SoaS now (a bit OT for devel@, I agree),
which
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 8:54 AM, James Cameronqu...@laptop.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 08:31:15AM -0400, Paul Fox wrote:
(it actually seems that the kernel might be treating the
daylight savings time field from the RTC a little too casually.)
chuckle. yes, it seems likely that setting
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 07:55:39AM -0400, Mikus Grinbergs wrote:
Martin Dengler wrote:
Not sure about *that* mountpoint in particular, but a forest of
invisible tmpfs mounts is present in the XO image because we use
stateless Fedora.
This allows olpc-update to work its magic.
This thread
Please join us in 5min reviewing the latest OLPC/Sugar community
projects over IRC Live Chat: (2PM EDT Boston Time Friday)
http://forum.laptop.org/chat
Then type at bottom:
/join #olpc-meeting
AGENDA:
* New projects libraries -- teaching them Community Outreach:
Seems one of my roles in life is to find all the oddities in Python.
Hints from truly experienced Pythonistas welcome.
I am finding that after I do
fh.seek(pos)
buf = fh.read(pagesz)
match = regexobj.search(buf)
the next fh.seek() will always be to _at least_ the end of the match.
I can
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Martin
Langhoffmartin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
Seems one of my roles in life is to find all the oddities in Python.
Hints from truly experienced Pythonistas welcome.
Feels good to blame Python, but after a walk outside I managed to get
it to seek backwards. And
Here is another strange thing, timezone info is not preserved through reboots
(this is
w/o _any_ network connection) and then hwclock and date although reported in
the same timezone they have
different time eg:
[r...@localhost olpc]# hwclock
Fri 14 Aug 2009 05:14:30 PM CEST -0.042609 seconds
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 19:22, Raul Gutierrez Segalesr...@rieder.net.py wrote:
Hi,
Has anybody experienced Sugar (0.82) freezing when trying to register
against the server? I was unable to register (although connectivity
seemed fine) and when sniffing the network I saw:
172.18.0.1.8080
15 matches
Mail list logo
