On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 5:04 AM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
I know I myself hacked the image-builder script into this direction,
but in hindsight I feel that it got too hacky and that was the wrong
approach. It presented various surprises along the way and at the very
end left me with
Thanks for looking into it. I didn't had to place my hear next to the
speaker, I noticed noise coming out one day while working on it late
at night. The lack of ambient noise made it pop out.
So... 120 to 360mW. Seems worth pursuing. Should I submit the trac ticket?
Best regards,
Tiago Marques
Submited as http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/9505
Best regards,
Tiago Marques
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Ed McNierney e...@laptop.org wrote:
Tiago -
Thanks, please do put that into trac.
Folks, in general it's time to start filling up trac. If you find anything
odd and it's not readily
I put some comments/ feedback up on the talk
page
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Talk:Python_Debugger_activity_for_the_XO
...
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 10:34 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
bmsch...@fas.harvard.edu wrote:
From: George Hunt georgejh...@gmail.com
I'm very excited to hear about this project,
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_XO-1
http://dev.laptop.org/~smparrish/XO-1/builds/OS8
This release includes a fix for the black box in Gnome, an updated repository
definition, and replaces Firefox with Midori.
If you still want to use Firefox you can always install it by doing a yum
install
2009/10/15 Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com:
Would be interesting to know more on concrete issues (that lead to the
feeling part :-) ).
I guess the turning point in my thinking was when I realised that I
had to update the .contents file inside the image after making
non-activity
hi Martin
Not ignoring you, just too busy.
do you remember this issue? Did you managed to get it built somehow?
http://www.redhat.com/archives/rhl-devel-list/2008-October/msg02908.html
We did end up with a F9 rpm, but I can't remember how it happened. The
rebuild for F11 is hitting the
