Re: Lots of broken chargers in Nicaragua

2010-01-29 Thread ismael schinca
I don't know if I can get an estimation of the number of broken chargers. I'll try and get it. I can certainly tell you as a fact that over 70% of the broken chargers suffer from this problem. The plug outlet is also a problem, but is not as big, and it seems that the problem has more to do with

Fuzzy screen problem in Nicaragua

2010-01-29 Thread Daniel Drake
away. Here is a video where you can see the problem clearly: http://dev.laptop.org/~dsd/20100129/fuzzy-screen.mpg (14mb) Is this a known/recognised problem? Any solutions or diagnosis available? cheers Daniel ___ Devel mailing list Devel

os201 ?

2010-01-29 Thread Mikus Grinbergs
os108 was announced.. Then os109 was announced as an upgrade to os108. In the meantime, there was os200, and now an os201. What are these ? mikus ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel

Re: B R E A K T H R O U G H -- F11-on-XO1 has working video player

2010-01-29 Thread Bernie Innocenti
On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 20:57 -0300, Bernie Innocenti wrote: In fact, this might not even be a 2.6.31 regression. To my (somewhat fuzzy) memory, automatic power management always has been disabled in OLPC's official builds due to similar reliability issues. Yesterday I played a little with

Re: os201 ?

2010-01-29 Thread Paul Fox
mikus wrote: os108 was announced.. Then os109 was announced as an upgrade to os108. In the meantime, there was os200, and now an os201. What are these ? the 200 series is the stable series, just as the 800 series was the stable series when we were doing development on 767, etc. the 200

Re: os201 ?

2010-01-29 Thread Chris Ball
Hi, os108 was announced.. Then os109 was announced as an upgrade to os108. In the meantime, there was os200, and now an os201. What are these ? os200 is a signed os108, and os201 is a signed os109 minus the Fedora 11 updates packages that were new to os109. (Testing is welcome on

Re: [Server-devel] Postfix vs ssmtp conflict on XS 0.6

2010-01-29 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Anna ascho...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks, Martin!  I was hoping it would be OK.  Sometimes I never know what's going to break when I start messing with things. :-) This hacky, crappy, inelegant script sends the recipient a simple email with I sometimes use a