Disclaimer: I am not asking for help; I am sharing my experience.
Was running a large 'yum' update to an XO1 with os11 installed -- it
failed, because 'yum' ran out of room in the '/' filesystem. I looked,
and it turned out that before this 'yum' run started, /dev/mtdblock0 had
been nearly 90%
On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 17:50 +, Martin Dengler wrote:
> Sorry if it's been answered already: I wonder why you prefer 0.88 on
> F11 for XO-1 builds, rather than 0.88 (or latest) on F12 (or latest)
> for XO-1 builds?
Stabilizing a new Fedora release on the XO-1 is likely to take more time
than I
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 07:43:33PM -0300, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> >From today's #sugar-meeting:
>
> bernie: I think a big problem to recruit 0.88 testers, is that there
> are no xo images
> bernie: scratch builds, like tomeu said, sounds good
> bernie: and then create a repo
> bernie: maybe
--- On Tue, 2/23/10, Paul Fox wrote:
> From: Paul Fox
> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Tiny Core Linux for XO-1 and XO-1.5
> To: "Yioryos Asprobounitis"
> Cc: "OLPC Devel"
> Date: Tuesday, February 23, 2010, 2:22 PM
> yioryos wrote:
> > I have also uploaded kernel rpms and srpms as well as
> the 3
