On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 09:31:25PM -0400, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 23:54 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
Bernie, I'm not sure the point of this point at this point in time. To
copy and paste part of the response I did to the other thread on
fedora-olpc for others benefit.
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 2:31 AM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 23:54 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
Bernie, I'm not sure the point of this point at this point in time. To
copy and paste part of the response I did to the other thread on
fedora-olpc for others
El Tue, 13 Apr 2010 09:40:27 +0800
Carlos Nazareno object...@gmail.com escribió:
Which of the 2 scenarios is constructionist?
How could you justify to not include source code?
That's evil. As evil as suggesting the use of a platform that children
would be unable to use if they wished to.
Hi, Martin,
Thanks for your reply. When you said to just install Flash, your brevity
actually was helpful. It made me think that maybe getting FlashPlayer to
run correctly on Sugar is a non-issue by now. I plan to retry the Flash and
browser downloads from the wiki. They seem to have been
How could you justify to not include source code?
That's evil. As evil as suggesting the use of a platform that children
would be unable to use if they wished to.
--
I'm really sorry for cluttering the list again, but I had to
immediately reply to this.
Some developers need to put food on
El Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:06:04 +0800
Carlos Nazareno object...@gmail.com escribió:
Some developers need to put food on the table and feed themselves and
their family.
Do you think that's evil?
As long as they distribute their software as free software, it's a good
thing. Distributing non-free
On 13.04.2010, at 11:06, Carlos Nazareno wrote:
I'm sorry if I offended you guys
At this point you're not even offensive anymore, just pitiable.
We're not demanding anyone is giving away anything for free. We simply choose
to do that ourselves, and we want to enable others to do the same, so
On 13/04/2010 10:42, Ismael Luceno wrote:
El Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:06:04 +0800
Carlos Nazarenoobject...@gmail.com escribió:
Some developers need to put food on the table and feed themselves and
their family.
Do you think that's evil?
As long as they distribute their software as free
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:38:40AM +0800, Carlos Nazareno wrote:
I know a lot of us would rather date the less attractive girl over the
dumb blonde, but are you guys saying the smart blonde is less hawt?
(go Natalie Portman!)
OK, you're definitely starting to offend people. Please stop it.
We're not demanding anyone is giving away anything for free. We simply
choose to do that ourselves, and we want to enable others to do the same, so
we make available everything someone else might need to build on our work.
But nobody is forcing you to do as we do, so don't whine.
I'm fine
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 12:47 AM, Stanley Sokolow
stanleysoko...@gmail.com wrote:
maybe getting FlashPlayer to
run correctly on Sugar is a non-issue by now
I think it Just Works, but if there are technical issues we will be
interested in hearing about them and exploring solutions. Let us know
On 12 April 2010 19:13, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
That's because of the exim. Do a 'yum install ssmtp' then a 'yum
remove exim' and most of that problem goes away. the auto depsolving
for '/usr/bin/sendmail' get exim by default because its the shortest
name and comes first.
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
On 12 April 2010 19:13, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
That's because of the exim. Do a 'yum install ssmtp' then a 'yum
remove exim' and most of that problem goes away. the auto depsolving
for '/usr/bin/sendmail'
Carlos,
This was posted to the wrong list. Please post
questions about constructivist learning to IEAP
i...@lists.sugarlabs.org where people
who study education can provide a real answer.
wad
On Apr 12, 2010, at 9:40 PM, Carlos Nazareno wrote:
Questions:
A) Syntax vs. Algorithms
Hi,
exist some study for adobe FLASH on sugar 0.82 and XO 1.0 ?
requirements? considerations to develop activities?
thanks
Esteban.
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Hi Esteban
Take a look at the eatboom activity, it's an sketch to develop
activities based on .swf files, thanks to the work of tomeu and
wadeb.
http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/addon/4225
i use it to make
http://people.sugarlabs.org/rafael/CuerpoHumano-1.xo
hth.
Rafael Ortiz
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:59, Rafael Enrique Ortiz Guerrero
dir...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Esteban
Take a look at the eatboom activity, it's an sketch to develop
activities based on .swf files, thanks to the work of tomeu and
wadeb.
http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/addon/4225
i
I just got 2 know about the X-Oand its activities, and i'm rily interested in
creating an activity that will help these young kids to get more creative and
innovativeI just wanna ask..where do i start from?...learn python or
what?...i'm a bit conversant with php, java, C++ and visual
exist some study for adobe FLASH on sugar 0.82 and XO 1.0 ?
requirements? considerations to develop activities?
Hola Esteban!
Check out the Wiki entry we started here on Flash Edu-game dev for the XO:
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Projects/Flash_Gamedev
We'll be updating the wiki soon.
-Naz
--
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 12:32 PM, sonubi seun checkmii4r...@yahoo.com wrote:
I just got 2 know about the X-Oand its activities, and i'm rily interested
in creating an activity that will help these young kids to get more creative
and innovativeI just wanna ask..where do i start from?...learn
Hi!
Did anyone get libertas_tf on XO-1 working with recent kernels (from git
branch olpc-2.6.31-updates)?
For me it refuses to work at all in managed and ibss modes. In monitor
mode, it causes sshd and ip link set wlan1 up resp. ifconfig wlan1
up to hang when executing one of the latter.
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 10:27 PM, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote:
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_1.5
http://build.laptop.org/10.2.0/os119
Compressed image size: 678.36mb (+0.01mb since build 118)
Description of changes in this build:
* kernel: allow negotiation of 5/10/15/30fps
Hi,
I updated my XO-1.5s to 119 yesterday and was surprised to see
that the screen rotation button still doesn't seem to
work. Looking through the mailing-lists I didn't find any
discussion about this topic which kinda surprised me.
The openchrome driver hasn't previously had
http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/9350 (xrandr screen rotation support) is
still being worked. We did try with software frame buffer rotation
enabled, but it did not perform well.
--
James Cameron
http://quozl.linux.org.au/
___
Devel mailing list
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 1:27 AM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/9350 (xrandr screen rotation support) is
still being worked. We did try with software frame buffer rotation
enabled, but it did not perform well.
--
James Cameron
http://quozl.linux.org.au/
I've changed the Content-Type returned by dev.laptop.org and
build.laptop.org and other virtual hosts for a few file types:
application/octet-stream for .zd .zsp .lzma .toc .iso and .rom
text/plain for .md5
I'm not aware of any likely side-effects, but let me know if you find
any.
--
James
Hi list,
Working iwth the La Rioja team, I rolled a new moodle-xs RPM that can
pick $CFG overrides from files dropped in /etc/moodle/conf.d/ .
Right now we're using it here to install a langpack and set it as
default. But it can naturally be used for other advanced configs
without messing with
27 matches
Mail list logo
