yioryos wrote:
--- On Mon, 4/26/10, Paul Fox p...@laptop.org wrote:
From: Paul Fox p...@laptop.org
Subject: Re: New XO-1.5 10.2.0 build 121
To: Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com
Cc: Devel devel@lists.laptop.org, Fedora OLPC
fedora-olpc-l...@redhat.com, Tiago
Hi,
Using VncLauncher-4 on F11: it fails to start the VNC server because
the binary links against the wrong version of libssl.
This activity is used very often in deployments for presentations,
training sessions, etc, so it would be nice to have a new version.
Daniel
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
Hi,
Using VncLauncher-4 on F11: it fails to start the VNC server because
the binary links against the wrong version of libssl.
This activity is used very often in deployments for presentations,
training sessions, etc, so
The recent changes to antitheft-related scripts and various bugfixen
are now rolled into a new RPM for F-9 (available in the olpcxs-testing
repo), and I have also rolled a F11 RPM that works well in F12 as
well.
Unfortunately, Daniel's work to make the binaries use nice dynamically
loaded
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 8:44 AM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
http://fedora.laptop.org/xs/stable/olpc/xs-0.6/i386/xs-activation-0.2.39.g2277cdf-1.xs9.noarch.rpm
Setup a yum repo pointing at
I noticed something interesting with he stopwatch activity on the XO
1.5 C2 with build 120. When the XO goes into suspend, the clock stops
display, but upon resume, will show actual time elapsed (clock keep
counting). Mark also works correctly, displaying the time when the
Mark button is clicked,
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010, Sameer Verma wrote:
I noticed something interesting with he stopwatch activity on the XO
1.5 C2 with build 120. When the XO goes into suspend, the clock stops
display, but upon resume, will show actual time elapsed (clock keep
counting). Mark also works correctly,
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 8:00 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
bmsch...@fas.harvard.edu wrote:
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010, Sameer Verma wrote:
I noticed something interesting with he stopwatch activity on the XO
1.5 C2 with build 120. When the XO goes into suspend, the clock stops
display, but upon resume,
http://fedora.laptop.org/xs/stable/olpc/xs-0.6/i386/xs-activation-0.2.39.g2277cdf-1.xs9.noarch.rpm
Straightforward rpm -ivh of the RPM gives dependency errors. It needs:
olpc-contents
python = 2.5
python-json
usbmount
xs-tools
olpc-contents and python-json easily installed by yum.
xs-tools
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
http://fedora.laptop.org/xs/stable/olpc/xs-0.6/i386/xs-activation-0.2.39.g2277cdf-1.xs9.noarch.rpm
Straightforward rpm -ivh of the RPM gives dependency errors. It needs:
olpc-contents
python = 2.5
python-json
usbmount
On 27 April 2010 10:34, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
Does a recompile of this against a F-12 system not fix the python 2.5
- 2.6 problem?
Probably yes, but not so sure I want to leave such a task in the hands
of the deployment here, as this is something that will have to be
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 8:44 AM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
http://fedora.laptop.org/xs/stable/olpc/xs-0.6/i386/xs-activation-0.2.39.g2277cdf-1.xs9.noarch.rpm
On my list for today (together with olpc-bios-crypto). A rebuild of
the srpm will probably fail because in the F9 series, the
Curious - I see in your makefile and spec fixups you've changes the
obc-* symlinks from abs to relative. Is it better in some sense in the
context of an RPM?
(A quick check if my /usr/*bin/ on F9 build box shows a mix of abs and rel).
cheers,
m
--
martin.langh...@gmail.com
mar...@laptop.org
On 27 April 2010 11:44, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
Curious - I see in your makefile and spec fixups you've changes the
obc-* symlinks from abs to relative. Is it better in some sense in the
context of an RPM?
Can't recall, but I suspect it would have been something in
On 27 April 2010 11:51, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
On 27 April 2010 11:44, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
Curious - I see in your makefile and spec fixups you've changes the
obc-* symlinks from abs to relative. Is it better in some sense in the
context of an RPM?
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
Now I recall. I was bringing it (and the spec) in line with normal
packaging:
Thanks for the clarification. Many Fedora pkgs have abs symlinks though.
I can see why it is tricky to differentiate between the target path in
Hola a todos
he notado que en algunas computadoras de escritorio especialmente con las
DELL
esta vez trate de instalar el XS en una DELL y el mensaje que aparece es
SELinux: Could not open police file =
/etc/selinux/targeted/policy/policy/policy.23: No such file or directory
Unable to load
17 matches
Mail list logo
