Re: [IAEP] Announcing the OLPC OS 10.1.2 final release!

Thank you to everyone who worked on this! I'm working on aggregating information that I'm getting from the wiki pages into a step-by-step guide in preparation for our pilot in the Philippines. I have a few questions: In http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Firmware , it says " Upgrading the XO

RE: Question on Fedora 13 LiveCD install on hard disk?

Original Fedora 13 can not be installed on Geode platform(glibc reason). So I built an LiveCD with an customized ks file and use livecd-create to burn it to an CD, then use livecd-iso-to-disk to put it on a USB stick. It can successfully boot up to the FC13 desktop using this USB stick. But what

Ubuntu on XO-1.5

Announcing XO-1.5 Ubuntu desktop and minimal builds, based on 10.04 "lucid" and the "maverick" testing suite that should lead to 10.10. The desktop build is GNOME based, is 284 MB compressed, 814 MB installed, and is built on a 2 GB partition size. The minimal build avoids X and contains only tex

Re: SD/MMC cards, a year later

On Aug 18, 2010, at 11:24 PM, John Watlington wrote: > While the SOC being used in XO-1.75 does have a "raw" NAND > Flash interface, it's design faces the same problem as the > CaFE in XO-1 --- it will only be useful for today's (yesterday's) > NAND Flash parts. It has been confirmed that the ra

Question on Fedora 13 LiveCD install on hard disk?

Hi, all I create a Fedora 13 Live CD and it can boot using CD-ROM. When I click the "Install to Hard Disk" in Menu, I got the error " DBusException: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.AccessDenied: Interface "org.freedesktop.NetworkManager". I check this error, it has been reported on https://bugzi

Re: Assignment of Network Interface Names

On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 02:03:40PM -0500, Mikus Grinbergs wrote: > The F14 developers' build assigns the radio as interface 'wlan0'. > Thereby, it is my ethernet that gets assigned interface name 'eth0'. Yes, irritating isn't it? -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ __

Re: [support-gang] [IAEP] Announcing the OLPC OS 10.1.2 final release!

On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 12:16:01PM -0700, Cherry Withers wrote: > When I updated to the new Sugar [OLPC OS] release of 852, the Firmware > stayed in its old version of Q3A36. Was external power connected at the time of a reboot? Only then will firmware be updated. If not, it's a bug, and I'll ne

Re: Initial F14 developers-only release for XO and XO-1.5

El Wed, 01-09-2010 a las 15:55 -0300, Martin Langhoff escribió: > can you spin a F11 RPM of 2.11.9? If it's much improved, and a good > testing shows it has no regressions, it's a candidate for 10.1.3. Enjoy: rpm -Uvh http://download.sugarlabs.org/dextrose/testing/dxo2/rpms/i386/os/xorg-x11-dr

Re: Initial F14 developers-only release for XO and XO-1.5

--- On Wed, 9/1/10, Martin Langhoff wrote: > From: Martin Langhoff > Subject: Re: Initial F14 developers-only release for XO and XO-1.5 > To: "Yioryos Asprobounitis" > Cc: "Daniel Drake" , "OLPC Devel" , > "Bernie Innocenti" , "fedora-olpc-list" > > Date: Wednesday, September 1, 2010, 2:55

Re: Initial F14 developers-only release for XO and XO-1.5

On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote: >> > This driver should be ported to F11/10.1.2 ASAP. Is >> day and night compared to 2.11.8 when I run it in puppy. The >> XO-1 is like a new machine. >> > pls do _not_ wait for 10.1.3 >> >> That's impossible. 10.1.2 has been released.

Re: WiFi vs suspend

> is this still consistent for you? No, it started hanging again shortly after I sent that message. :( ?? > i've just released a new powerd-27 which contains a fix for XO-1 which might > affect whether power to the wlan is maintained in some cases, and might also > cause wake-on-wlan to be dis

Assignment of Network Interface Names

Disclaimer: I am not asking for help; I am just sharing my experiences I don't have an Access Point - instead, I mainly use ethernet for connectivity. Way back with Joyride builds, sometimes it was the ethernet instead of the radio that got assigned as interface 'eth0'. For consistency, I ended u

Re: Initial F14 developers-only release for XO and XO-1.5

--- On Wed, 9/1/10, Daniel Drake wrote: > From: Daniel Drake > Subject: Re: Initial F14 developers-only release for XO and XO-1.5 > To: "Yioryos Asprobounitis" > Cc: "Bernie Innocenti" , mi...@bga.com, "OLPC Devel" > , "fedora-olpc-list" > Date: Wednesday, September 1, 2010, 12:16 PM > On 1

Re: Initial F14 developers-only release for XO and XO-1.5

On 1 September 2010 10:14, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote: > This driver should be ported to F11/10.1.2 ASAP. Is day and night compared to > 2.11.8 when I run it in puppy. The XO-1 is like a new machine. > pls do _not_ wait for 10.1.3 That's impossible. 10.1.2 has been released. Daniel ___

Re: Initial F14 developers-only release for XO and XO-1.5

--- On Wed, 9/1/10, Mikus Grinbergs wrote: > > I recommend rebasing on the geode driver 2.11.9, which > was just released > > by upstream. I've been testing it in Dextrose for > about 3 weeks: it > > fixes all the known rendering bugs and has no > regressions. > > The XO-1 os1 build already h

Re: WiFi vs suspend

hal wrote: > > I have blundered into what may be a workaround for bug 10232 > http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/10232 > > The fix is to edit > /usr/share/dbus-1/system-services/fi.epitest.hostap.WPASupplicant.service > and add " -dddt" to the end of the Exec line. It ends up looking like:

Re: Initial F14 developers-only release for XO and XO-1.5

On 1 September 2010 00:49, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: > With the kernel nearing a recent release is there any plans to get a > chunk of the kernel patches upstream to ease on going maintenance? I cleaned up the history a lot, which is the first big step in doing this. It's a task I'd be interest

Re: Initial F14 developers-only release for XO and XO-1.5

>> the XO-1.5 camera doesn't work, there are some funky graphics bugs on >> XO-1, no power management, DCON doesn't work right on either laptop, >> desktop switching lands you at a blank screen. > > I recommend rebasing on the geode driver 2.11.9, which was just released > by upstream. I've been t

Re: Initial F14 developers-only release for XO and XO-1.5

El Tue, 31-08-2010 a las 23:22 -0600, Daniel Drake escribió: > Things are in such an early stage that I'm labelling this as a > developers-only release. To name a few: Sugar crashes all the time, > the XO-1.5 camera doesn't work, there are some funky graphics bugs on > XO-1, no power management, DC

Re: Initial F14 developers-only release for XO and XO-1.5

Booted ok on XO-1. At its current level, this system is already usable. [Was even able to apply my customizations, except for doing editing.] In Terminal, cursor movement keys don't work. [I also saw interference to Terminal (white background) from dmesg? lines (black background), after each bo

Re: Announcing the OLPC OS 10.1.2 final release!

El Mon, 30-08-2010 a las 21:00 -0400, Chris Ball escribió: > I'm very pleased to announce build os852 as the final 10.1.2 release > build for XO-1 and XO-1.5 laptops. >[...] Kudos! Shouldn't this go to devel-annou...@lists.laptop.org as well? -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/

Re: Sugar and NetworkManager

El Mon, 30-08-2010 a las 11:12 +1000, James Cameron escribió: > On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 08:21:30AM +1000, fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote: > > Can I suggest a related issue and alteration to this strategy? Is it > > possible to easily forget a connection? > > In Sugar 0.84, just right-click on the i

Re: Initial F14 developers-only release for XO and XO-1.5

This is awesome news, kudos to Daniel. On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 08:49, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: > Hey Daniel, > > Yippee! I suspect the sugar starting issues is the same one we're > seeing in SoaS for F-14. Hmm, I had some trouble on mainstream F-14 booting both Sugar and GNOME (actually, even