On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 15:30 +1100, James Cameron wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 06:09:02PM -0600, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> > That actually makes things worse, try installing ntpdate and run it with
> > the stock /etc/adjtime file, now the real time clock is set to localtime
> > as that is the first t
Hey guys.
I haven't taken that much look into foot pedal chargers and do know
what their internals look like -- I just remembered coming across the
link I posted so I shared The efficient way to do a foot pedal powered
generator would probably be to have a small weighted wheel spin as a
dynamo whe
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 06:09:02PM -0600, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> That actually makes things worse, try installing ntpdate and run it with
> the stock /etc/adjtime file, now the real time clock is set to localtime
> as that is the first time hwclock is run.
>
> http://osdir.com/ml/fedora-olpc-list/20
>
> Is there really no way to know when the Record activity is "upside down" on
> the 10.1.3 xo (and as a result xvimagesink in the wrong place)?
>
Your question is a bit unclear so here are a few scenarios and answers.
If you are looking to query what the current rotation of the screen is
then y
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 5:01 PM, John Gilmore wrote:
>> Please post any ideas here, and they'll be considered when we come to
>> plan which features we'll aim to include.
>
> Well, the obvious one is to actually implement the real idle suspend
> that happens in between keystrokes, turning off the
> Please post any ideas here, and they'll be considered when we come to
> plan which features we'll aim to include.
Well, the obvious one is to actually implement the real idle suspend
that happens in between keystrokes, turning off the CPU to save massive
amounts of power, while keeping the scree
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 14:40 -0500, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 8:02 AM, Sridhar Dhanapalan
> wrote:
> > We've actually disabled the /sbin/hwclock --systohc in our latest
> > build (probably to be released tomorrow).
>
> If you are spinning your own build, ensure ntpdate is in
greenf...@laptop.org said:
> I am starting work on a set of test cases to use for the Fedora 14 x86
> (XO-1.0 & 1.5) 11.2.0 build.
Neat/thanks.
How about making a list of IO devices that are likely to be used with a XO
and making sure they each get at least a quick test?
It's probably worth
On 26 January 2011 15:02, Daniel Drake wrote:
> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/11.2.0
>
> http://build.laptop.org/11.2.0/os6
Forgot to mention, there are some small changes in XO-1.5 output.
ZD files now include the target card size in the extension rather than
the prefix part of the filename.
e.g. os
Hi,
OLPC recently announced the development of a major new OLPC OS release
for XO-1 and XO-1.5:
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/11.2.0
We are seeking feedback and ideas from the community for feature
requests for the upcoming feature development stage. Feedback from
other parts of the community is welc
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 12:56 AM, Bakhtiar Mikhak wrote:
> The specific practical considerations on the XO to which I was referring
> has to do with the documented bug with xvimagesink and UI rotations. Even
> with the rest of the UI designed to handle rotations gracefully, this bug is
> a show st
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/11.2.0
http://build.laptop.org/11.2.0/os6
Fixed bugs:
#10606 Virtual change sets XO-1.5 default resolution to 1200x1200
Most activities are back.
Thanks for the feedback and bug reports so far.
Daniel
___
Devel mailing l
On 25 January 2011 15:17, Samuel Greenfeld wrote:
> I am starting work on a set of test cases to use for the Fedora 14 x86
> (XO-1.0 & 1.5) 11.2.0 build.
>
> Currently I am drafting a list of generic test scenarios we may wish to
> consider testing. That list is at http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Test_
13 matches
Mail list logo
