On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 12:47 AM, Carlos Nazareno wrote:
> Will Flash Flash Player & Java SE (not JavaME) run on the XO-1.75, it
> being non-x86?
>
> For Android, Flash Player requires an ARMv7 (Cortex) + to run.
>
> Flash Player 9 was running on the N900 which ran Maemo.
>
> Video calls & streami
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Alan Eliasen wrote:
> I considered it also a serious problem that the then-shipping
> configurations of the OLPC completely lacked fonts with glyphs for many
> languages (e.g. there were no fonts with Chinese or Japanese characters)
> so these languages could not
On 04/13/2011 05:47 PM, Carlos Nazareno wrote:
> Will Flash Flash Player & Java SE (not JavaME) run on the XO-1.75, it
> being non-x86?
You may look into trying to get "Java SE For Embedded" working. It
supposedly supports ARM architectures, but that's all I know about it.
http://www.oracle.c
On 14 April 2011 06:16, Mikus Grinbergs wrote:
> Unless the RAM chips on the XO-1.75 are socketed (and thus easily
> replaceable),
This seems unlikely. Socketing adds cost up front, and low cost is a
primary goal. Also the demand for upgrade would be relatively low.
> ... particularly memory-
> Hmm, it'd be interesting to see how much of a performance improvement
> webkit offers.
It's no big deal to run webkit-based browsers on the XO. For instance,
all of my XO-1s have Midori installed.
The question is - what is this "performance improvement" that you are
looking for? I believe t
On 14 April 2011 06:16, Mikus Grinbergs wrote:
>> Might 1GB of RAM become a performance bottleneck?
>
> I myself am skeptical of efforts to use the OLPC where a desktop system
> might be more effective. I've run various large applications on an XO-1.5
> system, and have not myself experienced "m
Will Flash Flash Player & Java SE (not JavaME) run on the XO-1.75, it
being non-x86?
For Android, Flash Player requires an ARMv7 (Cortex) + to run.
Flash Player 9 was running on the N900 which ran Maemo.
Video calls & streaming over internet is now one of the most important
uses for developing c
I think the best way to use an interactive whiteboard is to use Sugar
as a VirtualBox guest in full screen mode. I would not expect to use an
XO ... schools with interactive whiteboards tend also to have far better
laptops and computers available for teachers to use.
For learner display via inter
On 20 March 2011 11:32, Mitch Bradley wrote:
>
>
> On 3/20/2011 6:58 AM, Chris Ball wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 20 2011, Daniel Drake wrote:>
>>>
>>> 1. Is this approach a good idea?
>>
>> Sounds great to me.
>>
>>> 2. Are we bothered by a misleading WARNING message appearing at the
>>> end
[cc+=olpc-devel]
Hmm, it'd be interesting to see how much of a performance improvement
webkit offers.
Also, should we consider loading mobile versions of websites on the
XO-1? I don't know how good an alternative that might be.
Could be leverage the school server in some way? Any other ideas?
O
> Might 1GB of RAM become a performance bottleneck?
I myself am skeptical of efforts to use the OLPC where a desktop system
might be more effective. I've run various large applications on an
XO-1.5 system, and have not myself experienced "memory shortage".
Unless the RAM chips on the XO-1.75
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Sridhar Dhanapalan
wrote:
> Now that we have USB2VGA adapter support, has anyone tried an XO with
> an interactive whiteboard? These things are in every classroom here in
> Australia.
>
> I understand that there are different models that each work
> differently, an
For SmartBoards from http://smarttech.com Linux drivers are available.
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 7:18 PM, Martin Langhoff
wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Sridhar Dhanapalan
> wrote:
> > Now that we have USB2VGA adapter support, has anyone tried an XO with
> > an interactive whiteboard? These things are in every classroom here in
> > Australia.
>
> Not that I
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Sridhar Dhanapalan
wrote:
> Now that we have USB2VGA adapter support, has anyone tried an XO with
> an interactive whiteboard? These things are in every classroom here in
> Australia.
Not that I know of. But if there are reasonable ways to talk to them
from linux.
On 14 April 2011 02:21, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Sridhar Dhanapalan
> wrote:
>> According to http://wiki.laptop.org/go/XO-1.75 the XO-1.75 will have
>> 1GB of RAM
>
> That's... not quite the plan of record :-)
>
> I followed your link but could not find any such
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Sridhar Dhanapalan
wrote:
> According to http://wiki.laptop.org/go/XO-1.75 the XO-1.75 will have
> 1GB of RAM
That's... not quite the plan of record :-)
I followed your link but could not find any such statement... where
does it say so, so I can fix it?
regards
According to http://wiki.laptop.org/go/XO-1.75 the XO-1.75 will have
1GB of RAM. This is the same amount as in the XO-1.5. Might this
become a performance bottleneck? Might there be an option to purchase
units with more RAM?
Sridhar
___
Devel mailing lis
Now that we have USB2VGA adapter support, has anyone tried an XO with
an interactive whiteboard? These things are in every classroom here in
Australia.
I understand that there are different models that each work
differently, and their proprietary nature makes compatibility even
more difficult. I'v
19 matches
Mail list logo
