I have a FLOSS manuals question.
We use a Users Manual (PDF version of
the online one) for certification. In the case
of the High School laptop (with a non-membrane
keyboard), we need to alter the Users Manual
to match the laptop's specs.
As this modified manual would no longer be
applicable
Folks:
Might be over my head in the specific prelink OLPC talk here, but in my
experience on the iSeries - anything that optimizes a software update
process (which happens twice a year) at the expense of a program loads or
the object instantiation process (which happen thousands of times an hour)
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 07:45:49AM -0400, Kevin Gordon wrote:
Might be over my head in the specific prelink OLPC talk here, but in
my experience on the iSeries - anything that optimizes a software
update process (which happens twice a year) at the expense of a
program loads or the object
james wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 07:45:49AM -0400, Kevin Gordon wrote:
Might be over my head in the specific prelink OLPC talk here, but in
my experience on the iSeries - anything that optimizes a software
update process (which happens twice a year) at the expense of a
program
In general every major Fedora jump we do risks running out of space. In
addition to upgrades, they also did a mass recompile for the upcoming F15
release. As long as we use a hardlink/multiple-root/rsync approach, I do
not see an easy answer to this.
What seems to be missing (in this
Hi
I am looking for the source of the great multiplication tables animated
cartoon that someone used in their talk at eduJAM. Can anyone help me? This
was the one where the students were reciting the tables that were written on
the chalkboard then they were sitting in front of computer
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 08:13:18AM -0400, Paul Fox wrote:
but unless i misunderstood dsd, prelink is making our update process
non-functional.
I thought it only made the process slower than it should be, since
moving from one build to another will cause, for each binary affected by
prelink, a
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 09:51:33AM -0400, Samuel Greenfeld wrote:
What seems to be missing (in this discussion, and perhaps in the
utility) is support in the OS builder to incrementally update based on
a previous build.
Yes, and I mentioned recently the idea of applying an incremental .zd
james wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 08:13:18AM -0400, Paul Fox wrote:
but unless i misunderstood dsd, prelink is making our update process
non-functional.
I thought it only made the process slower than it should be, since
moving from one build to another will cause, for each binary
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Martin Abente
martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com wrote:
I still didn't make up my mind about which technical approach should I
take in order to get this working, but I guess people already started
sharing some ideas. And I would appreciate more ideas and discussion
10 matches
Mail list logo
