On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 10:38:27PM -0400, Kevin Gordon wrote:
> Still, pretty darn impressive.
That's just Fedora at work. Thank them. ;-)
--
James Cameron
http://quozl.linux.org.au/
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.o
All of the following USB modems work very nicely in 11.3:
Sierra Wireless 881
Novatel MC950D
Huawei E160
using an unlocked SIM.
Only thing I've found is that it seems to be best to install the modem after
boot, turn off wireless, enable broadband, configure them on the Gnome side
first, then g
Thanks Peter and Sameer
I was wrong to attribute the lag on Skype on Sugar 0.88 installed with
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Skype
to the installation, it works fine, it was internet lag
tried yum localinstall skype-2.2.0.35-fedora.i586.rpm on 11.3.0 OS2
but it fails:
"cannot retrieve repository meta
None of these included the most important wiki page:
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/XO_1.75_B1
This is where most of this information is already posted,
along with other things you should know about your 1.75 B1.
Cheers,
wad
On Aug 15, 2011, at 5:06 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> Quick notes from som
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 6:34 PM, James Cameron wrote:
> I can't see any olpc-update patches in repositories, perhaps you meant
> olpc-utils?
Yes of course. olpc-utils. Good catch, apologies.
m
--
martin.langh...@gmail.com
mar...@laptop.org -- Software Architect - OLPC
- ask interesting que
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 11:19 PM, Martin Langhoff
wrote:
> Peter, Gonzalo,
>
> The koji buildfarm is busted. On one of my XOs I've built csound by
> hand. It builds straight from the latest f14 spec, using `fedpkg
> local`.
Its not actually. Its that csound doesn't build with the specified
cflags
Peter, Gonzalo,
The koji buildfarm is busted. On one of my XOs I've built csound by
hand. It builds straight from the latest f14 spec, using `fedpkg
local`.
RPMs here - http://dev.laptop.org/~martin/public_rpms/f14-arm/ so
hopefully they'll land in the next build...
- Peter, do tell me if/when
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 05:40:54PM -0400, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On 1.75, looking at chosen/bootpath, as exposed by device-tree, shows
> the path prefixed with /sd@d428/ .
>
> Is that prefix stable? Does it refer to something (memory location)
> that might change?
Address of SDIO controller
Early xo 1.75 support was held back from being in 'master' by hacky
workarounds while we didn't have means to read mfg-data from OFW.
Now we do; workarounds are gone, patches landed.
cheers,
m
--
martin.langh...@gmail.com
mar...@laptop.org -- Software Architect - OLPC
- ask interesting que
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Paul Fox wrote:
> this information is easy to provide by using an exit code to mean
> "missing". probably should have done that in the first place.
> untested patch below.
If it tests alright, please go ahead and commit it :-)
> > You may also note that the she
Hi Mitch,
On 1.75, looking at chosen/bootpath, as exposed by device-tree, shows
the path prefixed with /sd@d428/ .
Is that prefix stable? Does it refer to something (memory location)
that might change?
We parse this value in the init scripts that mount the boot partition,
and in the initramf
Quick notes from some FAQs that have been bouncing over IRC...
(This is a lightly edited version of a great email by Simon -- thanks!)
When you receive the XO-1.75... it will NOT boot; it will only light
up the screen. You need to "unbrick" it with a serial adapter --
instructions at [1].
Once t
martin wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> I reworked your olpc-hwinfo slightly, refactored all the utilities
> reading /ofw . See
> http://dev.laptop.org/git/projects/olpc-utils/commit/
>
> My only concern is that it can't tell you whether ak/wp/ww tags
> _exist_. It can read values, but empty tags re
Hi Paul,
I reworked your olpc-hwinfo slightly, refactored all the utilities
reading /ofw . See
http://dev.laptop.org/git/projects/olpc-utils/commit/
My only concern is that it can't tell you whether ak/wp/ww tags
_exist_. It can read values, but empty tags return the same as a
missing tag. You ma
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Paul Fox wrote:
> sameer wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 5:26 AM, Paul Fox wrote:
> > > sameer wrote:
> > > > At the behest (more like pestering) of my mother, I installed Skype
> > > > (Fedora 13+ version) on a XO 1.5 with build 874 and it all works. Th
sameer wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 5:26 AM, Paul Fox wrote:
> > sameer wrote:
> > > At the behest (more like pestering) of my mother, I installed Skype
> > > (Fedora 13+ version) on a XO 1.5 with build 874 and it all works. This
> > > is on the GNOME side. Both audio and video. I'm go
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 5:50 AM, wrote:
>> but just to tag this thread with a version number, i'm guessing
>> you installed skype-2.2.0.35-fedora.i586.rpm ? i'll give it a try.
>
> i think thats the file i tried today, it had a missing dependency, qt, on
> both 0.88 (373pyg) and 0.92 (870)
>
>
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 5:26 AM, Paul Fox wrote:
> sameer wrote:
> > At the behest (more like pestering) of my mother, I installed Skype
> > (Fedora 13+ version) on a XO 1.5 with build 874 and it all works. This
> > is on the GNOME side. Both audio and video. I'm going to add a +1 in
>
> too la
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 1:50 PM, wrote:
>> but just to tag this thread with a version number, i'm guessing
>> you installed skype-2.2.0.35-fedora.i586.rpm ? i'll give it a try.
>
> i think thats the file i tried today, it had a missing dependency, qt, on
> both 0.88 (373pyg) and 0.92 (870)
>
>
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> The Peter's first release with Fedora Secondary Mirrors goodness plus
> much more release!
Yay!
(Can we have the next one be called os37 or os38??? ;-) )
m
--
martin.langh...@gmail.com
mar...@laptop.org -- Software Architect - OLPC
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Sameer Verma wrote:
> At the behest (more like pestering) of my mother, I installed Skype
> (Fedora 13+ version) on a XO 1.5 with build 874 and it all works. This
> is on the GNOME side. Both audio and video. I'm going to add a +1 in
> my mother's contribution colu
> but just to tag this thread with a version number, i'm guessing
> you installed skype-2.2.0.35-fedora.i586.rpm ? i'll give it a try.
i think thats the file i tried today, it had a missing dependency, qt, on both
0.88 (373pyg) and 0.92 (870)
so i tried http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Skype
http://ww
sameer wrote:
> At the behest (more like pestering) of my mother, I installed Skype
> (Fedora 13+ version) on a XO 1.5 with build 874 and it all works. This
> is on the GNOME side. Both audio and video. I'm going to add a +1 in
too late! everyone's switched to google+. ;-)
but just to tag th
23 matches
Mail list logo
