Re: 11.3.1 development build 32 for XO-1.75, XO-1.5 and XO-1

2012-03-30 Thread John Watlington

os32 seems to dump core on XO-1.75 if the serial console is enabled either via 
the
enable-serial value in olpc.fth or by holding down the check key.

Bummer,
wad

On Mar 29, 2012, at 4:56 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote:

 This build brings fixes to powerd and OFW on all platforms. XO-1.75
 gets a kernel fix for Libertas reset.
 
 Updatable via olpc-update -- try the cmdline below.
 
 Notes:
 
  - On XO-1.75 the getty on the serial port is _disabled_ by default now 
 (that's
 the workaround). It gets enabled when you hold the check game key
 during boot (for verbose boot).
 
 Upgrade online with:
 
   olpc-update 11.3.1_xo1.75-32
  olpc-update 11.3.1_xo1.5-32
  olpc-update 11.3.1_xo1-32
 
 Download from:
 
   http://build.laptop.org/11.3.1/os32/
 
 Fixes (please help us confirm):
 
 #11730: Libertas: command timeout, does not recover
 #11723: OFW XO-1.75 - only escape key should escape to prompt
 
 Changes XO-1.75:
 
 -kernel-3.0.19_xo1.75-20120320.1540.olpc.7e610e7.armv7l
 +kernel-3.0.19_xo1.75-20120321.1512.olpc.1398916.armv7l
 -olpc-firmware-q4d05-1.unsigned.noarch
 +olpc-firmware-q4d08-1.unsigned.noarch
 -olpc-powerd-46-1.fc14.armv5tel
 -olpc-powerd-dbus-46-1.fc14.armv5tel
 +olpc-powerd-47-1.fc14.armv5tel
 +olpc-powerd-dbus-47-1.fc14.armv5tel
 
 Changes XO-1.5:
 
 -olpc-firmware-q3c02-1.unsigned.noarch
 +olpc-firmware-q3c03-1.unsigned.noarch
 -olpc-powerd-46-1.fc14.i686
 -olpc-powerd-dbus-46-1.fc14.i686
 +olpc-powerd-47-1.fc14.i686
 +olpc-powerd-dbus-47-1.fc14.i686
 
 Changes XO-1:
 
 -olpc-firmware-q2f07-1.unsigned.noarch
 +olpc-firmware-q2f08-1.unsigned.noarch
 -olpc-powerd-46-1.fc14.i686
 -olpc-powerd-dbus-46-1.fc14.i686
 +olpc-powerd-47-1.fc14.i686
 +olpc-powerd-dbus-47-1.fc14.i686
 
 Kernel changelog XO-1.75
 
 Daniel Drake (1):
  libertas: add sd8686 reset_card support
 
 cheers,
 
 
 
 m
 --
  mar...@laptop.org -- Software Architect - OLPC
  - ask interesting questions
  - don't get distracted with shiny stuff  - working code first
  - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
 ___
 Devel mailing list
 Devel@lists.laptop.org
 http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
 

___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: [Server-devel] xs-pkgs

2012-03-30 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Mar 29, 2012 5:52 PM, Tim Moody timmo...@sympatico.ca wrote:
 (btw installing straight from cd never worked for me as it failed on the
disk partitioning regardless of the options I chose)

I've seen that happen when the disk has strange partitioning information.
Anaconda queries the disk, gets confused, and eventually dies. We had this
after trying to use a HW RAID, and then abandoning that plan for SW RAID.
The RAID controller had written some odd partitioning data on the disks.

Can't remember what we did to un-jinx it. Probably switched to a VT early
under the installer and used fdisk to write some bog-standard partition
anaconda could make sense of :-)

m
___
Server-devel mailing list
Server-devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel


Re: [Server-devel] xs-pkgs

2012-03-30 Thread Tim Moody
funny thing is that it works fine under cobbler.  anaconda offered to 
reinitialize the partition and I let it, but still didn't help.


From: Martin Langhoff 
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2012 7:04 AM
To: Tim Moody 
Cc: server-devel@lists.laptop.org 
Subject: Re: [Server-devel] xs-pkgs



On Mar 29, 2012 5:52 PM, Tim Moody timmo...@sympatico.ca wrote:
 (btw installing straight from cd never worked for me as it failed on the disk 
 partitioning regardless of the options I chose) 

I've seen that happen when the disk has strange partitioning information. 
Anaconda queries the disk, gets confused, and eventually dies. We had this 
after trying to use a HW RAID, and then abandoning that plan for SW RAID. The 
RAID controller had written some odd partitioning data on the disks.

Can't remember what we did to un-jinx it. Probably switched to a VT early under 
the installer and used fdisk to write some bog-standard partition anaconda 
could make sense of :-)



m
___
Server-devel mailing list
Server-devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel


Re: [Server-devel] xs-pkgs

2012-03-30 Thread Tim Moody
(btw installing straight from cd never worked for me as it failed on the 
disk partitioning regardless of the options I chose) 



From a kickstart file or by hand in the installer?


using the cd and taking the kickstart option.


Jerry



___
Server-devel mailing list
Server-devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel


Re: [Server-devel] xs-pkgs

2012-03-30 Thread Samuel Greenfeld
In our local case, the deployment purchased a supposedly RHEL-compliant
server which lacked a Linux driver for its built-in RAID controller.

This RAID controller created disk partitions which spanned the full size of
each disk drive.  These partitions appeared when the lower-level disk
controller(s) were accessed directly after the RAID controller was turned
off, and caused anaconda to die whenever it tried to figure out a
partitioning scheme with already-full disks.

Fdisk was used to delete these partitions from a Linux terminal console,
and then anaconda was happy.

The inverse situation also needs to be watched out for: If you are using a
Linux-supported hardware RAID controller, the individual disks/controllers
below it may still be accessible, and installing directly on those could
make the RAID controller unhappy.


On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Tim Moody timmo...@sympatico.ca wrote:

  (btw installing straight from cd never worked for me as it failed on the
 disk partitioning regardless of the options I chose)


 From a kickstart file or by hand in the installer?


 using the cd and taking the kickstart option.


 Jerry


  __**_
 Server-devel mailing list
 Server-devel@lists.laptop.org
 http://lists.laptop.org/**listinfo/server-develhttp://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel

___
Server-devel mailing list
Server-devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel


Re: [Server-devel] xs-pkgs

2012-03-30 Thread Tim Moody


That is not a package, the @ makes it a group definition in the
*comps.xml file in /repodata on the XS iso image. You must loopback
mount the iso to view the file, then have a look for that string.



Well, you're right as usual.  (also I said xs-pkgs remembering 0.6, when I 
should have said olpc-xs).


I found a file 
'83aa5dc6a7d65fb600d12d70ec102379a719c6bad8b6acc5c0276a8439ad251f-OLPC 
School Server-0.7-comps.xml'


in which I found

 group
  idolpc-xs/id
  defaulttrue/default
  uservisibletrue/uservisible
  display_order1024/display_order
  nameOLPC XS/name
  descriptionThis group is the XS server group of packages/description
   packagelist
 packagereq type=mandatoryds-backup-server/packagereq
 packagereq type=mandatoryidmgr/packagereq
 packagereq type=mandatorymoodle-xs/packagereq
 packagereq type=mandatoryolpc-bios-crypto/packagereq
 packagereq type=mandatoryusbmount/packagereq
 packagereq type=mandatoryxs-activation/packagereq
 packagereq type=mandatoryxs-activity-server/packagereq
 packagereq type=mandatoryxs-config/packagereq
 packagereq type=mandatoryxs-rsync/packagereq
 packagereq type=mandatoryxs-tools/packagereq
 packagereq type=defaultacpid/packagereq
 packagereq type=defaultntp/packagereq
 packagereq type=defaultpuppet/packagereq
   /packagelist
 /group

Still don't know why this didn't install.  The  anaconda-ks.cfg after the 
install only shows the following.  Does the XS need to be able to reach the 
internet in order for the install to succeed?


%packages
@Base
@Core

%end

so it looks like these didn't install

@system-admin-tools
@olpc-xs
xs-release
epel-release

yum groupinstall OLPC XS only succeeded after I deleted everything in 
/etc/yum.repos.d/ except my local repo.  This included external mirrors for 
Centos and olpcxs.  How do they get into this directory?






___
Server-devel mailing list
Server-devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel