The approach I have taken with other releases is to flash the NAND, add
some activities with a customization stick [1], and then use the
NAND-blaster to copy the image to all our laptops. When I try the
customization stick, there is some python exception, but the screen
powers off almost
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:13:22PM +0530, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
The approach I have taken with other releases is to flash the NAND, add
some activities with a customization stick [1], and then use the
NAND-blaster to copy the image to all our laptops. When I try the
customization stick,
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Joshua N Pritikin jpriti...@pobox.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:13:22PM +0530, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
The approach I have taken with other releases is to flash the NAND, add
some activities with a customization stick [1], and then use the
NAND-blaster
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:43 AM, Joshua N Pritikin jpriti...@pobox.com wrote:
The approach I have taken with other releases is to flash the NAND, add
some activities with a customization stick [1], and then use the
NAND-blaster to copy the image to all our laptops. When I try the
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 08:30:43AM -0600, Daniel Drake wrote:
The customisation stick has been somewhat problematic for a while now,
and starting in 2010 we started to move to the direction where image
customisation should be done by making your own image (which is much
easier than before). Is
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Joshua N Pritikin jpriti...@pobox.com wrote:
Yeah, I agree that is a better approach. Can you add the info for
12.1.10 to that page?
It will automatically appear when 12.1.0 gets released.
For now you need to use the development version:
Hi All:
I would like to propose a feature for discussion and inclusion in the
0.98 cycle is packaging all control-panel applets as rpms. As this
discussion does not impact the UI and more of a packaging issue I'm an
not creating a Features page. The discussion can take place here on the
On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 15:31 -0400, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Jerry Vonau jvo...@shaw.ca wrote:
after the first pass of OOB, so why bother with the upstream patches.
Yum has good support for it already. Avoiding upstream would require
torturing yum first to
www.engadget.com/2012/07/26/olpc-xo-touch-1-75-to-use-neonode-tech/
The post says as yet unreleased XO 1.75. What's the official status
on the 1.75? Still as yet unreleased?
cheers,
Sameer
--
Sameer Verma, Ph.D.
Professor, Information Systems
San Francisco State University
On Jul 26, 2012, at 11:09 PM, Sameer Verma wrote:
www.engadget.com/2012/07/26/olpc-xo-touch-1-75-to-use-neonode-tech/
The post says as yet unreleased XO 1.75. What's the official status
on the 1.75? Still as yet unreleased?
It's been shipping for some time now.
I don't know where they got
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:15:50PM -0400, John Watlington wrote:
On Jul 26, 2012, at 11:09 PM, Sameer Verma wrote:
www.engadget.com/2012/07/26/olpc-xo-touch-1-75-to-use-neonode-tech/
The post says as yet unreleased XO 1.75. What's the official status
on the 1.75? Still as yet
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 8:15 PM, John Watlington w...@laptop.org wrote:
On Jul 26, 2012, at 11:09 PM, Sameer Verma wrote:
www.engadget.com/2012/07/26/olpc-xo-touch-1-75-to-use-neonode-tech/
The post says as yet unreleased XO 1.75. What's the official status
on the 1.75? Still as yet
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Mike Lee curious...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's a cool demo of the Neonode multitouch frame:
http://www.slashgear.com/neonode-3d-touch-headed-to-tablets-and-phones-hands-on-28215933/
Not only multi-touch, but also entry direction and tilt. For a dollar!
Seems
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 08:38:00PM -0700, Sameer Verma wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Mike Lee curious...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's a cool demo of the Neonode multitouch frame:
http://www.slashgear.com/neonode-3d-touch-headed-to-tablets-and-phones-hands-on-28215933/
Not only
Hi All:
Just looking at the current 0.96-3 src.rpm for sugar and wondering if
sugar-gnomekeyring.patch should be somewhere else other than in the
sugar package. This is a one time configuration that the olpc-utils[1]
package currently handles. Perhaps olpc-utils would be a better place
for this
15 matches
Mail list logo
