Don't go there.
It is hard to talk about the resolution of the PixelQi display.
In BW mode, it is 1200 x 900.In color mode, it is something
closer to 690 x 520, but the human visual system has much
less color resolution anyway so it appears sharper.
MLJ did a great job of matching the display
On 28 July 2012 13:51, James Cameron wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 09:45:04PM -0400, Chris Leonard wrote:
>> IANAL, but the term "Retina" in reference to computers and mobile
>> devices is an Apple trademark, so any such use (referring to anything
>> but an Apple device) would be violating thei
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 09:45:04PM -0400, Chris Leonard wrote:
> IANAL, but the term "Retina" in reference to computers and mobile
> devices is an Apple trademark, so any such use (referring to anything
> but an Apple device) would be violating their rights to that mark.
IANAL too (although I Am K
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 9:45 PM, Chris Leonard wrote:
> IANAL, but the term "Retina" in reference to computers and mobile
How about "fovea display"?
;-)
m
--
martin.langh...@gmail.com
mar...@laptop.org -- Software Architect - OLPC
- ask interesting questions
- don't get distracted with sh
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 9:36 PM, Sridhar Dhanapalan
wrote:
> The phrase "retina display" is being used a lot these days. My reading
> indicates that the vendor uses this term quite loosely [1]. There you
> can see that the definition currently ranges from 326 to 220 ppi.
>
> The resolution of the
The phrase "retina display" is being used a lot these days. My reading
indicates that the vendor uses this term quite loosely [1]. There you
can see that the definition currently ranges from 326 to 220 ppi.
The resolution of the XO's display is listed as 200 dpi [2], which is
not far off. If I hav
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 7:51 PM, Jerry Vonau wrote:
>> I would like to propose a feature for discussion and inclusion in the
>> 0.98 cycle is packaging all control-panel applets as rpms. As this
>> discussion does not impact the UI and more o
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 7:51 PM, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> I would like to propose a feature for discussion and inclusion in the
> 0.98 cycle is packaging all control-panel applets as rpms. As this
> discussion does not impact the UI and more of a packaging issue I'm an
> not creating a Features page.
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> That is kind of interesting as I'm on liv...@lists.fedoraproject.org. I
> have not had any email from that list since July 9 nor have the
> archives[1]. Where did that email end up going?
Yeah, I'm subscribed there with nomail, and the listse
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 5:15 AM, John Watlington wrote:
>
> On Jul 26, 2012, at 11:09 PM, Sameer Verma wrote:
>
> > www.engadget.com/2012/07/26/olpc-xo-touch-1-75-to-use-neonode-tech/
> >
> > The post says "as yet unreleased XO 1.75". What's the official status
> > on the 1.75? Still as yet unrel
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 6:56 AM, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> Just looking at the current 0.96-3 src.rpm for sugar and wondering if
> sugar-gnomekeyring.patch should be somewhere else other than in the
> sugar package. This is a one time configuration that the olpc-utils[1]
> package currently
11 matches
Mail list logo