Thats not so bad (relatively).
Thanks for the info Jerry!
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 11:13 PM, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 22:12 -0400, Martin Abente wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 9:55 PM, Martin Langhoff
> > wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Martin A
On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 22:12 -0400, Martin Abente wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 9:55 PM, Martin Langhoff
> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Martin Abente
> wrote:
> > Have anyone actually tried to emulate?
>
>
> Not that I know. B
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 9:55 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Martin Abente
> wrote:
> > Have anyone actually tried to emulate?
>
> Not that I know. But I would expect it to be ~10x slower than on an
> XO-1.75. And better hw should be available in the coming months,
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Martin Abente
wrote:
> Have anyone actually tried to emulate?
Not that I know. But I would expect it to be ~10x slower than on an
XO-1.75. And better hw should be available in the coming months, and
affordable (<$200).
m
--
mar...@laptop.org -- Software Archi
Hi Martin:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 9:30 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 8:51 PM, John Gilmore wrote:
> > Instead, you should fix OOB so it works to cross-compile.
>
> Unfortunately, OOB is just a nice wrapper around anaconda and rpm. You
> cannot cross-build because
>
> -
martin wrote:
>
> TBH, I have never seen any OS image builder / composer in the Linux
> world that works cross platform.
which isn't to say that we don't make extensive use of cross-compiling
in development. i think all of our dev kernels are cross-compiled,
and probably most of us use cross-
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 8:51 PM, John Gilmore wrote:
> Instead, you should fix OOB so it works to cross-compile.
Unfortunately, OOB is just a nice wrapper around anaconda and rpm. You
cannot cross-build because
- The anaconda toolchain does not have a good separation of
environment arch vs targ
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Jose Prous wrote:
> > Yes it's a x86 machine, I guess that is the problem. Thanks.
>
> Glad that we found the reason. We should add an explicit check in OOB
> that gives you a more useful error msg.
Instead, you should fix OOB so it works to cross-compile. We
>> If your XO images have the GNOME desktop in them, using
>> the web browser included for GNOME (Firefox or Epiphany)
>> to download the file to USB should not alter the file name.
>> Just make sure the kids know how to "eject" the USB stick
>> when they are done.
> This is probably what I'm goin
I agree that this is not the best behavior, especially if Browse can
potentially determine the original extension while downloading.
If your XO images have the GNOME desktop in them, using the web
browser included for GNOME (Firefox or Epiphany) to download the file
to USB should not alter
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Jose Prous wrote:
> Yes it's a x86 machine, I guess that is the problem. Thanks.
Glad that we found the reason. We should add an explicit check in OOB
that gives you a more useful error msg.
Compared with x86 builders, an XO-1.75 is fairly slow, and getting
fast
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Samuel Greenfeld wrote:
>> 1. Is there a security problem/concern with having our project's lease.sig
>> file publicly available? (we only generate activations for non-stolen XOs)
Should be ok, as long as you're comfortable with the validity period
(ie: not too lo
Yes it's a x86 machine, I guess that is the problem. Thanks.
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Martin Langhoff
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Jose Prous wrote:
> > Hello, I'm José Prous from Paraguay Educa.
> >
> > I'm trying compile an OLPC build for the XO 1.75.
> >
> > I followed th
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Jose Prous wrote:
> Hello, I'm José Prous from Paraguay Educa.
>
> I'm trying compile an OLPC build for the XO 1.75.
>
> I followed the instructions in http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OS_Builder
What is your build host machine? Is it an XO-1.75, or otherwise an ARM comp
Hello, I'm José Prous from Paraguay Educa.
I'm trying compile an OLPC build for the XO 1.75.
I followed the instructions in http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OS_Builder
I used os-builder from the git source in the commit
252aa2a3c2859e2677e05675f7eaff2b5b430e54 and using the config file
olpc-os-12.1.0-x
15 matches
Mail list logo
