Re: Re (2): XO-1.5 build 885 no space in journal

2013-06-11 Thread John Watlington
On Jun 11, 2013, at 11:17 PM, peasth...@shaw.ca wrote: > From: James Cameron > Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 11:54:36 +1000 >> Yes, another option is to buy 4 GB or 8 GB microSD cards and open each >> laptop to install them. But there's a small risk of them not working >> with the firmware ... we made

Re (2): XO-1.5 build 885 no space in journal

2013-06-11 Thread peasthope
From: James Cameron Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 11:54:36 +1000 > Yes, another option is to buy 4 GB or 8 GB microSD cards and open each > laptop to install them. But there's a small risk of them not working > with the firmware ... we made sure the ones we used in manufacturing > did work. Some ve

Re: XO-1.5 build 885 no space in journal

2013-06-11 Thread James Cameron
You can tell the size of each activity roughly like this, in Terminal, cd Activities du -s * | sort -n This gives a list by activity, measured in 1k blocks. The sizes of the activities in 13.2.0 ends with: 2836Chat.activity 2888Welcome.activity 3032Memorize.activity

RE: XO-1.5 build 885 no space in journal

2013-06-11 Thread David Leeming
Thanks James. Seems that we got the 2GB version. How can I tell the size of each Activity? Maybe another option is to buy SDRAM cards for them and re-flash with the latest? We need those activities such as Wikipedia. Would you recommend 13.1.0 ? David -Original Message- From: qu...@u

Re: XO-1.5 build 885 no space in journal

2013-06-11 Thread James Cameron
G'day David, Build 885 is OLPC OS 11.3.1. This release predated automatic sizing. Check which build file was used for installing. If the os885.zd2 (2 GB) file was used, then the symptom you report is likely. Check the size of the microSD cards inside the XO-1.5. You can get this information f

XO-1.5 build 885 no space in journal

2013-06-11 Thread David Leeming
Hello We have a 200 XO deployment in Solomon Islands sponsored by a bank. I am helping out. Although we were expecting 1.75s, they have been shipped XO 1.5 with Build 885, Sugar 0.94.1 and firmware Q3C07 Out of the box there is very little space in the Journal and it only takes a few days

13.2.0 release candidate 3 (build 9) released

2013-06-11 Thread Daniel Drake
Sorry - I sent this out yesterday but with the wrong subject line. On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Daniel Drake wrote: > Hi, > > We're pleased to announce the next release candidate of our new 13.2.0 > software release. > > Information and installation instructions can be found here: > http://wi

Re: MMP interrupt controller DT layout

2013-06-11 Thread Mitch Bradley
On 6/11/2013 4:21 AM, Daniel Drake wrote: > Hi, > > I am looking at upstreaming these patches: > > http://dev.laptop.org/~dsd/20130611/0003-ARM-mmp-Fix-MMP2-interrupt-controller-DT-nodes.patch > > http://dev.laptop.org/~dsd/20130611/0004-ARM-mmp-irq-Use-of_g

MMP interrupt controller DT layout

2013-06-11 Thread Daniel Drake
Hi, I am looking at upstreaming these patches: http://dev.laptop.org/~dsd/20130611/0003-ARM-mmp-Fix-MMP2-interrupt-controller-DT-nodes.patch http://dev.laptop.org/~dsd/20130611/0004-ARM-mmp-irq-Use-of_get_address-instead-of-of_address.patch Could one of you summarise the background here, and

Re: Compiling thee kernel

2013-06-11 Thread Ajay Garg
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 6:38 PM, Paul Fox wrote: > ajay wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Paul Fox wrote: > > > > > ajay wrote: > > > > Hi James. > > > > Thanks a ton for the reply > > > > > > > > Here are the steps I followed on my x86-based Dell laptop:: > > > > >

Re: Compiling thee kernel

2013-06-11 Thread Paul Fox
ajay wrote: > On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Paul Fox wrote: > > > ajay wrote: > > > Hi James. > > > Thanks a ton for the reply > > > > > > Here are the steps I followed on my x86-based Dell laptop:: > > > > > > a) > > > "cd ~" > > > > > > > > > b) > > > "git clone

Re: Compiling thee kernel

2013-06-11 Thread Ajay Garg
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Paul Fox wrote: > ajay wrote: > > Hi James. > > Thanks a ton for the reply > > > > Here are the steps I followed on my x86-based Dell laptop:: > > > > a) > > "cd ~" > > > > > > b) > > "git clone git://dev.laptop.org/olpc-kernel" > > > > > > c) >

Re: Compiling thee kernel

2013-06-11 Thread Paul Fox
ajay wrote: > Hi James. > Thanks a ton for the reply > > Here are the steps I followed on my x86-based Dell laptop:: > > a) > "cd ~" > > > b) > "git clone git://dev.laptop.org/olpc-kernel" > > > c) > "cd olpc-kernel" > you left out: cp arch/x86/configs/xo_1.5_defcon

Re: Compiling thee kernel

2013-06-11 Thread Ajay Garg
Hi James. Thanks a ton for the reply Here are the steps I followed on my x86-based Dell laptop:: a) "cd ~" b) "git clone git://dev.laptop.org/olpc-kernel" c) "cd olpc-kernel" d) "make" e) Wait many minutes (if not hours). Everything runs to completion. f) Haphazardly edit "drivers/

Re: Compiling thee kernel

2013-06-11 Thread James Cameron
G'day Ajay, I've never heard of such a restriction. Can you tell us the name of the branch you compiled, and what method you used? Perhaps share the output? -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org htt

Compiling thee kernel

2013-06-11 Thread Ajay Garg
Hi all. I cloned the kernel source-code from git://dev.laptop.org/olpc-kernel, and ran "make" from my Dell x86-based laptop. The compilation ran to completion successfully. However, I noticed that "marvell" module (in drivers/media/video) was not compiled. As a very vague guess, the reason seems