Re: FW: WiFi Problem
I have checked our database carefully. Sorry, but developer key for this laptop must come from Plan Ceibal in Uruguay. You cannot use diagnosis tools without that. -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] XO on Fedora 20 (was Re: [GSoC] Porting To Python3)
By the way, I suspect the issue with small icons is something we already fixed in 0.101. As soon as we have the base system working decently I'm planning to make builds with latest sugar from git. On 10 May 2014 01:22, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > I built a xo4 image, which like 1.75 boots fine into sugar > > http://sugarlabs.org/~dnarvaez/oob/images/xo4/ > > The main problem, as discussed, is that firmwares are not loaded. I'm > building a systemd rpm with firmware loading enabled. If we can get wifi > working then it should be easier to play with stuff, building in the > virtual machine takes really too long. > > > On 9 May 2014 14:13, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > >> I built an image for 1.75 >> >> http://sugarlabs.org/~dnarvaez/oob/images/ >> >> I've not been able to test yet. I don't have my usual usb stick with me >> and having troubles finding something the XO likes. >> >> >> On 8 May 2014 02:04, Daniel Narvaez wrote: >> >>> As an update, I have patched xorg-x11-drv-dove and built rpms for it >>> >>> http://shell.sugarlabs.org/~dnarvaez/oob/f20-xo1.75/ >>> >>> Now building an image with those. >>> >>> >>> On 7 May 2014 15:18, Martin Abente wrote: >>> Great! I will try your oob branch for 1.5, I do have XOs 1.5 for testing :) On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > On 7 May 2014 01:44, James Cameron wrote: > >> On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 04:24:39PM +0200, Daniel Narvaez wrote: >> > [...] And with the XO stuck on Fedora 18 we might not have good >> > enough introspection to make the port compatible with it. >> >> If anybody would like to work on moving olpc-os-builder to something >> more recent, feel free. It isn't something OLPC is looking at right >> now, but it would be helpful to the users. >> >> Not the die hard 0.98 users, of course. ;-) > > > I'm giving that a try. I was able to build a Fedora 20 image for XO 1.5 > > https://github.com/dnarvaez/olpc-os-builder > > I don't have hardware to test that though... I'm now trying to build > for 1.75 which is harder but I can actually test. I need to rebuild the X > driver but I think that will require some patching, let's see if I can get > it to work... > > ___ > Devel mailing list > Devel@lists.laptop.org > http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel > > ___ Sugar-devel mailing list sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Daniel Narvaez >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Daniel Narvaez >> > > > > -- > Daniel Narvaez > -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] XO on Fedora 20 (was Re: [GSoC] Porting To Python3)
I built a xo4 image, which like 1.75 boots fine into sugar http://sugarlabs.org/~dnarvaez/oob/images/xo4/ The main problem, as discussed, is that firmwares are not loaded. I'm building a systemd rpm with firmware loading enabled. If we can get wifi working then it should be easier to play with stuff, building in the virtual machine takes really too long. On 9 May 2014 14:13, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > I built an image for 1.75 > > http://sugarlabs.org/~dnarvaez/oob/images/ > > I've not been able to test yet. I don't have my usual usb stick with me > and having troubles finding something the XO likes. > > > On 8 May 2014 02:04, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > >> As an update, I have patched xorg-x11-drv-dove and built rpms for it >> >> http://shell.sugarlabs.org/~dnarvaez/oob/f20-xo1.75/ >> >> Now building an image with those. >> >> >> On 7 May 2014 15:18, Martin Abente wrote: >> >>> Great! >>> >>> I will try your oob branch for 1.5, I do have XOs 1.5 for testing :) >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote: >>> On 7 May 2014 01:44, James Cameron wrote: > On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 04:24:39PM +0200, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > > [...] And with the XO stuck on Fedora 18 we might not have good > > enough introspection to make the port compatible with it. > > If anybody would like to work on moving olpc-os-builder to something > more recent, feel free. It isn't something OLPC is looking at right > now, but it would be helpful to the users. > > Not the die hard 0.98 users, of course. ;-) I'm giving that a try. I was able to build a Fedora 20 image for XO 1.5 https://github.com/dnarvaez/olpc-os-builder I don't have hardware to test that though... I'm now trying to build for 1.75 which is harder but I can actually test. I need to rebuild the X driver but I think that will require some patching, let's see if I can get it to work... ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel >>> >>> ___ >>> Sugar-devel mailing list >>> sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org >>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Daniel Narvaez >> > > > > -- > Daniel Narvaez > -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: WiFi Problem
When doing this step: > > Release the '✓' (check) game pad key, and within ten seconds a Devel > > key Signature valid message will appear, with an open padlock icon, > > followed by Type the ESC key to interrupt automatic startup, Did you see a "Devel key Signature valid" message ? If you didn't, one possibility is that the UUID in our database doesn't match the one actually in the laptop. This is corrected by getting the correct information using a new collection USB key. John On May 9, 2014, at 12:40 PM, Juan Carlos Garcès Mariño wrote: > > > Juan Carlos Garcés > Ing. Electrónico > Cel. 311 819 0835 > Bogotá - Colombia > > > From: juancarlosgarc...@hotmail.com > To: qu...@laptop.org > Subject: RE: WiFi Problem > Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 11:40:08 -0500 > > I followed the instructions but.. > > I don´t know if it works, I do this proccess but I can´t enter in the OK > terminal for unlocked the security > > What I doing bad? > > > Juan Carlos Garcés > Ing. Electrónico > Cel. 311 819 0835 > Bogotá - Colombia > > > > Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 08:52:56 +1000 > > From: qu...@laptop.org > > To: juancarlosgarc...@hotmail.com > > CC: w...@laptop.org; devel@lists.laptop.org > > Subject: Re: WiFi Problem > > > > On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 05:43:24PM -0500, Juan Carlos Garcès Mariño wrote: > > > I can´t use the develop.sig file in this machines, don´t work. > > > I copy the file in a folder with name: /security but not happen > > > nothing. > > > > Nothing should happen. You have to do an extra step to take full > > command: > > > > Shutdown the laptop, > > > > Insert the USB drive or SD card containing the developer key, or with > > the key on the internal storage, > > > > Hold down the '✓' (check) game pad key and turn on the laptop, a > > diagram of the game keys should appear with a message Release the game > > keys to continue, > > > > Release the '✓' (check) game pad key, and within ten seconds a Devel > > key Signature valid message will appear, with an open padlock icon, > > followed by Type the ESC key to interrupt automatic startup, > > > > Press Escape key once, and the 'ok' prompt should appear immediately. > > > > The laptop is now unlocked temporarily. > > > > If this doesn't work, try a different medium. e.g. USB drive: > > > > Make a directory called security at the top of your USB drive and copy > > the develop.sig file into it. > > > > You should now have a USB drive a directory security which contains > > develop.sig, in. This is an unlock stick ready to use. > > > > > And in the console, appear me the follow: "/usr/bin/ping has both > > > setuid-root and effective capabilities. therefore not raising all > > > capabilities" > > > > > > I don´t know if have something that see with the problem > > > > It has nothing at all to do with the problem. > > > > -- > > James Cameron > > http://quozl.linux.org.au/ > ___ > Devel mailing list > Devel@lists.laptop.org > http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
FW: WiFi Problem
Juan Carlos Garcés Ing. ElectrónicoCel. 311 819 0835Bogotá - Colombia From: juancarlosgarc...@hotmail.com To: qu...@laptop.org Subject: RE: WiFi Problem Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 11:40:08 -0500 I followed the instructions but.. I don´t know if it works, I do this proccess but I can´t enter in the OK terminal for unlocked the security What I doing bad? Juan Carlos Garcés Ing. ElectrónicoCel. 311 819 0835Bogotá - Colombia > Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 08:52:56 +1000 > From: qu...@laptop.org > To: juancarlosgarc...@hotmail.com > CC: w...@laptop.org; devel@lists.laptop.org > Subject: Re: WiFi Problem > > On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 05:43:24PM -0500, Juan Carlos Garcès Mariño wrote: > > I can´t use the develop.sig file in this machines, don´t work. > > I copy the file in a folder with name: /security but not happen > > nothing. > > Nothing should happen. You have to do an extra step to take full > command: > > Shutdown the laptop, > > Insert the USB drive or SD card containing the developer key, or with > the key on the internal storage, > > Hold down the '✓' (check) game pad key and turn on the laptop, a > diagram of the game keys should appear with a message Release the game > keys to continue, > > Release the '✓' (check) game pad key, and within ten seconds a Devel > key Signature valid message will appear, with an open padlock icon, > followed by Type the ESC key to interrupt automatic startup, > > Press Escape key once, and the 'ok' prompt should appear immediately. > > The laptop is now unlocked temporarily. > > If this doesn't work, try a different medium. e.g. USB drive: > > Make a directory called security at the top of your USB drive and copy > the develop.sig file into it. > > You should now have a USB drive a directory security which contains > develop.sig, in. This is an unlock stick ready to use. > > > And in the console, appear me the follow: "/usr/bin/ping has both > > setuid-root and effective capabilities. therefore not raising all > > capabilities" > > > > I don´t know if have something that see with the problem > > It has nothing at all to do with the problem. > > -- > James Cameron > http://quozl.linux.org.au/ ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] XO on Fedora 20 (was Re: [GSoC] Porting To Python3)
On 9 May 2014 15:50, Peter Robinson wrote: > >>> On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 04:24:39PM +0200, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > >>> > [...] And with the XO stuck on Fedora 18 we might not have good > >>> > enough introspection to make the port compatible with it. > >>> > >>> If anybody would like to work on moving olpc-os-builder to something > >>> more recent, feel free. It isn't something OLPC is looking at right > >>> now, but it would be helpful to the users. > >>> > >>> Not the die hard 0.98 users, of course. ;-) > >> > >> > >> I'm giving that a try. I was able to build a Fedora 20 image for XO 1.5 > >> > >> https://github.com/dnarvaez/olpc-os-builder > > > > olpc-os-builder git master also has F20 support, as of a few months > > ago. Can't remember how good the result was. > > I suspect wifi and anything that needed firmware will fail to work > because of changes in the firmware loading interface needs newer > kernels (3.4 is too old for example) > Is this the change you are referring to https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/arm/2013-June/006116.html Rebuilding systemd wouldn't be too bad if it solves it... Support of the XOs in Fedora upstream is something I've been asked > about a number of times of late by varying different people. That would be awesome of course. ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] XO on Fedora 20 (was Re: [GSoC] Porting To Python3)
>>> On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 04:24:39PM +0200, Daniel Narvaez wrote: >>> > [...] And with the XO stuck on Fedora 18 we might not have good >>> > enough introspection to make the port compatible with it. >>> >>> If anybody would like to work on moving olpc-os-builder to something >>> more recent, feel free. It isn't something OLPC is looking at right >>> now, but it would be helpful to the users. >>> >>> Not the die hard 0.98 users, of course. ;-) >> >> >> I'm giving that a try. I was able to build a Fedora 20 image for XO 1.5 >> >> https://github.com/dnarvaez/olpc-os-builder > > olpc-os-builder git master also has F20 support, as of a few months > ago. Can't remember how good the result was. I suspect wifi and anything that needed firmware will fail to work because of changes in the firmware loading interface needs newer kernels (3.4 is too old for example) Support of the XOs in Fedora upstream is something I've been asked about a number of times of late by varying different people. Peter ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] XO on Fedora 20 (was Re: [GSoC] Porting To Python3)
On 9 May 2014 14:24, Daniel Drake wrote: > On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 9:01 PM, Daniel Narvaez > wrote: > > On 7 May 2014 01:44, James Cameron wrote: > >> > >> On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 04:24:39PM +0200, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > >> > [...] And with the XO stuck on Fedora 18 we might not have good > >> > enough introspection to make the port compatible with it. > >> > >> If anybody would like to work on moving olpc-os-builder to something > >> more recent, feel free. It isn't something OLPC is looking at right > >> now, but it would be helpful to the users. > >> > >> Not the die hard 0.98 users, of course. ;-) > > > > > > I'm giving that a try. I was able to build a Fedora 20 image for XO 1.5 > > > > https://github.com/dnarvaez/olpc-os-builder > > olpc-os-builder git master also has F20 support, as of a few months > ago. Can't remember how good the result was. > Does the 3.10 kernel which is used there have olpc patches applied? ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: XO on Fedora 20 (was Re: [Sugar-devel] [GSoC] Porting To Python3)
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 9:01 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > On 7 May 2014 01:44, James Cameron wrote: >> >> On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 04:24:39PM +0200, Daniel Narvaez wrote: >> > [...] And with the XO stuck on Fedora 18 we might not have good >> > enough introspection to make the port compatible with it. >> >> If anybody would like to work on moving olpc-os-builder to something >> more recent, feel free. It isn't something OLPC is looking at right >> now, but it would be helpful to the users. >> >> Not the die hard 0.98 users, of course. ;-) > > > I'm giving that a try. I was able to build a Fedora 20 image for XO 1.5 > > https://github.com/dnarvaez/olpc-os-builder olpc-os-builder git master also has F20 support, as of a few months ago. Can't remember how good the result was. Daniel ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] XO on Fedora 20 (was Re: [GSoC] Porting To Python3)
I built an image for 1.75 http://sugarlabs.org/~dnarvaez/oob/images/ I've not been able to test yet. I don't have my usual usb stick with me and having troubles finding something the XO likes. On 8 May 2014 02:04, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > As an update, I have patched xorg-x11-drv-dove and built rpms for it > > http://shell.sugarlabs.org/~dnarvaez/oob/f20-xo1.75/ > > Now building an image with those. > > > On 7 May 2014 15:18, Martin Abente wrote: > >> Great! >> >> I will try your oob branch for 1.5, I do have XOs 1.5 for testing :) >> >> >> >> On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote: >> >>> On 7 May 2014 01:44, James Cameron wrote: >>> On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 04:24:39PM +0200, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > [...] And with the XO stuck on Fedora 18 we might not have good > enough introspection to make the port compatible with it. If anybody would like to work on moving olpc-os-builder to something more recent, feel free. It isn't something OLPC is looking at right now, but it would be helpful to the users. Not the die hard 0.98 users, of course. ;-) >>> >>> >>> I'm giving that a try. I was able to build a Fedora 20 image for XO 1.5 >>> >>> https://github.com/dnarvaez/olpc-os-builder >>> >>> I don't have hardware to test that though... I'm now trying to build for >>> 1.75 which is harder but I can actually test. I need to rebuild the X >>> driver but I think that will require some patching, let's see if I can get >>> it to work... >>> >>> ___ >>> Devel mailing list >>> Devel@lists.laptop.org >>> http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel >>> >>> >> >> ___ >> Sugar-devel mailing list >> sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org >> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel >> >> > > > -- > Daniel Narvaez > -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
