Re: [Sugar-devel] XO-1 vs Sugar 0.104 performance, and swap to NAND Flash

2015-04-07 Thread James Cameron
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 11:32:00PM -0500, Sebastian Silva wrote: > > On 07/04/15 22:47, James Cameron wrote: > > The testing scripts can be made available if anybody else would > > like to replicate the results. > > I'd be curious to look at your scripts and try to replicate some > results with o

Re: [Sugar-devel] XO-1 vs Sugar 0.104 performance, and swap to NAND Flash

2015-04-07 Thread Sebastian Silva
On 07/04/15 22:47, James Cameron wrote: > The testing scripts can be made available if anybody else would like > to replicate the results. I'd be curious to look at your scripts and try to replicate some results with our builds. Thanks a lot for your detailed tests! Sebastian __

RE: [support-gang] XO-1 vs Sugar 0.104 performance, and swap to NAND Flash

2015-04-07 Thread Tim Moody
Thanks for wrapping your arms around this. And congratulations to those who made the curve head in the right direction. -Original Message- From: support-gang [mailto:support-gang-boun...@lists.laptop.org] On Behalf Of James Cameron Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2015 11:47 PM To: support-g...@

Re: XO-1 vs Sugar 0.104 performance, and swap to NAND Flash

2015-04-07 Thread James Cameron
Browse is one of the most heavily used activities when internet or local content is available. Tests were run over many hours on several XO-1 laptops. The XO-1 is an old design which is slow enough to give useful statistics. The results show a continued improvement to startup time over the recen