I just saw Walter's reply, and things in Uruguay do indeed seem to work
well. Those sorts of processes are what's needed in large deployments.
On Aug 8, 2010, at 5:09 PM, Christoph Derndorfer wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Ed McNierney wrote:
> Instructions
> So if you please go back to the original mail and answer any question you
> think you can so tickets can be filed.
No, no reflexes - the only other question in that email I can answer
immediately is, no, there is planned printing support in 10.1.2 or later. I
have not heard of anyone interes
here at all, we won't know there's a
problem to fix.
- Ed
On Aug 8, 2010, at 6:00 PM, Brenda Wallace wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Walter Bender wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Christoph Derndorfer
>> wrote:
>>> On Sun, Aug 8, 201
"Every member of the OLPC technical staff is on the de...@laptop.org mailing
list, and we all see bugs filed in trac."
Sorry - that's not correct. I forgot that Mitch Bradley unsubscribed from
de...@laptop.org last December, as he found "the noise level has gotten out of
control". He does, ho
On Aug 19, 2010, at 4:21 PM, John Watlington wrote:
>> Thanks for the update. Can you disclose the brands of the mentioned SD cards?
>> It's always useful to know what not to buy.
>
> I probably could, but variations between models from one manufacturer
> may be greater than variations between ma
>
> Directly from the OEM or on the open market?
>
Both.
- Ed
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
ent then. Counterfeiting may be your
> problem.
>
> Best regards,
> Tiago
>
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 2:03 AM, Ed McNierney wrote:
>
> >
> > Directly from the OEM or on the open market?
> >
>
> Both.
>
>- Ed
>
>
___
Folks -
Thanks for getting the discussion rolling. Although it may be obvious, I want
to point out one aspect of OLPC's "mesh" needs that has complicated matters.
Our XO laptops are used at home, in a sparse network environment, and at
school, in a dense network environment, and all levels of
Mikus -
Well, there's a reason Linus called them BogoMips, isn't there?
- Ed
On Nov 10, 2010, at 5:39 PM, Mikus Grinbergs wrote:
> I notice in the dmesg printout that the BogoMips for this initial
> XO-1.75 version is less than for the G1G1 XO-1.
>
> mikus
>
>
> Two questions:
>
> 1.
> Here (under Tech Specs)
> http://bit.ly/bdr0Cz
> it specs the 10" tablet with an ARMADA 168. Why did not you go with that
> processor? Would not that be cheaper?
That's a Marvell product platform page, not OLPC's.
>
> 2.
> What happened to the bigger display and the
On Nov 11, 2010, at 7:32 AM, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
> On 11.11.2010, at 12:49, Ed McNierney wrote:
>
>> [...] we're talking about XO-1.75 right now, which is a laptop. An OLPC-3
>> tablet is a long way away and it's not really useful to discuss/speculate on
&
Marvell's Armada SoC family is complicated. There are multiple product lines,
and multiple products in each product line, with new ones coming along all the
time. So it's hard to nail down just which device is the "latest and greatest"
at any time.
OLPC is (unsurprisingly) doing something a l
Naz -
Thanks for the thoughts!
> IMHO it's better to delay the release of the 1.75 and force putting in
> a touchscreen.
It's not a matter of time, it's a matter of the price deployments are willing
to pay for it. The feedback we've heard so far is that since the XO-1.75
without a touchscreen
Sridhar -
Yes, there's no problem as long as you're not suggesting using a different make
or model of card (i.e. swapping only cards originally shipped with XO machines,
not new ones). You can also do that, too, but many microSD cards fail our
qualification testing and may fail much more quick
From the XO-1.5 hardware spec at
http://wiki.laptop.org/images/f/f0/CL1B_Hdwe_Design_Spec.pdf
"2.7.4 External Microphone Input
A stereo jack is provided on the laptop for connecting an external microphone,
switch, or other sensor. This jack is connected to the audio codec’s microphone
input,
Just make sure you keep in mind the difference between the specification and
what is likely to be acceptable. One value is better suited to personal
tinkering, the other to widespread propagation.
- Ed (who was disappointed to learn this weekend that "Zener" is not in
the official Scra
We recently turned on that feature in trac due to increasing amounts of ticket
spam from unverified addresses.
- Ed
On Feb 2, 2011, at 7:58 PM, Mikus Grinbergs wrote:
> Received an email from bugtrac...@laptop.org, asking me to verify my new
> email address. Since I have been using th
Sridhar -
Yes, that's correct. Multiple valid keys weakens security, since the same
rights can be obtained from multiple sources.
Handling your own key-issuing authority is something we fully support, but it
is a complex and substantial undertaking. It requires a reasonable commitment
to bot
John -
While I am not familiar with the Mesh Potato, I have spent some time trying to
figure out whether wireless mesh networking is really as hard as the OLPC
universe seems to find that it is.
I have come to believe that both wired and wireless mesh networks are really
doing pretty well out
was in, and
> adapt its parameters to it), but no progress has been made, and its
> impact may be very small now, even if it is ever out of the drawing
> board.
>
> I agree that successful mesh networks are mostly static, but we
> thought that the very mobility of the network (whic
Daniel -
Thanks to everyone who worked hard to make this happen. It's a great
improvement and a fine job!
- Ed
On Jul 22, 2011, at 4:32 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We're pleased to announce the release of OLPC OS 11.2.0 for XO-1 and
> XO-1.5. Details of new features, known iss
raw NAND chips.
- Ed
Ed McNierney
CTO
One Laptop per Child
e...@laptop.org
+1 (978) 761-0049
On Aug 16, 2011, at 12:33 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn
> wrote:
>>
>> I always wondered why not put an SD of 2 instead
No, "whew, I think".
- Ed
On Aug 25, 2011, at 8:41 AM, Paul Fox wrote:
> chris wrote:
>> http://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/456217/25261a3982aee26d/
>>
>> Sympathetic coverage, I think. :-)
>
> whew. :-)
>
> =-
> paul fox, p...@laptop.org
> ___
Tony -
Due to our battery-management system, it is impossible to charge an XO laptop
in less than about 110 minutes. With a few breaks, I have personally fully
charged an XO-1 laptop with a Freeplay hand crank charger in 110 minutes, and I
am by no means "an adult athlete", especially when it
Richard (et al.) -
Please keep in mind that early ramp units of XO-1.5 were sent to Australia, and
they are different (specifically with respect to the heat spreader) than all
the production units that follow.
- Ed
On Jan 23, 2012, at 7:54 AM, Richard A. Smith wrote:
> On 01/23/2012
Sridhar -
I agree with Richard's concern about finding the problem. Have you tried to
differentiate between problems with collaboration and problems with networking
in general? Have you tried different 3G modems and seen different results?
I'm just a little skeptical about assuming we know w
Windows XP on the XO-1 loads and works just about the same as on any other
machine. Microsoft did the implementation, primarily by replacing Open
Firmware with Insyde BIOS, a standard proprietary x86 PC BIOS. There’s nothing
you’d learn from it that you wouldn’t learn from studying XP booting
Microsoft Windows XP was released for the XO-1 and XO-1.5 laptops. Both were
special projects done for a limited number of users, and were never maintained
beyond the initial release. Neither version is or was generally available.
- Ed
> On Apr 25, 2015, at 9:41 PM, Jhon Diaz wrote:
Yes, and due to Microsoft’s requirements it could only boot from a very
specific make and model (and perhaps even production batch) of SD card. AFAIK,
the XO is still the only computer that could (legitimately) boot Windows XP
from removable media. Please don’t spend any time on this - it’s ju
101 - 129 of 129 matches
Mail list logo