Re: Making OLPC / Sugar Labs more approachable (was: Re: OLPC 10.1.2 Release Candidate 1)

2010-08-08 Thread Ed McNierney
I just saw Walter's reply, and things in Uruguay do indeed seem to work well. Those sorts of processes are what's needed in large deployments. On Aug 8, 2010, at 5:09 PM, Christoph Derndorfer wrote: > On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Ed McNierney wrote: > Instructions

Re: OLPC 10.1.2 Release Candidate 1

2010-08-08 Thread Ed McNierney
> So if you please go back to the original mail and answer any question you > think you can so tickets can be filed. No, no reflexes - the only other question in that email I can answer immediately is, no, there is planned printing support in 10.1.2 or later. I have not heard of anyone interes

Re: [Sugar-devel] Making OLPC / Sugar Labs more approachable (was: Re: OLPC 10.1.2 Release Candidate 1)

2010-08-08 Thread Ed McNierney
here at all, we won't know there's a problem to fix. - Ed On Aug 8, 2010, at 6:00 PM, Brenda Wallace wrote: > On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Walter Bender wrote: >> On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Christoph Derndorfer >> wrote: >>> On Sun, Aug 8, 201

Re: Making OLPC / Sugar Labs more approachable (was: Re: OLPC 10.1.2 Release Candidate 1)

2010-08-08 Thread Ed McNierney
"Every member of the OLPC technical staff is on the de...@laptop.org mailing list, and we all see bugs filed in trac." Sorry - that's not correct. I forgot that Mitch Bradley unsubscribed from de...@laptop.org last December, as he found "the noise level has gotten out of control". He does, ho

Re: SD/MMC cards, a year later

2010-08-19 Thread Ed McNierney
On Aug 19, 2010, at 4:21 PM, John Watlington wrote: >> Thanks for the update. Can you disclose the brands of the mentioned SD cards? >> It's always useful to know what not to buy. > > I probably could, but variations between models from one manufacturer > may be greater than variations between ma

Re: SD/MMC cards, a year later

2010-08-19 Thread Ed McNierney
> > Directly from the OEM or on the open market? > Both. - Ed ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel

Re: SD/MMC cards, a year later

2010-08-20 Thread Ed McNierney
ent then. Counterfeiting may be your > problem. > > Best regards, > Tiago > > On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 2:03 AM, Ed McNierney wrote: > > > > > Directly from the OEM or on the open market? > > > > Both. > >- Ed > > ___

Re: "Mesh" Dreams = OLSR

2010-08-25 Thread Ed McNierney
Folks - Thanks for getting the discussion rolling. Although it may be obvious, I want to point out one aspect of OLPC's "mesh" needs that has complicated matters. Our XO laptops are used at home, in a sparse network environment, and at school, in a dense network environment, and all levels of

Re: XO-1.75 progress

2010-11-10 Thread Ed McNierney
Mikus - Well, there's a reason Linus called them BogoMips, isn't there? - Ed On Nov 10, 2010, at 5:39 PM, Mikus Grinbergs wrote: > I notice in the dmesg printout that the BogoMips for this initial > XO-1.75 version is less than for the G1G1 XO-1. > > mikus > >

Re: XO-1.75 progress

2010-11-11 Thread Ed McNierney
> Two questions: > > 1. > Here (under Tech Specs) > http://bit.ly/bdr0Cz > it specs the 10" tablet with an ARMADA 168. Why did not you go with that > processor? Would not that be cheaper? That's a Marvell product platform page, not OLPC's. > > 2. > What happened to the bigger display and the

Re: XO-1.75 progress

2010-11-11 Thread Ed McNierney
On Nov 11, 2010, at 7:32 AM, Bert Freudenberg wrote: > On 11.11.2010, at 12:49, Ed McNierney wrote: > >> [...] we're talking about XO-1.75 right now, which is a laptop. An OLPC-3 >> tablet is a long way away and it's not really useful to discuss/speculate on &

Re: XO-1.75 progress

2010-11-11 Thread Ed McNierney
Marvell's Armada SoC family is complicated. There are multiple product lines, and multiple products in each product line, with new ones coming along all the time. So it's hard to nail down just which device is the "latest and greatest" at any time. OLPC is (unsurprisingly) doing something a l

Re: XO-1.75 progress

2010-11-11 Thread Ed McNierney
Naz - Thanks for the thoughts! > IMHO it's better to delay the release of the 1.75 and force putting in > a touchscreen. It's not a matter of time, it's a matter of the price deployments are willing to pay for it. The feedback we've heard so far is that since the XO-1.75 without a touchscreen

Re: Swapping microSD cards

2010-11-12 Thread Ed McNierney
Sridhar - Yes, there's no problem as long as you're not suggesting using a different make or model of card (i.e. swapping only cards originally shipped with XO machines, not new ones). You can also do that, too, but many microSD cards fail our qualification testing and may fail much more quick

Re: XO-1.75 microphone socket

2010-11-15 Thread Ed McNierney
From the XO-1.5 hardware spec at http://wiki.laptop.org/images/f/f0/CL1B_Hdwe_Design_Spec.pdf "2.7.4 External Microphone Input A stereo jack is provided on the laptop for connecting an external microphone, switch, or other sensor. This jack is connected to the audio codec’s microphone input,

Re: XO-1.75 microphone socket

2010-11-15 Thread Ed McNierney
Just make sure you keep in mind the difference between the specification and what is likely to be acceptable. One value is better suited to personal tinkering, the other to widespread propagation. - Ed (who was disappointed to learn this weekend that "Zener" is not in the official Scra

Re: Trac email verification

2011-02-02 Thread Ed McNierney
We recently turned on that feature in trac due to increasing amounts of ticket spam from unverified addresses. - Ed On Feb 2, 2011, at 7:58 PM, Mikus Grinbergs wrote: > Received an email from bugtrac...@laptop.org, asking me to verify my new > email address. Since I have been using th

Re: XO-1 developer key does not work

2011-03-14 Thread Ed McNierney
Sridhar - Yes, that's correct. Multiple valid keys weakens security, since the same rights can be obtained from multiple sources. Handling your own key-issuing authority is something we fully support, but it is a complex and substantial undertaking. It requires a reasonable commitment to bot

Re: Mesh Potatos and OLPCs?

2011-03-23 Thread Ed McNierney
John - While I am not familiar with the Mesh Potato, I have spent some time trying to figure out whether wireless mesh networking is really as hard as the OLPC universe seems to find that it is. I have come to believe that both wired and wireless mesh networks are really doing pretty well out

Re: Mesh Potatos and OLPCs?

2011-03-24 Thread Ed McNierney
was in, and > adapt its parameters to it), but no progress has been made, and its > impact may be very small now, even if it is ever out of the drawing > board. > > I agree that successful mesh networks are mostly static, but we > thought that the very mobility of the network (whic

Re: Announcing OLPC OS 11.2.0 for XO-1 and XO-1.5

2011-07-22 Thread Ed McNierney
Daniel - Thanks to everyone who worked hard to make this happen. It's a great improvement and a fine job! - Ed On Jul 22, 2011, at 4:32 PM, Daniel Drake wrote: > Hi, > > We're pleased to announce the release of OLPC OS 11.2.0 for XO-1 and > XO-1.5. Details of new features, known iss

Re: Sugar and GTK updates

2011-08-16 Thread Ed McNierney
raw NAND chips. - Ed Ed McNierney CTO One Laptop per Child e...@laptop.org +1 (978) 761-0049 On Aug 16, 2011, at 12:33 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn > wrote: >> >> I always wondered why not put an SD of 2 instead

Re: OLPC/pgf on LWN

2011-08-25 Thread Ed McNierney
No, "whew, I think". - Ed On Aug 25, 2011, at 8:41 AM, Paul Fox wrote: > chris wrote: >> http://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/456217/25261a3982aee26d/ >> >> Sympathetic coverage, I think. :-) > > whew. :-) > > =- > paul fox, p...@laptop.org > ___

Re: harvesting energy

2011-10-27 Thread Ed McNierney
Tony - Due to our battery-management system, it is impossible to charge an XO laptop in less than about 110 minutes. With a few breaks, I have personally fully charged an XO-1 laptop with a Freeplay hand crank charger in 110 minutes, and I am by no means "an adult athlete", especially when it

Re: Run OFW heat spreader test

2012-01-23 Thread Ed McNierney
Richard (et al.) - Please keep in mind that early ramp units of XO-1.5 were sent to Australia, and they are different (specifically with respect to the heat spreader) than all the production units that follow. - Ed On Jan 23, 2012, at 7:54 AM, Richard A. Smith wrote: > On 01/23/2012

Re: Impacts of disabling Automatic Power Management

2012-02-01 Thread Ed McNierney
Sridhar - I agree with Richard's concern about finding the problem. Have you tried to differentiate between problems with collaboration and problems with networking in general? Have you tried different 3G modems and seen different results? I'm just a little skeptical about assuming we know w

Windows XP on XO-1, XO-1.5

2015-01-27 Thread Ed McNierney
Windows XP on the XO-1 loads and works just about the same as on any other machine. Microsoft did the implementation, primarily by replacing Open Firmware with Insyde BIOS, a standard proprietary x86 PC BIOS. There’s nothing you’d learn from it that you wouldn’t learn from studying XP booting

Re: Windows xo-1

2015-04-26 Thread Ed McNierney
Microsoft Windows XP was released for the XO-1 and XO-1.5 laptops. Both were special projects done for a limited number of users, and were never maintained beyond the initial release. Neither version is or was generally available. - Ed > On Apr 25, 2015, at 9:41 PM, Jhon Diaz wrote:

Re: Windows

2015-04-27 Thread Ed McNierney
Yes, and due to Microsoft’s requirements it could only boot from a very specific make and model (and perhaps even production batch) of SD card. AFAIK, the XO is still the only computer that could (legitimately) boot Windows XP from removable media. Please don’t spend any time on this - it’s ju

<    1   2