On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 5:29 AM Carrol Riddle wrote:
>
> XO's attempting to run YUM update or install are unable to use fedora mirror
> sites (https://) but able to use primary fedora site (http://).
>
> Is this a matter of https vs http / ca-certificates or changes in mirror
> structures ? Ca-
qu...@lists.laptop.org
>>>>
>>>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>>> devel-ow...@lists.laptop.org
>>>>
>>>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>>>> than "Re: Content
rson managing the list at
>> devel-ow...@lists.laptop.org
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of Devel digest..."
>>
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>> 1. Porting
On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 4:28 AM, Samuel Greenfeld wrote:
> It has been a few years (Fedora 18) since the original XO Laptop series has
> had any sort of major Operating System update.
>
> In order to support newer versions of Systemd, features found in newer
> versions of the Linux kernel are requ
On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Adam Holt wrote:
> On Feb 7, 2016 3:22 AM, "Peter Robinson" wrote:
>> things like
>> the PINE64 above it has a SoC attached network but not storage.
>
> Both SATA (real TB+ disks) and Ethernet (external Wi-Fi AP antennae) are
&
> You are the expert here (on the low end especially, with $5 Raspberri Pi
> Zeros!) leading OLE refugee camp deployments across many countries. Whereas
> most OLPC-like schools I talk to want to spend $100 (or more) for a
> mini-server that's truly resilient for years in tropical environments,
>
>> > Given I looked into this before with F22 Beta(*), I ran OLPC OS Builder
>> > tonight, excluding nothing from all repositories, and let it loose.
>>
>> Funny! I was doing exactly the same yesterday for the 1.5!
>>
>> > There were a few more minor issues found with the build process. But I
>> >
BTW is the F-22 + 4.1rc5 kernel image somewhere to pull and test with?
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 12:01 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 9:05 AM, James Cameron wrote:
>> The v4.1-rc5 kernel boots fine on XO-1.5, though there are a few
>> things to be fixed; screen
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 9:05 AM, James Cameron wrote:
> The v4.1-rc5 kernel boots fine on XO-1.5, though there are a few
> things to be fixed; screen blanks on boot, camera LED stays on and
> camera doesn't work, temperature of CPU is not accessible, and suspend
> fails to complete. Some of these
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 4:17 AM, Samuel Greenfeld wrote:
> Given I looked into this before with F22 Beta(*), I ran OLPC OS Builder
> tonight, excluding nothing from all repositories, and let it loose.
Funny! I was doing exactly the same yesterday for the 1.5!
> There were a few more minor issues
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 12:04 AM, James Cameron wrote:
> On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 10:28:06AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 4:21 AM, Samuel Greenfeld
>> wrote:
>> > The obvious counterargument would be that a deployment might want
>> > to
> Ok. I didn't know that.
>
> When I talked with deployments and they ask for Ubuntu,
> and I ask why, what they really want is Long Time Support.
> No deployment change their image more than once a year.
> In fact, change a image is a logistic challenge for most of
> the big/middle size deployment
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 4:21 AM, Samuel Greenfeld wrote:
> The obvious counterargument would be that a deployment might want to deploy
> your XO-Next (whatever it is) alongside existing XO laptops, allowing all of
> them to have the same configuration.
From my memory of olpc-os-builder it was very
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 12:10 AM, James Cameron wrote:
> On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 09:19:45AM -0300, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
>> I think we should try make a build using CentOS. I don't know if
>> have all the packages we need, but the rate of change in Fedora was
>> difficult to follow when OLPC had a
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 8:50 PM, Adam Holt wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Gonzalo Odiard
> wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 1:10 AM, Samuel Greenfeld
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> At James' suggestion I looked a bit into a Fedora 22 beta build. I have
>>> found the following problems so far
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 5:10 AM, Samuel Greenfeld wrote:
> At James' suggestion I looked a bit into a Fedora 22 beta build. I have
> found the following problems so far getting the RPM dependencies worked out:
>
> olpc-library needs to depend on python-jinja2, not python-jinja. The
> olpc-librar
>> On 07/04/15 22:47, James Cameron wrote:
>> > The testing scripts can be made available if anybody else would
>> > like to replicate the results.
>>
>> I'd be curious to look at your scripts and try to replicate some
>> results with our builds.
>
> git clone git://dev.laptop.org/users/quozl/test-
ts),
>>
>>
>> I've also tried running under valgrind, but that causes illegal
>> instruction. It is quite likely I'm not using valgrind correctly.
>> http://dev.laptop.org/~quozl/z/1XRYtO.txt
>>
>> The workaround at the moment is to build our Fedor
Hi Martin,
> I am have been building a Fedora 20 image for the XO4, and I am seeing
> memory corruption problems while running yum in these images (please check
> the logs [1,2]).
The logs don't mean anything to me. What device are you running it on,
how much memory, do you have swap enabled?
>
Hi James,
>> I have been using Daniel Narvaez OOB [1,2], but I want to sync with
>> your OOB repository [3], and I have two questions:
>>
>> 1. Is there a frozen fc20 repository already?
>
> No.
>
> A frozen Fedora 20 package repository would be created when we begin
> stabilisation phase of devel
Hi James,
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 7:05 AM, James Cameron wrote:
> With recent changes to Google Search JavaScript, searching terminates
> Browse with a SIGSEGV, in WTF::dtoa.
>
> http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/4785
>
> This is only seen on an XO-1, in 13.2.1, 13.2.0, all the way back to
> 12.1.
> to be honest I haven't even evaluated alternative distributions because I
> don't think we would have enough resources to do it anyway. We are making
> minor changes to olpc-os-builder, rewriting it for another distribution
> would be a lot of work.
Sorry to be late in replying to this thread b
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Martin Langhoff
wrote:
> From bz traffic, I think these packages are in the process of changing
> to no longer auto-activate systemd services. Not sure which Fedora
> versions these updates will land in.
It's part of Fedora policy, will only be in F-20+
> olpc-os
I suspect the Xorg ABI has changed from F-18 -> F-20 so I suspect
someone with access to the appropriate driver source will need to
rebuild the rpm for the new Xorg ABI.
Peter
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> bash-4.2# cat /var/log/Xorg.0.log
> [32.666]
> X.Org X Ser
r the XO-4 but not the 1.75 (it doesn't have a NEON engine)
Peter
> On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Peter Robinson
> wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Scott Chapman wrote:
>> > I'm not very savvy about video drivers but looking here:
>> >
ports a bunch of OpenGL API's.
It's not the version that's shipped.
> /me confused
>
>
> On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Peter Robinson
> wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 7:55 PM, Scott Chapman wrote:
>> > I'm new to the XO-4. So it
is this broken?
It's not completely broken, just some components.
Peter
>
>
> On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Peter Robinson
> wrote:
>>
>> I don't remember the details of the 13.2.0 build, I seem to remember
>> that it was the last release to include fall b
, May 10, 2014 at 7:50 PM, Scott Chapman wrote:
> That appears to be the version included with the 13.2.0 build?
>
> What build should I downgrade to that will run Gnome correctly? Or is there
> an easy way to get a non-sugar GUI working on one of these?
>
>
> On Sat, May 1
most of the gnome3 stack won't currently run on any of the XOs
Peter
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 7:42 PM, Scott Chapman wrote:
> This affects other gnome commands such as gnome-control-panel as well.
>
>
> On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 12:40 AM, Scott Chapman wrote:
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> I just got an XO-4 and
>>> On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 04:24:39PM +0200, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
>>> > [...] And with the XO stuck on Fedora 18 we might not have good
>>> > enough introspection to make the port compatible with it.
>>>
>>> If anybody would like to work on moving olpc-os-builder to something
>>> more recent, fee
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> oob = ? :)
olpc-os-builder
> On 18 December 2013 16:55, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
>>
>> oob works with F18, then I don't know why would have missing
>> dependencies...
>>
>> Gonzalo
>>
>>
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> oob works with F18, then I don't know why would have missing dependencies...
Because RHEL doesn't ship with all the packages that Fedora does. We
might be OK, I've not checked.
Peter
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 12:
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Kevin Gordon Gmail
wrote:
>
> I have a lead on someone to help in testing and building. However, he's an
> rhel dude.
>
> Does anyone have experience in doing oob, and/or loading sugar on this o/s?
> If so, any hints, pitfalls, or should the usual yum installs be h
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 11:13 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> On 5 November 2013 00:07, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Daniel Narvaez
>> wrote:
>> > Broken annotation in abiword. Trying to figure out the correct one then
>> > I&#
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> Broken annotation in abiword. Trying to figure out the correct one then I'll
> open a bug + patch.
Thanks! Let me know when you've got a patch and I'll test it.
Peter
> On 4 November 2013 22:40, Peter Robinson wr
llowing:
http://paste.fedoraproject.org/51575/38360107/
Thanks,
Peter
> On 4 November 2013 21:25, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 8:13 PM, Daniel Narvaez
>> wrote:
>> > I don't have much of a clue about Write but... can you send the activity
>> &g
0x2e13540>,
dbus.ByteArray('ef47d2e4dc6551ba96f6ceded9023243ea4ee519
', variant_level=1))
> On 4 November 2013 16:14, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 12:45 AM, Daniel Narvaez
>> wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > we are proud to announce the
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 12:45 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we are proud to announce the release of Sugar 0.100.0. A lot is new for both
> users and developers, see the release notes
>
> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.100/Notes
>
> Sources:
>
> http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> No, I never had a koji user.
>
> How can I have one?
Become a Fedora packager.
Peter
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 10:10 PM, James Cameron wrote:
> I agree with Martin on the odd directions Ubuntu is exhibiting; it may
> be safer to target Debian instead, from which support for Ubuntu will
> generally follow.
>
> (On the other hand, I lack evidence to agree with claims about the
> stabil
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 6:54 AM, Basanta Shrestha
wrote:
> Hi,
> We are considering buying an ARM system in order to build Operating System
> Images for XO(1.75 and 4) laptops. Currently we are doing this under
> virtualization environment using "Fedora-17-armhfp-vexpress" which is very
> slow.
>
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 7:39 PM, Juan Cubillo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just flashed a 1.75XO with the stable 13.1.0 image from OLPC. Then, I
> installed OOB via yum install olpc-os-builder
>
> I wanted to build a test image but no example files were installed in
> /usr/share/docs/
>
> Any ideas what
---
>
> olpc-os-12.1.0-xo1.75.ini
>
> Right below [repos] section
>
> --
> [custom_repo]
> local=1,firefox,file:///root/local/
> --
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 1:37 AM, Jerry Vonau wrote:
>>
>>
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 11:50 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> Firefox and xulrunner 17 are the late known good (and matching) builds
>> for Fedora 17, you need the major versions to be matching (so
>> 12/13/17) but if yo
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 6:18 AM, Basanta Shrestha
wrote:
> Please check my repo list at this configuration file.
> http://pastebin.ca/2384881
>
> and xulrunner and firefox version
> xulrunner-13.0-1.fc17.armv7vl
> firefox-12.0-1.fc17.armv7hl
Firefox and xulrunner 17 are the late known good (and m
Hi Daniel,
Would just like to note the wiki needs to be updated as is says 13.1.0
is the devel release "upcoming".
Peter
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 10:15 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We're pleased to announce the release of OLPC OS 13.1.0 for XO-1,
> XO-1.5, XO-1.75 and XO-4. Details of new fe
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Samuel Greenfeld wrote:
> This build is basically usable. Graphics glitches still exist, as the video
> driver has not been updated yet. The Record activity can now record audio
> on XO-4, although Scratch cannot.
>
> If you are working with collaboration with th
virtualized
> OS? Or does qemu runs on bare arm installation virtualizing x86 OS and
> running sugar on that?
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Peter Robinson
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Roshan Karki
>> wrote:
>> >
>&g
A fix is building, it will likely take a day or two to get out to the mirrors.
Peter
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Roshan Karki wrote:
> Here, http://pastebin.com/ueqek3Ri
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Peter Robinson
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 20, 20
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Roshan Karki wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Peter Robinson
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 5:28 AM, Roshan Karki wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 2:44 AM, Samuel Greenfeld
>> > wrote:
&g
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 6:02 AM, Roshan Karki wrote:
> I'm looking for latest available version of Firefox for 1.75. Where can I
> find one? I can't do yum install due to dependency error with xulrunner.
>
> Using 12.1.0
That's the way to get the latest firefox. Can you output the dependency erro
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 5:28 AM, Roshan Karki wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 2:44 AM, Samuel Greenfeld
> wrote:
>>
>> To the best of my knowledge, the XO-1.75 and XO-4 have no hardware-level
>> x86 compatibility. They use processors that use the ARM architecture.
>>
>> If you absolutely need x8
> This new image created via olpc-os-builder won't run on locked XOs, right?
Correct, unless you have a signing key. You really need to generate a
new image though for jffs because of the way the file system works.
Peter
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lis
On 7 Feb 2013 00:31, "Sameer Verma" wrote:
>
> Anybody have any pointers on easy ways to remove GNOME and/or Sugar
> from the 12.1.0 build? I'm trying to get more space to build a server.
> This is on a XO-1.
>
Due to the use of jffs building a custom image using olpc-os-builder is the
way to go.
On 22 Jan 2013 11:14, "Chris Ball" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jan 22 2013, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > - non complete upstream support. Marvell is supporting all their ARM
> > SoCs via the mvebu platform support with components making it upstream
> > beginnin
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 10:11 PM, Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jan 21 2013, John Gilmore wrote:
>> I'm way outside the OLPC & Fedora development processes nowadays, which
>> is why I'm asking what may be a dumb question.
>>
>> The Fedora 18 release is finally out for x86 and x64. There's a
It will land in Fedora 19 so it will be when we rebase to that.
Peter
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 4:06 AM, Chris Leonard wrote:
> FYI,
>
> * New locales: ayc_PE, doi_IN, ia_FR, mni_IN, nhn_MX, niu_NU, niu_NZ,
> sat_IN, and szl_PL.
>
>
> ayc_PE is the Aymara locale developed with our Peruvian colla
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 10:48 PM, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 03:37 +0530, Ajay Garg wrote:
>> Hi all.
>>
>> Where can I find the corresponding source-rpm packages, for ::
>>
>> *
>> http://rpmdropbox.laptop.org/f18/bitfrost-1.0.18-1.fc18.armv7hl.rpm
>>
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 5:19 AM, RJV wrote:
> Implement a shell -- replacing the standard Android shell -- that has the
> main features of Sugar shell
>
> This looks like the nearest to what I hope to achieve - the same experience
> of the XO on a hand-held device especially the Ad-Hoc networking.
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 5:51 AM, Johnson Chetty wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Yes... we're working on getting Sugar on the tablet form factor.
> We're looking at compiling Sugar for an armv7 chip based tablet. (Allwinner
> A10 chip- armhf ). There are many cheap tablets flooding the market here in
> India, so
On 12 Nov 2012 11:18, "Simon Schampijer" wrote:
>
> On 11/11/2012 11:18 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>
>> A new 13.1.0 development build is available.
>>
>> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/13.1.0
>> http://build.laptop.org/13.1.0/os11/
>>
>> C
A new 13.1.0 development build is available.
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/13.1.0
http://build.laptop.org/13.1.0/os11/
Changes:
- The latest sugar component versions that were released on Thursday
- new maliit 0.93.1 release
- Latest XO-4 kernel work for suspend/resume
Thanks for any testing and fee
A new 13.1.0 development build is available:
http://build.laptop.org/13.1.0/os9
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/13.1.0
- The some activity updates
- XO-4 kernel work for 8787/mwifiex wireless, touchscreen improvement, and
I believe some suspend/resume work
Thanks for any testing and feedback!
Note th
>> On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 01:13 +0530, Ajay Garg wrote:
>> > Hi all.
>> >
>> > How is the "Software Update" section
>> > (/usr/share/sugar/extensions/cpsection/updater) installed in
>> > http://build.laptop.org/13.1.0/os7/xo-1.75/ done?
>> >
>> > As I see, the contents of "extensions/cpsection/updat
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 8:08 PM, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 01:13 +0530, Ajay Garg wrote:
>> Hi all.
>>
>> How is the "Software Update" section
>> (/usr/share/sugar/extensions/cpsection/updater) installed in
>> http://build.laptop.org/13.1.0/os7/xo-1.75/ done?
>>
>> As I see, the c
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Jerry Vonau wrote:
>
> As a workaround, maybe edit /etc/yum.repos.d/*.repos and toggle
> gpgcheck= to 0? OOB could do that till the issue is resolved upstream.
It's an ongoing issue, basically we're building packages quicker than
we can sign them. Signing is a man
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 7:40 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Gary C Martin
> wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I was just having a dig around in 13.1.0 build 6 for the XO-4 (using
>> GrandPerspective), and noticed that we are still includin
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Gary C Martin
wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I was just having a dig around in 13.1.0 build 6 for the XO-4 (using
> GrandPerspective), and noticed that we are still including libgweather and
> its 88Mb worth of Locations.xml files. I know this came up in a previous
> re
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 9:23 AM, wrote:
> Martin
> I received my XO-4 today, thanks.
>
> I reflashed to OS5 for XO-4
>
> The touchscreen is out of calibration, up to 10 mm, worse at the screen
> margins. It seemed OK with the OS it came with but I didnt use it for long
> before reflashing.
I b
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Praveen Kumar
wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I am using development 13.1.0 (build 4) for XO-1.75 , and installed totem
> but it's crashing with below message .
What version of totem? The newer totem 3.6 crashing is a known issue
due to its dependency on clutter and we don
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 1:51 AM, Walter Bender wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 7:36 PM, Martin Langhoff
> wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>> The "ball? What ball?" release.
>>>
>>> THIS IS A DEVELOPMENT RELEASE
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 12:36 AM, Martin Langhoff
wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> The "ball? What ball?" release.
>>
>> THIS IS A DEVELOPMENT RELEASE
>
> Users on XO-4 need to be aware of lots of limitations -- no
> suspen
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Chris Leonard wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Gary Martin
> wrote:
>
>>> Are the layouts each in a distinct set of files? If so we could possibly
>>> split out layouts to standalone packages to make it easy to add extras at a
>>> later date.
>>
>> Yes t
On 8 Oct 2012 00:41, "Gary Martin" wrote:
>
> On 7 Oct 2012, at 23:56, Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> >
> > On 7 Oct 2012 23:17, "Martin Langhoff" wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Peter Robinson
wrote:
> > >
On 7 Oct 2012 23:17, "Martin Langhoff" wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Peter Robinson
wrote:
> > #12082 Maliit on-screen keyboard
>
> Yay!!! Is the evdev trickery all hooked up? Does ebook mode DTRT?
Not yet, all the layouts are in and gtk2 work
The "ball? What ball?" release.
THIS IS A DEVELOPMENT RELEASE
Latest sugar builds
GNOME 3.6
Fixed bugs:
#12082 Maliit on-screen keyboard
#12088 Browse died on XO-1 with SIGILL in 13.1.0
Activity changes:
-Abacus-37
-Browse-141
+Abacus-39
+Browse-142
-Clock-9
+Clock-10
-ImageViewer-21
+ImageVi
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 5:22 AM, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> Just a quick outline of one experiment to see if simple Win32
> "content-ware" apps can be run. Commands may be missing switches,
> options and steps. Caveat reader. BYO smarts.
>
> On x87 host F17
> - install livecd-tools spin-kickstarts
>
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 1:17 AM, Sameer Verma wrote:
> "Up until now there has been a separate Linux kernel build for each of
> the ARM platforms or SoCs, which is one of the several problems when
> it comes to ARM based Linux. The merging of ARM multi-platform support
> into Linux 3.7 will put an
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 2:51 AM, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> I would like to propose a feature for discussion and inclusion in the
> 0.98 cycle is packaging all control-panel applets as rpms. As this
> discussion does not impact the UI and more of a packaging issue I'm an
> not creating a Fea
The "Fly away Peter, fly away Paul" release.
THIS IS A DEVELOPMENT RELEASE
This is the first release adding support for the XO-4
Fixed bugs:
#12126 Portfolio not included on XO-1.75 but is included on XO-1.5
#12082 Maliit on-screen keyboard
#11907 Sound device not closed after playing sound i
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Martin Langhoff
wrote:
> Last week, we heard feedback on 12.1.0 from a deployment, asking "why
> did you lock down GNOME so much? it's unusable!".
>
> Today, I see this bug report, essentially pointing out 'regressions'
> in our GNOME desktop - http://dev.laptop.or
t; wad
>
> On Sep 18, 2012, at 1:59 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> > This is an interesting HTML5 geometry app that works with
> > tablets/touch. Would be interesting to see how well it works on the
> > XO-Touch.
> >
> > http://www.sketchometry.com/
> &
This is an interesting HTML5 geometry app that works with
tablets/touch. Would be interesting to see how well it works on the
XO-Touch.
http://www.sketchometry.com/
The BBC reported that it was open source, I can't see the details as
to whether it is or not, it's certainly based on some open sour
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 5:04 AM, James Cameron wrote:
> For deployments that eschew servers, a caching proxy won't help. But
> on the other hand, sharing the updates across a bunch of XOs might be
> possible using a torrent-like implementation.
Facebook uses torrents to distribute their rpm and w
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 1:59 AM, Sridhar Dhanapalan
wrote:
> On 30 July 2012 23:26, Jerry Vonau wrote:
>> The idea works well for users of Dextrose where OLPC-AU as a deployment
>> could omit features that are still under development and not show the
>> icon the control-panel at all. I'm not askin
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 3:43 AM, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-07-30 at 00:20 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 7:51 PM, Jerry Vonau wrote:
>> >> I would like to propose a feature f
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 7:51 PM, Jerry Vonau wrote:
>> I would like to propose a feature for discussion and inclusion in the
>> 0.98 cycle is packaging all control-panel applets as rpms. As this
>> discussion does not impact the UI and more o
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 7:51 PM, Jerry Vonau wrote:
>> I would like to propose a feature for discussion and inclusion in the
>> 0.98 cycle is packaging all control-panel applets as rpms. As this
>> discussion does not impact the UI and more o
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 6:56 AM, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> Just looking at the current 0.96-3 src.rpm for sugar and wondering if
> sugar-gnomekeyring.patch should be somewhere else other than in the
> sugar package. This is a one time configuration that the olpc-utils[1]
> package currently
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:13:22PM +0530, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
>> The approach I have taken with other releases is to flash the NAND, add
>> some activities with a customization stick [1], and then use the
>> NAND-blaster to copy the
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Ajay Garg wrote:
> Thanks Jerry, Anish.
>
> That was it.
> Removing the "glibc-devel" package from "/etc/yum/olpc-exclude" did the
> trick.
>
> But me just curious, why is "/etc/yum/olpc-exclude" needed?
>
>
> [
> Also, on a side-note, my original issue of compili
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Just wondering, with the rework of sugar-presence-service[1] that was
> done for sugar-0.90, is there any requirement for sugar-toolkit to have
> a dependency on sugar-presence-service in F14 or F17?
No, it's deprecated, the only
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 9:29 PM, Kevin Gordon wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Peter Robinson
> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 9:01 PM, Ajay Garg
>> wrote:
>> > Peter,
>> >
>> > Could you let me know which repo w
e core OS build but it will allow any other
packages to be installed.
Peter
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 1:14 AM, Peter Robinson
> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Ajay Garg
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 12:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Ajay Garg wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 12:39 AM, Peter Robinson
> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Ajay Garg
>> wrote:
>> > Hi all.
>> >
>> > I am trying to build "avahi"
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Ajay Garg wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I am trying to build "avahi" on my XO-1.75.
>
> Building "avahi" requires "glibc-devel" as one of its dependent packages.
>
> Very, very surprisingly, there is no "glibc-devel" present in the ARM repos
> (for armv5tel/armv7tel) !!
>
; On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 8:21 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 12:29 PM, George Hunt
>> wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > On a XO-1.75 with a new install of build 21016o2.zd:
>> >
>> > "yum install mlocate&q
m.
Peter
> I read on the fedora wiki that userland armv7hl and armv7l complied programs
> don't mix. But your assurance that the XO is really armv7hl is what I
> couldn't find easily on the web.
For queries like that it's likely easier to ask on list or just ping
me on I
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 12:29 PM, George Hunt wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On a XO-1.75 with a new install of build 21016o2.zd:
>
> "yum install mlocate" returns the error: cannot retrieve metalink for
> repository fedora.
>
> Issuing URLGRABBER_DEBUG=1 "yum check-update" returns lots of stuff -- most
>
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 6:48 PM, Jon Nettleton wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>> I was just going on the logs from git and we have 2.0.13 and according
>>> to the logs 2.0.1
1 - 100 of 583 matches
Mail list logo
