This is quite interesting.
Recently, I finished my dissertation on mobile development directly
from mobile devices. Something like this might've been very useful,
although I did target experienced developers, not beginners.
Do you plan to make it self-hosted? I guess that wouldn't be possible
2010/8/10 NoiseEHC noise...@freemail.hu:
We used to do that, the problem is that we don't control our platform
as Google controls Android and you need to make sure that resources
that need to be specific of each child process aren't shared (dbus and
X connections, etc).
I'm personally more
On 9 August 2010 11:25, Bert Freudenberg b...@freudenbergs.de wrote:
On 09.08.2010, at 01:21, John Gilmore wrote:
As long as activities are saving and restoring properly it could be
made pretty much transparent to the user. Of course that's easier
said then done...
Android has a whole
On 9 August 2010 14:44, NoiseEHC noise...@freemail.hu wrote:
Sugar has a similar mechanism. From the Low-level Activity API docs:
org.laptop.Activity.SetActive(b: active)
Activate or passivate an activity. This is sent when switching activities,
there is only one active activity at a time,
On 8 August 2010 20:33, Marco Pesenti Gritti ma...@marcopg.org wrote:
On 8 Aug 2010, at 18:40, Tiago Marques tiago...@gmail.com wrote:
The idea of killing activities with the content closed seems ok but it would
probably be a good idea to have a way to opt out of it for some apps. I'm
On 8 August 2010 20:51, Marco Pesenti Gritti ma...@marcopg.org wrote:
On 8 Aug 2010, at 20:38, Lucian Branescu lucian.brane...@gmail.com wrote:
Imo a confirmation popup would become annoying very quickly. Also if the
user refuses, the kernel will have soon to kill an activity, which is worst
On 20 July 2010 23:54, C. Scott Ananian csc...@cscott.net wrote:
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Reuben K. Caron reu...@laptop.org wrote:
deployments that would like to install content bundles. They package
these files into .xol packages and these packages get installed into
the Library,
I did a quick and not-so-scientific benchmark. The test involves a
round trip for a small json file 10 times.
cjson7.56759595871
simplejson-c 9.09944200516
simplejson-pure 58.1605060101
2009/11/13 Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org:
On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 10:53 +0100, Martin
The json module (simplejson) has only the parser written in C, so it's
still slower overall than cjson. Not by a lot, but measurable.
2009/11/12 Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
Then maybe yes, I am
There's a GMail labs feature that allows you do undo in the first
30secs after sending. Very useful.
2009/11/10 Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sugar 0.84.2 (as seen on the OLPC F11 builds)... is it
Slightly off-topic, has anyone tried compcache
(http://code.google.com/p/compcache/) on an XO-1? I might if I can get
it to work.
2009/11/8 Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org:
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 12:06, Martin Dengler mar...@martindengler.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 04:50:53PM +,
Does anyone know how gecko 1.9.1's full page zoom interacts with canvas?
2009/5/16 Albert Cahalan acaha...@gmail.com:
Martin Langhoff writes:
The short version of it is that canvas (and image rendering in
general) is hurting lots due to the dpi being hardcoded to 134
which forces Gecko into
I was thinking whether it has some scaling optimisations, since it
does a lot of it with the zoom.
2009/5/17 Mihai Sucan mihai.su...@gmail.com:
Le Sun, 17 May 2009 14:30:16 +0300, Lucian Branescu
lucian.brane...@gmail.com a écrit:
Does anyone know how gecko 1.9.1's full page zoom interacts
This is very interesting, similar to the problem Qt used to have on Maemo.
I was always surprised by report of canvas being slow on the XO,
it's probably the fastest and the lowest overhead drawing technology
available to JavaScript.
2009/5/15 Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com:
On Fri,
, which was done for Qt 4.5
It is possible that Gecko has some options to allow it to draw fast at
various DPI settings. Maybe we should ask the mozilla folk?
2009/5/15 Mihai Sucan mihai.su...@gmail.com:
Le Fri, 15 May 2009 15:26:42 +0300, Lucian Branescu
lucian.brane...@gmail.com a écrit
15 matches
Mail list logo
