Re: XO's cannot use mirror repo's in YUM update or install

On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 5:29 AM Carrol Riddle wrote: > > XO's attempting to run YUM update or install are unable to use fedora mirror > sites (https://) but able to use primary fedora site (http://). > > Is this a matter of https vs http / ca-certificates or changes in mirror > structures ?

Re: [Server-devel] serious Raspbian WiFi flaw discovered: works for 10SEC then cycles OFF/ON

>> We need to report this to the Raspberry Pi Foundation to see if they can >> fix it -- WiFi connections are repeatedly failing, sometimes even very soon >> after booting, profoundly affecting Internet-in-a-Box 6.5 ! >> >> But first a big Thanks In Advance to all who can reproduce this & offer >>

Re: Devel Digest, Vol 132, Issue 2

h the person managing the list at >> devel-ow...@lists.laptop.org >> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >> than "Re: Contents of Devel digest..." >> >> >> Today's Topics: >> >> 1. Porting

Re: Porting XO laptops to newer Linux kernels

On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 4:28 AM, Samuel Greenfeld wrote: > It has been a few years (Fedora 18) since the original XO Laptop series has > had any sort of major Operating System update. > > In order to support newer versions of Systemd, features found in newer > versions of

Re: [Server-devel] Apache 2.4.6 on CentOS and 2.4.10 on Debian/Raspbian

On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 1:37 AM, Adam Holt wrote: > Just FYI... > > Apache 2.4.6 was released July ~19, 2013 (used by IIAB/XSCE 6.2 on CentOS). > > Apache 2.4.10 was released Jule ~19, 2014 (used by IIAB/XSCE 6.2 on > Debian/Raspbian). > > Apache 2.4.25 was release Dec ~19,

Re: [Server-devel] ssh.service error on CentOS 7.3

On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 9:07 PM, Adam Holt wrote: > IIAB/XSCE 6.2 is installed on CentOS 7.3 on a NUC, and this error message > appears whenever I open a Terminal: > >Redirecting to /bin/systemctl status ssh.service >Unit ssh.service could not be found. > > Does anyone

Re: [Server-devel] Fedora 24 released / Fedora 22 "end-of-life" July 19 2016

On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 5:26 PM, Adam Holt <h...@laptop.org> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 6:23 AM, Peter Robinson <pbrobin...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Adam Holt <h...@laptop.org> wrote: >> > Congrats to the F2

Re: [Server-devel] Raspberry Pi 3

On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 3:49 PM, Tim Moody wrote: > For those who wish to experiment I have added several rpi3 images to > http://xsce.org/downloads/xsce-release-6.0/rpi-images/ Fedora 25 will have Raspberry Pi support for both the RPi2 and RPi3 as part of Beta due in a couple

Re: [Server-devel] Fedora 24 released / Fedora 22 "end-of-life" July 19 2016

; On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 3:23 AM, Peter Robinson <pbrobin...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Adam Holt <h...@laptop.org> wrote: >> > Congrats to the F24 Team: >> > >> > The strategic question from a broad deployment pe

Re: [Server-devel] Fedora 24 released / Fedora 22 "end-of-life" July 19 2016

On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Adam Holt wrote: > Congrats to the F24 Team: > > The strategic question from a broad deployment perspective across the > world's lower-middle class is increasingly Raspberry Pi support, according > to so many grassroots/field groups I'm speaking

Re: [Server-devel] Fwd: Announcing the release of Fedora 24 Beta for aarch64!

On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 9:39 PM, Adam Holt <h...@laptop.org> wrote: > On May 10, 2016 3:21 PM, "Peter Robinson" <pbrobin...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> We do have initial pine64 support, I plan to improve it more for GA and >> have a disk imag

Re: [Server-devel] Fwd: Announcing the release of Fedora 24 Beta for aarch64!

We do have initial pine64 support, I plan to improve it more for GA and have a disk image for use. Peter On 10 May 2016 18:44, "Adam Holt" <h...@laptop.org> wrote: > Not sure the 64-bit implications of this for RPi3 and Pine64, but FYI. > -- Forwarded message ---

Re: [Server-devel] [XSCE] Re: [UKids] Raspberri Pi/clone(s) most ruggedizable for OLPC fieldwork?

is more work to get to F24. I agree that we want to get there. > >> -Original Message- >> From: Peter Robinson [mailto:pbrobin...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2016 6:42 AM >> To: Tim Moody <t...@timmoody.com> >> Cc: xsce-de...@googlegroups

Re: [Server-devel] [XSCE] Re: [UKids] Raspberri Pi/clone(s) most ruggedizable for OLPC fieldwork?

On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 8:15 PM, Tim Moody wrote: > For xsce I'd start with f22. You can look at the rpi images on > xsce.org/downloads They're 32 bit ARMv7 are they not? Personally I'd be starting with Fedora 24 as you'll have support until July 2017, instead of the 3 or so

Re: [Server-devel] [UKids] Raspberri Pi/clone(s) most ruggedizable for OLPC fieldwork?

On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 7:23 PM, Adam Holt wrote: > Awesome we can start banging on this long-awaited HW!. > > Who can recommend the best/emerging/viable Fedora 22 vs. 23 vs. 24 options > to Alex? Fedora 24 definitely here, I'll actually be producing aarch64 images shortly for

Re: [Server-devel] Rapberri Pi/clone(s) most ruggidizable for OLPC fieldwork?

> You are the expert here (on the low end especially, with $5 Raspberri Pi > Zeros!) leading OLE refugee camp deployments across many countries. Whereas > most OLPC-like schools I talk to want to spend $100 (or more) for a > mini-server that's truly resilient for years in tropical environments, >

Re: [Server-devel] Rapberri Pi/clone(s) most ruggidizable for OLPC fieldwork?

> You are the expert here (on the low end especially, with $5 Raspberri Pi > Zeros!) leading OLE refugee camp deployments across many countries. Whereas > most OLPC-like schools I talk to want to spend $100 (or more) for a > mini-server that's truly resilient for years in tropical environments, >

Re: [Server-devel] Raspberry Pi/clone(s) most ruggedizable for OLPC fieldwork?

On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Adam Holt <h...@laptop.org> wrote: > On Feb 7, 2016 3:22 AM, "Peter Robinson" <pbrobin...@gmail.com> wrote: >> things like >> the PINE64 above it has a SoC attached network but not storage. > > Both SATA (real TB+ disk

Re: Raspberry Pi/clone(s) most ruggedizable for OLPC fieldwork?

On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Adam Holt <h...@laptop.org> wrote: > On Feb 7, 2016 3:22 AM, "Peter Robinson" <pbrobin...@gmail.com> wrote: >> things like >> the PINE64 above it has a SoC attached network but not storage. > > Both SATA (real TB+ disk

Re: [Server-devel] Two (minimal) goals for a kernel for XO1.5 based upon fc22?

On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 4:17 AM, Samuel Greenfeld sam...@greenfeld.org wrote: Given I looked into this before with F22 Beta(*), I ran OLPC OS Builder tonight, excluding nothing from all repositories, and let it loose. Funny! I was doing exactly the same yesterday for the 1.5! There were a few

Re: [Server-devel] Two (minimal) goals for a kernel for XO1.5 based upon fc22?

On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 4:17 AM, Samuel Greenfeld sam...@greenfeld.org wrote: Given I looked into this before with F22 Beta(*), I ran OLPC OS Builder tonight, excluding nothing from all repositories, and let it loose. Funny! I was doing exactly the same yesterday for the 1.5! There were a few

Re: [Server-devel] Two (minimal) goals for a kernel for XO1.5 based upon fc22?

On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 9:05 AM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: The v4.1-rc5 kernel boots fine on XO-1.5, though there are a few things to be fixed; screen blanks on boot, camera LED stays on and camera doesn't work, temperature of CPU is not accessible, and suspend fails to complete.

Re: [Server-devel] Two (minimal) goals for a kernel for XO1.5 based upon fc22?

BTW is the F-22 + 4.1rc5 kernel image somewhere to pull and test with? On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 12:01 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 9:05 AM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: The v4.1-rc5 kernel boots fine on XO-1.5, though there are a few things

Re: [Server-devel] Two (minimal) goals for a kernel for XO1.5 based upon fc22?

On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 9:05 AM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: The v4.1-rc5 kernel boots fine on XO-1.5, though there are a few things to be fixed; screen blanks on boot, camera LED stays on and camera doesn't work, temperature of CPU is not accessible, and suspend fails to complete.

Re: [Server-devel] Two (minimal) goals for a kernel for XO1.5 based upon fc22?

Given I looked into this before with F22 Beta(*), I ran OLPC OS Builder tonight, excluding nothing from all repositories, and let it loose. Funny! I was doing exactly the same yesterday for the 1.5! There were a few more minor issues found with the build process. But I managed to build

Re: [Server-devel] Two (minimal) goals for a kernel for XO1.5 based upon fc22?

Given I looked into this before with F22 Beta(*), I ran OLPC OS Builder tonight, excluding nothing from all repositories, and let it loose. Funny! I was doing exactly the same yesterday for the 1.5! There were a few more minor issues found with the build process. But I managed to build

Re: [Sugar-devel] Community XO software builds

On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 12:04 AM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 10:28:06AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 4:21 AM, Samuel Greenfeld sam...@greenfeld.org wrote: The obvious counterargument would be that a deployment might want to deploy

Re: [Sugar-devel] Community XO software builds

On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 12:10 AM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 09:19:45AM -0300, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: I think we should try make a build using CentOS. I don't know if have all the packages we need, but the rate of change in Fedora was difficult to follow when

Re: [Sugar-devel] Community XO software builds

On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 4:21 AM, Samuel Greenfeld sam...@greenfeld.org wrote: The obvious counterargument would be that a deployment might want to deploy your XO-Next (whatever it is) alongside existing XO laptops, allowing all of them to have the same configuration. From my memory of

Re: [Sugar-devel] Community XO software builds

Ok. I didn't know that. When I talked with deployments and they ask for Ubuntu, and I ask why, what they really want is Long Time Support. No deployment change their image more than once a year. In fact, change a image is a logistic challenge for most of the big/middle size deployments.

Re: XO Fedora 22 Beta work

On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 5:10 AM, Samuel Greenfeld sam...@greenfeld.org wrote: At James' suggestion I looked a bit into a Fedora 22 beta build. I have found the following problems so far getting the RPM dependencies worked out: olpc-library needs to depend on python-jinja2, not python-jinja.

Re: [Sugar-devel] XO Fedora 22 Beta work

On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 8:50 PM, Adam Holt h...@laptop.org wrote: On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 1:10 AM, Samuel Greenfeld sam...@greenfeld.org wrote: At James' suggestion I looked a bit into a Fedora 22 beta build. I

Re: [Sugar-devel] XO-1 vs Sugar 0.104 performance, and swap to NAND Flash

On 07/04/15 22:47, James Cameron wrote: The testing scripts can be made available if anybody else would like to replicate the results. I'd be curious to look at your scripts and try to replicate some results with our builds. git clone

Re: Infrequent heap corruption, XO-4, Fedora 20

kernel is being used for Fedora 18 and Fedora 20. On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 03:55:24PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: What version of OOB are you using, and what config files? I can try and recreate the problem here on other devices. -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ -- James

Re: [Server-devel] UEFI workaround?

On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Adam Holt h...@laptop.org wrote: Tony Anderson’s is leaving to Africa in 6 days, assisting many different school server deployments, and needs help getting around secure BIOS/firmware UEFI on the following platforms: - NUC 34010 - BIOS upgrade solves this, by

Re: [Server-devel] Fwd: [XSCE] UEFI workaround?

So to confirm there is no support for Secure Boot in RHEL-6 and hence CentOS-6. For this to work you'll definitely need CentOS7. If the NUC devices are baytrail the issue might not actually be SecureBoot at all but rather that they have a 32 bit uEFI implementation and that's not currently

Re: [Server-devel] raspi project

On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Tim Moody t...@timmoody.com wrote: I personally have not had much luck with Indiegogo as far as actually getting stuff is concerned, but an interesting project if rather expensive.

Re: [Server-devel] raspi project

testing/specs — I guess nobody will ever drop it… And kids aren't rough wit things at all... ever ;-) On Oct 16, 2014, at 9:27 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Tim Moody t...@timmoody.com wrote: I personally have not had much luck with Indiegogo

Re: Yum random crashes in XO4 f20 images

Hi Martin, I am have been building a Fedora 20 image for the XO4, and I am seeing memory corruption problems while running yum in these images (please check the logs [1,2]). The logs don't mean anything to me. What device are you running it on, how much memory, do you have swap enabled? To

Re: WebKit uses SSE XMM and breaks on XO-1

Hi James, On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 7:05 AM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: With recent changes to Google Search JavaScript, searching terminates Browse with a SIGSEGV, in WTF::dtoa. http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/4785 This is only seen on an XO-1, in 13.2.1, 13.2.0, all the way back

Re: [Sugar-devel] XO on Fedora 20 (was Re: [GSoC] Porting To Python3)

to be honest I haven't even evaluated alternative distributions because I don't think we would have enough resources to do it anyway. We are making minor changes to olpc-os-builder, rewriting it for another distribution would be a lot of work. Sorry to be late in replying to this thread but

Re: Minor changes to olpc-kbdshim and olpc-powerd

On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote: From bz traffic, I think these packages are in the process of changing to no longer auto-activate systemd services. Not sure which Fedora versions these updates will land in. It's part of Fedora policy, will only

Re: [Sugar-devel] XO on Fedora 20 (was Re: [GSoC] Porting To Python3)

I suspect the Xorg ABI has changed from F-18 - F-20 so I suspect someone with access to the appropriate driver source will need to rebuild the rpm for the new Xorg ABI. Peter On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote: bash-4.2# cat /var/log/Xorg.0.log [

Re: gnome applet can't initialize Clutter

most of the gnome3 stack won't currently run on any of the XOs Peter On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 7:42 PM, Scott Chapman sc...@mischko.com wrote: This affects other gnome commands such as gnome-control-panel as well. On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 12:40 AM, Scott Chapman sc...@mischko.com wrote: Hi!

Re: gnome applet can't initialize Clutter

, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: most of the gnome3 stack won't currently run on any of the XOs Peter On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 7:42 PM, Scott Chapman sc...@mischko.com wrote: This affects other gnome commands such as gnome-control-panel as well. On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 12:40

Re: gnome applet can't initialize Clutter

? It's not completely broken, just some components. Peter On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: I don't remember the details of the 13.2.0 build, I seem to remember that it was the last release to include fall back mode. The gnome3 fallback mode had

Re: gnome applet can't initialize Clutter

of OpenGL API's. It's not the version that's shipped. /me confused On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 7:55 PM, Scott Chapman sc...@mischko.com wrote: I'm new to the XO-4. So it appears that nobody is running a GUI besides

Re: gnome applet can't initialize Clutter

have a NEON engine) Peter On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Scott Chapman sc...@mischko.com wrote: I'm not very savvy about video drivers but looking here: http://www.vivantecorp.com/technology/3d.html It shows

Re: [Sugar-devel] XO on Fedora 20 (was Re: [GSoC] Porting To Python3)

On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 04:24:39PM +0200, Daniel Narvaez wrote: [...] And with the XO stuck on Fedora 18 we might not have good enough introspection to make the port compatible with it. If anybody would like to work on moving olpc-os-builder to something more recent, feel free. It isn't

Re: Rhel

On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Kevin Gordon Gmail kgordon...@gmail.com wrote: I have a lead on someone to help in testing and building. However, he's an rhel dude. Does anyone have experience in doing oob, and/or loading sugar on this o/s? If so, any hints, pitfalls, or should the usual

Re: Rhel

, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Kevin Gordon Gmail kgordon...@gmail.com wrote: I have a lead on someone to help in testing and building. However, he's an rhel dude. Does anyone have experience in doing oob, and/or loading sugar on this o/s

Re: Rhel

PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Kevin Gordon Gmail kgordon...@gmail.com wrote: I have a lead on someone to help in testing and building. However, he's an rhel dude. Does anyone have experience in doing oob, and/or loading sugar

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar 0.100.0 (stable)

On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 11:13 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: On 5 November 2013 00:07, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: Broken annotation in abiword. Trying to figure out the correct one

Re: [Server-devel] mesh potato

On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Tony Anderson tony_ander...@usa.net wrote: Hi, There was discussion of this at the SF sprint. As I understand it, openWRT (from the Shuttleworth project) can be installed on a TP-Link router. It can be configured to serve connected XOs (such as in a

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar 0.100.0 (stable)

On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 12:45 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, we are proud to announce the release of Sugar 0.100.0. A lot is new for both users and developers, see the release notes http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.100/Notes Sources:

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar 0.100.0 (stable)

, dbus.ByteArray('ef47d2e4dc6551ba96f6ceded9023243ea4ee519 ', variant_level=1)) On 4 November 2013 16:14, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 12:45 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, we are proud to announce the release of Sugar 0.100.0. A lot

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar 0.100.0 (stable)

: http://paste.fedoraproject.org/51575/38360107/ Thanks, Peter On 4 November 2013 21:25, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 8:13 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: I don't have much of a clue about Write but... can you send the activity log

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar 0.100.0 (stable)

On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: Broken annotation in abiword. Trying to figure out the correct one then I'll open a bug + patch. Thanks! Let me know when you've got a patch and I'll test it. Peter On 4 November 2013 22:40, Peter Robinson pbrobin

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity Central's Sugar related priorities.

On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 10:10 PM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: I agree with Martin on the odd directions Ubuntu is exhibiting; it may be safer to target Debian instead, from which support for Ubuntu will generally follow. (On the other hand, I lack evidence to agree with claims about

Re: [Sugar-devel] [support-gang] Helping test Sugar 0.100

On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote: No, I never had a koji user. How can I have one? Become a Fedora packager. Peter ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel

Re: [fedora-arm] Seeking advice to buy ARM system.

On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 6:54 AM, Basanta Shrestha basanta.shres...@olenepal.org wrote: Hi, We are considering buying an ARM system in order to build Operating System Images for XO(1.75 and 4) laptops. Currently we are doing this under virtualization environment using Fedora-17-armhfp-vexpress

Re: OOB V6.0 does not installs example ini files

On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 7:39 PM, Juan Cubillo jcubi...@fundacionqt.org wrote: Hello, I just flashed a 1.75XO with the stable 13.1.0 image from OLPC. Then, I installed OOB via yum install olpc-os-builder I wanted to build a test image but no example files were installed in /usr/share/docs/

Re: Install Firefox

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote: On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 11:50 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: Firefox and xulrunner 17 are the late known good (and matching) builds for Fedora 17, you need the major versions to be matching (so 12/13/17

Re: Install Firefox

] section -- [custom_repo] local=1,firefox,file:///root/local/ -- On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 1:37 AM, Jerry Vonau jvo...@shaw.ca wrote: On Thu, 2013-05-30 at 15:22 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Daniel Drake d

Re: Install Firefox

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 6:18 AM, Basanta Shrestha basanta.shres...@olenepal.org wrote: Please check my repo list at this configuration file. http://pastebin.ca/2384881 and xulrunner and firefox version xulrunner-13.0-1.fc17.armv7vl firefox-12.0-1.fc17.armv7hl Firefox and xulrunner 17 are

Re: Announcing OLPC OS 13.1.0

Hi Daniel, Would just like to note the wiki needs to be updated as is says 13.1.0 is the devel release upcoming. Peter On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 10:15 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote: Hi, We're pleased to announce the release of OLPC OS 13.1.0 for XO-1, XO-1.5, XO-1.75 and XO-4. Details

Re: [Server-devel] Cubieboard - linux-sunxi

On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 11:12 PM, Sameer Verma sve...@sfsu.edu wrote: Another ARM board, courtesy of Robert Howard. http://linux-sunxi.org/Cubieboard There's a Fedora 18 remix image that will work with this device available. Peter ___ Server-devel

Re: 13.1.0 build 32 for XO-4 released

On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Samuel Greenfeld greenf...@laptop.org wrote: This build is basically usable. Graphics glitches still exist, as the video driver has not been updated yet. The Record activity can now record audio on XO-4, although Scratch cannot. If you are working with

Re: Adobe Flash for XO-4 and XO-1.75

and virtualized OS? Or does qemu runs on bare arm installation virtualizing x86 OS and running sugar on that? On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Roshan Karki ros...@olenepal.org wrote: On Wed, Feb 20, 2013

Re: Adobe Flash for XO-4 and XO-1.75

On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 5:28 AM, Roshan Karki ros...@olenepal.org wrote: On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 2:44 AM, Samuel Greenfeld greenf...@laptop.org wrote: To the best of my knowledge, the XO-1.75 and XO-4 have no hardware-level x86 compatibility. They use processors that use the ARM architecture.

Re: Firefox for 1.75

On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 6:02 AM, Roshan Karki ros...@olenepal.org wrote: I'm looking for latest available version of Firefox for 1.75. Where can I find one? I can't do yum install due to dependency error with xulrunner. Using 12.1.0 That's the way to get the latest firefox. Can you output the

Re: Adobe Flash for XO-4 and XO-1.75

On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Roshan Karki ros...@olenepal.org wrote: On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 5:28 AM, Roshan Karki ros...@olenepal.org wrote: On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 2:44 AM, Samuel Greenfeld greenf

Re: Firefox for 1.75

A fix is building, it will likely take a day or two to get out to the mirrors. Peter On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Roshan Karki ros...@olenepal.org wrote: Here, http://pastebin.com/ueqek3Ri On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Feb 20

Re: removing GNOME and maybe Sugar

This new image created via olpc-os-builder won't run on locked XOs, right? Correct, unless you have a signing key. You really need to generate a new image though for jffs because of the way the file system works. Peter ___ Devel mailing list

Re: removing GNOME and maybe Sugar

On 7 Feb 2013 00:31, Sameer Verma sve...@sfsu.edu wrote: Anybody have any pointers on easy ways to remove GNOME and/or Sugar from the 12.1.0 build? I'm trying to get more space to build a server. This is on a XO-1. Due to the use of jffs building a custom image using olpc-os-builder is the

Re: Fedora-18 ARM release: support for OLPC hardware?

On 22 Jan 2013 11:14, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote: Hi, On Tue, Jan 22 2013, Peter Robinson wrote: - non complete upstream support. Marvell is supporting all their ARM SoCs via the mvebu platform support with components making it upstream beginning in 3.7 but it's not all there yet

Re: Fedora-18 ARM release: support for OLPC hardware?

On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 10:11 PM, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote: Hi, On Mon, Jan 21 2013, John Gilmore wrote: I'm way outside the OLPC Fedora development processes nowadays, which is why I'm asking what may be a dumb question. The Fedora 18 release is finally out for x86 and x64.

Re: [Server-devel] Hardware for Schoolservers (EDIT)

On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 8:46 PM, German Ruiz germa...@opensuse.org.ni wrote: Hello everyone Sorry, last message was sent without finish. Just asking if anyone here knows about fanless server in the field, in any country, i was looking at the wiki[1], and the only information about hardware

Re: The GNU C Library version 2.17 is now available.

It will land in Fedora 19 so it will be when we rebase to that. Peter On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 4:06 AM, Chris Leonard cjlhomeaddr...@gmail.com wrote: FYI, * New locales: ayc_PE, doi_IN, ia_FR, mni_IN, nhn_MX, niu_NU, niu_NZ, sat_IN, and szl_PL. ayc_PE is the Aymara locale developed with

Re: Locations for bitfrost src-rpm packages

On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 10:48 PM, Jerry Vonau jvo...@shaw.ca wrote: On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 03:37 +0530, Ajay Garg wrote: Hi all. Where can I find the corresponding source-rpm packages, for :: * http://rpmdropbox.laptop.org/f18/bitfrost-1.0.18-1.fc18.armv7hl.rpm

Re: Porting Sugar on Android (Ice cream sandwich)

On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 5:19 AM, RJV jv.ravichand...@gmail.com wrote: Implement a shell -- replacing the standard Android shell -- that has the main features of Sugar shell This looks like the nearest to what I hope to achieve - the same experience of the XO on a hand-held device especially

Re: [Sugar-devel] OLPC OS on Zync Z930 Tablet

On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 5:51 AM, Johnson Chetty johnsonche...@gmail.com wrote: Hey, Yes... we're working on getting Sugar on the tablet form factor. We're looking at compiling Sugar for an armv7 chip based tablet. (Allwinner A10 chip- armhf ). There are many cheap tablets flooding the market

Re: [Techteam] 13.1.0 development build 11 released

On 12 Nov 2012 11:18, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote: On 11/11/2012 11:18 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: A new 13.1.0 development build is available. http://wiki.laptop.org/go/13.1.0 http://build.laptop.org/13.1.0/os11/ Changes: - The latest sugar component versions that were

13.1.0 development build 11 released

A new 13.1.0 development build is available. http://wiki.laptop.org/go/13.1.0 http://build.laptop.org/13.1.0/os11/ Changes: - The latest sugar component versions that were released on Thursday - new maliit 0.93.1 release - Latest XO-4 kernel work for suspend/resume Thanks for any testing and

13.1.0 development build 9 released

A new 13.1.0 development build is available: http://build.laptop.org/13.1.0/os9 http://wiki.laptop.org/go/13.1.0 - The some activity updates - XO-4 kernel work for 8787/mwifiex wireless, touchscreen improvement, and I believe some suspend/resume work Thanks for any testing and feedback! Note

Re: Software Update section

On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 8:08 PM, Jerry Vonau jvo...@shaw.ca wrote: On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 01:13 +0530, Ajay Garg wrote: Hi all. How is the Software Update section (/usr/share/sugar/extensions/cpsection/updater) installed in http://build.laptop.org/13.1.0/os7/xo-1.75/ done? As I see, the

Re: Software Update section

On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 01:13 +0530, Ajay Garg wrote: Hi all. How is the Software Update section (/usr/share/sugar/extensions/cpsection/updater) installed in http://build.laptop.org/13.1.0/os7/xo-1.75/ done? As I see, the contents of extensions/cpsection/updater present on the

Re: Installing patch on XO-4

On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Jerry Vonau jvo...@shaw.ca wrote: As a workaround, maybe edit /etc/yum.repos.d/*.repos and toggle gpgcheck= to 0? OOB could do that till the issue is resolved upstream. It's an ongoing issue, basically we're building packages quicker than we can sign them.

Re: Opportunities to slim down 13.1.0 build file cruft

On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Gary C Martin garycmar...@googlelibgweathermail.com wrote: Hi folks, I was just having a dig around in 13.1.0 build 6 for the XO-4 (using GrandPerspective), and noticed that we are still including libgweather and its 88Mb worth of Locations.xml files. I know

Re: Opportunities to slim down 13.1.0 build file cruft

On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 7:40 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Gary C Martin garycmar...@googlelibgweathermail.com wrote: Hi folks, I was just having a dig around in 13.1.0 build 6 for the XO-4 (using GrandPerspective), and noticed that we

Re: XO-4 B1 units

On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 9:23 AM, fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote: Martin I received my XO-4 today, thanks. I reflashed to OS5 for XO-4 The touchscreen is out of calibration, up to 10 mm, worse at the screen margins. It seemed OK with the OS it came with but I didnt use it for long before

Re: [bug-report][build4 - 13.1.0] Totem is crashing in Gnome

On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Praveen Kumar kumarpraveen.nit...@gmail.com wrote: Hi folks, I am using development 13.1.0 (build 4) for XO-1.75 , and installed totem but it's crashing with below message . What version of totem? The newer totem 3.6 crashing is a known issue due to its

Re: [Techteam] 13.1.0 devel build 5 released, for the XO-1, XO-1.5, XO-1.75 and XO-4

On 8 Oct 2012 00:41, Gary Martin garycmar...@googlemail.com wrote: On 7 Oct 2012, at 23:56, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On 7 Oct 2012 23:17, Martin Langhoff mar...@laptop.org wrote: On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: #12082

Re: [Techteam] 13.1.0 devel build 5 released, for the XO-1, XO-1.5, XO-1.75 and XO-4

On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Chris Leonard cjlhomeaddr...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Gary Martin garycmar...@googlemail.com wrote: Are the layouts each in a distinct set of files? If so we could possibly split out layouts to standalone packages to make it easy to

Re: 13.1.0 devel build 5 released, for the XO-1, XO-1.5, XO-1.75 and XO-4

On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 12:36 AM, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: The ball? What ball? release. THIS IS A DEVELOPMENT RELEASE Users on XO-4 need to be aware of lots of limitations -- no suspend/resume

Re: 13.1.0 devel build 5 released, for the XO-1, XO-1.5, XO-1.75 and XO-4

On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 1:51 AM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 7:36 PM, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: The ball? What ball? release. THIS IS A DEVELOPMENT RELEASE

13.1.0 devel build 5 released, for the XO-1, XO-1.5, XO-1.75 and XO-4

The ball? What ball? release. THIS IS A DEVELOPMENT RELEASE Latest sugar builds GNOME 3.6 Fixed bugs: #12082 Maliit on-screen keyboard #12088 Browse died on XO-1 with SIGILL in 13.1.0 Activity changes: -Abacus-37 -Browse-141 +Abacus-39 +Browse-142 -Clock-9 +Clock-10 -ImageViewer-21

Re: [Techteam] 13.1.0 devel build 5 released, for the XO-1, XO-1.5, XO-1.75 and XO-4

On 7 Oct 2012 23:17, Martin Langhoff mar...@laptop.org wrote: On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: #12082 Maliit on-screen keyboard Yay!!! Is the evdev trickery all hooked up? Does ebook mode DTRT? Not yet, all the layouts are in and gtk2 works now

Re: qemu wine experiments on ARM

On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 5:22 AM, Martin Langhoff mar...@laptop.org wrote: Just a quick outline of one experiment to see if simple Win32 content-ware apps can be run. Commands may be missing switches, options and steps. Caveat reader. BYO smarts. On x87 host F17 - install livecd-tools

Re: [Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] Proposal: Contol-Panel packaging

On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 2:51 AM, Jerry Vonau jvo...@shaw.ca wrote: Hi All: I would like to propose a feature for discussion and inclusion in the 0.98 cycle is packaging all control-panel applets as rpms. As this discussion does not impact the UI and more of a packaging issue I'm an not

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >