On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 2:48 AM, Jon Nettleton jon.nettle...@gmail.comwrote:
Oh and there was a question about backwards compatibility. I know
there would be work testing it, but I see no problems with backward
compatibility. We would just have to check file types and adjust the
Hi all,
Am I missing something? It seems UBIFS doesn't go well with online updates.
[olpc@olpc-geode ~]$ sudo olpc-update 10.1.3_xo1-860
Downloading contents of build 10.1.3_xo1-860.
Updating to version hash 94bd3ffd71c4ec433dca2e0e162bcf33
Deleting old incomplete update tmp.J68VmD
Trying
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
On 21 January 2011 13:15, Tiago Marques tiago...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Am I missing something? It seems UBIFS doesn't go well with online
updates.
You forgot to say which version you are upgrading from.
Strange, I
Just installed, seems ok for such an early release. One problem has been
persisting since a few months back, which has to do with 50MB not being
enough to perform even a yum search, all on the standard repos. I get
usage near 65MB and I need to bump it up to around that so I don't get no
space
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 7:21 PM, Mikus Grinbergs mi...@bga.com wrote:
Downsides
- Increased SD card wear
For about two years now, I've been defining a swap partition on the
(external) permanent SD card I use with my XO-1 systems. So far, I
have never experienced any problems with that
AM, Tiago Marques tiago...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 7:21 PM, Mikus Grinbergs mi...@bga.com wrote:
Downsides
- Increased SD card wear
For about two years now, I've been defining a swap partition on the
(external) permanent SD card I use with my XO-1 systems. So far, I
That's strange, wherever I have used flash memory to serve as boot drive,
the kernel/userspace waits for the writes to be complete before powering
down. I have not experienced corruption that looks anything similar to
what's described. So the software is thinking it has written it but it
doesn't?
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 1:04 AM, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote:
Hi,
That's strange, wherever I have used flash memory to serve as
boot drive, the kernel/userspace waits for the writes to be
complete before powering down. I have not experienced corruption
that looks anything
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 2:11 AM, John Watlington w...@laptop.org wrote:
The symptoms you describe (power light and Mic light coming on, but nothing
else)
indicates that the main processor isn't executing any code. This is
usually caused
by one of two problems: corruption of the SPI ROM
I've constantly experienced the same issues. The XO-1 can't sometimes
connect to my AP and the signal is always very weak compared to all other
wireless devices I have - the XO 1.5 has a much stronger signal, for
instance.
It has always been this way and I have it almost for two years now,
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 8:33 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti ma...@marcopg.orgwrote:
On 8 Aug 2010, at 18:40, Tiago Marques tiago...@gmail.com wrote:
The idea of killing activities with the content closed seems ok but it
would probably be a good idea to have a way to opt out of it for some apps.
I'm
Have a look at the previous link I sent then. Counterfeiting may be your
problem.
Best regards,
Tiago
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 2:03 AM, Ed McNierney e...@laptop.org wrote:
Directly from the OEM or on the open market?
Both.
- Ed
___
Thanks for the update. Can you disclose the brands of the mentioned SD
cards?
It's always useful to know what not to buy.
I'm assuming none of these cards don't have static wear levelling. Did any
manufacturer provide you details on that or are they only using spare blocks
for repairability?
Any
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:29 PM, Ed McNierney e...@laptop.org wrote:
On Aug 19, 2010, at 4:21 PM, John Watlington wrote:
Thanks for the update. Can you disclose the brands of the mentioned SD
cards?
It's always useful to know what not to buy.
I probably could, but variations between
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:21 PM, John Watlington w...@laptop.org wrote:
On Aug 19, 2010, at 1:59 PM, Tiago Marques wrote:
Thanks for the update. Can you disclose the brands of the mentioned SD
cards?
It's always useful to know what not to buy.
I probably could, but variations between
, it should
not try to again for the session, or at least for a very large increase in
query time.
Apps like instant messaging(though I don't recall one for Sugar), would
definitely need a definitive opt out, no?
Best regards,
Tiago
Regards,
Tomeu
Best regards,
Tiago Marques
This, however
that doesn't exist here. I understand your engineering constraints on
the hardware but randomly killing activities is poised to confuse users and
cause people considering the hardware for deployment to think that you're
selling them something defective/baddly manufactured.
Best regards,
Tiago
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:50 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
Hi,
On the XO HS (highschool edition, the one with a more normal
keyboard) we're facing some questions about how the F keys should
function, under sugar and GNOME.
The technicalities are in
Perhaps some kernel update caused problems with the ethernet driver?
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Mikus Grinbergs mi...@bga.com wrote:
Disclaimer: I am not asking for help; I am sharing my experiences.
I notice that with os206, ethernet data transfers into the XO-1.5 are
running at 2/3
For me the one window per directory is pretty annoying, so I would say to go
for that browser mode.
Best regards,
Tiago
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
Hi,
In Peru, they are customizing their GNOME build in that they are
setting Nautilus to browser mode
Hi all,
Renaming this thread to see if I can get the message through. Message below.
Best regards,
Tiago
-- Forwarded message --
From: Tiago Marques tiago...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 3:13 PM
Subject: Re: F11-for-XO1.5 Release 10.1.1 Release Candidate 4- Hardware
issue
Massive kudos for everything :)
Keep up the great work and keep us up to date on those ARM developments.
Best regards,
Tiago
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 11:01 PM, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote:
Hi,
Now that the 10.1.1 release for XO-1.5 is out, it's a good time to
talk about OLPC's software
I agree with you completely.
This is bad, it's just not complete TiVoization:
If you insert a USB flash drive or SD card, the boot firmware will only
boot from it if the files are tested and cryptographically signed by OLPC.
What stops one person of then adding root access again?
This will
Hi all,
My XO-1.5 B2 just entered this state last night. The only difference is that
I was using it, writing e-mail, and then it rebooted itself. After that it
would no longer boot so I tried to run memtest. It crashed on the second
test with a random character on the right side of the screen and
-- Forwarded message --
From: Tiago Marques tiago...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 2:08 PM
Subject: Re: XO-1.5 HS version announced
To: Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com
I feel it may be a tough sell against classmates, since the XO has so many
times been hammered
Hi,
Will you be keeping that arrow key arrangement or is it still a prototype?
Best regards,
Tiago
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 7:41 AM, John Watlington w...@laptop.org wrote:
As usual, by a random news outlet:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/10309116.stm
These laptops are the XO-1.5
From previous e-mails I know there were some challenges fitting the default
layout but I'm still kind of surprised that it's become final.
Best of luck with deployments and do give some feedback from deployments if
possible. I personally wouldn't look twice at a laptop with a keyboard like
that
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 2:23 PM, John Watlington w...@laptop.org wrote:
On Jun 8, 2010, at 9:03 AM, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
Thanks for inviting discussion!
I recently started testing Etoys on the Apple iPad - not the least to get
an idea of what needs to be done to it for an XO tablet.
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
On 7 June 2010 20:05, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
You are placing far more trust in a trivial rebuild than I would. Once
Fedora ceases testing the actual instruction streams we will be using,
we will be
Ups, I missed the last part.
As you say, leaving CFLAGS intact will probably make -i586 problem free.
Tiago
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 11:38 PM, Tiago Marques tiago...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
On 7 June 2010 20:05, James Cameron qu
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 11:12 PM, Jon Nettleton jon.nettle...@gmail.comwrote:
2) FESCo (Fedora Engineering Steering Committee) is dealing with the
issue upstream [1][2] in Fedora with the view of getting it fixed
upstream for F-14 or at the very least clarified. It was agreed in
F-12 that
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 7:02 AM, John Gilmore g...@toad.com wrote:
There's a long standing hard bug of non-accelerated video on Linux
(not just XO). That hurts hurts HURTS any Linux device. There is some
backstory on that -- it's whether to use Xv or not, whether the video
frames can be
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
A mountain of packages and their corresponding effects on the system,
...
It also invalidates many processes that myself and others have been
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 10:19 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
In another thread, we've been discussing the issue that Fedora 12
changed base architecture from i586 to i686. The XO-1 processor (Geode
LX) is a i586. Fedora 12 seems to run OK (although I suspect there
will be a few broken
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 12:47 AM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 05:33:07PM +0100, Tiago Marques wrote:
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 7:37 AM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 05:24:00PM +, Tiago Marques wrote:
I was just
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 7:37 AM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 05:24:00PM +, Tiago Marques wrote:
I was just looking into this and the issue with SD cards' random write
performance intrigued me in this particular case. Isn't recording
being performed
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 2:37 AM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
I've no explanation for this behaviour.
Do we still have some (sugar?) log files opened 'sync'? ext3/4 still
'fsync' the whole partition,
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 12:38 AM, Paul Fox p...@laptop.org wrote:
martin wrote:
Running powertop on your machine is hugely informational once you've
read the powertop website docs.
re: powertop -- with silbe's help our battery driver now provides
enough of the expected properties
-- Forwarded message --
From: Tiago Marques tiago...@gmail.com
Date: Sat, May 8, 2010 at 12:17 PM
Subject: Re: XO 1.5 frequency scaling
To: Richard A. Smith rich...@laptop.org
Hi Richard,
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 12:28 AM, Richard A. Smith rich...@laptop.orgwrote:
On 05/04/2010
you're right. there's nothing in powerd related to clocking. powerd
limits itself to managing the display, wlan on/off, and system suspend.
Seemed so, thanks.
Did I miss some firmware or kernel update, as I can't load the c7
powersaver
kernel module in a kernel I built myself.
are
Hi,
I was just looking into this and the issue with SD cards' random write
performance intrigued me in this particular case.
Isn't recording being performed sequentially, hence no lag problem? At
least, it should be somewhat mitigated, filesystem might be causing
problems?
Anyhow, I have been
Hi Martin,
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 7:41 PM, Tiago Marques tiago...@gmail.com wrote:
I have been wondering for some time how are you controlling the frequency
of
the C7 processor in Fedora. Is this being done
Hi all,
I have been wondering for some time how are you controlling the frequency of
the C7 processor in Fedora. Is this being done in the background by
openfirmware or some other place where it is not visible. I would like to
test it's effect on battery life and to know if power management needs
I must ask, what's the default behavior of function keys in the new layout?
Fn changes them to F keys, or are they F keys without Fn pressed?
Tiago
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Mikus Grinbergs mi...@bga.com wrote:
The following are the keyboard layouts and legends for these
new
:44:23 EDT 2010 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
Which should be what you expect.
Best regards,
Tiago
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:24 PM, Paul Fox p...@laptop.org wrote:
martin wrote:
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Tiago Marques tiago...@gmail.com
wrote:
Tap to click is still working for me
with the regular placement of keys.
Best regads,
Tiago
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 5:15 PM, Tiago Marques tiago...@gmail.com wrote:
I must ask, what's the default behavior of function keys in the new layout?
Fn changes them to F keys, or are they F keys without Fn pressed?
Tiago
On Wed, Apr 28
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Paul Fox p...@laptop.org wrote:
tiago wrote:
I must ask, what's the default behavior of function keys in the new
layout?
Fn changes them to F keys, or are they F keys without Fn pressed?
the labels on the function keys are just alternate meanings, not
maybe i'm misunderstanding you, but i think i didn't do a good
job up above. the 4 keys used by sugar for network, friends,
home, and activity _are_ F1 through F4. those keys have never
been special, and they're not special on the new keyboard. all
that's changed on the new keyboard is
Looks great, especially as the dot buttons are now more readable, while
the F keys can still be quickly identified anyway.
Best regards,
Tiago
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.comwrote:
As per Tiago's suggestion, I made a version (so far only for the .es
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 6:02 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
bmsch...@fas.harvard.edu wrote:
On Wed, 28 Apr 2010, Walter Bender wrote:
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Tiago Marques tiago...@gmail.com
wrote:
I was just looking at the layout again and just noticed the new arrow
keys
placement
Hi Chris,
Tap to click is still working for me after using olpc-upgrade.
Best regards,
Tiago
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 10:06 PM, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote:
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_1.5
http://build.laptop.org/10.2.0/os121
Compressed image size: 678.38mb (+0.04mb since build
your drive
work on an XO-1? do you have power consumption specs for your drive?
paul
Best regards,
Tiago
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 7:42 PM, Sameer Verma sve...@sfsu.edu wrote:
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Tiago Marques tiago...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all,
I've ran
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 11:21 PM, Paul Fox p...@laptop.org wrote:
tiago wrote:
Hi all,
Just tested the new build and the sound widget is not updating the sound
level when using the volume keys. Pressing the widget shows the slider,
which is set accordingly. This did work in
Just checked and this is exactly the same behavior of the XO-1.
Best regards
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Tiago Marques tiago...@gmail.com wrote:
It's an Iomega 160GB, which has a seagate drive inside, not sure which one.
http://www.iomega.com/about/prreleases/2008
Opened as http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/10133
Tiago
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Tiago Marques tiago...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 11:21 PM, Paul Fox p...@laptop.org wrote:
tiago wrote:
Hi all,
Just tested the new build and the sound widget is not updating
Hi all,
Just tested the new build and the sound widget is not updating the sound
level when using the volume keys. Pressing the widget shows the slider,
which is set accordingly. This did work in previous versions, not sure which
ones.
Everything else seems ok.
Best regards,
Tiago
On Thu, Apr
Hi all,
Unsure if this was a side effect of cost cutting or improper calibration,
I'm reporting some differences I found between the camera in both models and
hope this information is of some use:
- XO 1 has slower response time in the video being shown.
- XO 1 has a much brighter picture,
Hi Chris
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote:
Hi Tiago,
You don't mention which build you're using, and it's important because
we're still making many changes to the camera setup, so please do that
in future.
Sorry about that, it's the latest versions:
XO 1
Hi all,
I've ran into something on the 1.5 B2 I have here, which I'm in doubt if may
or may not be relevant for OLPC's hardware people(it seems not), so I'm
reporting it anyway.
All three USB ports can deliver enough power to an USB 2.5 HDD, no problem.
They cannot in the following conditions:
I forgot to mention that's not my case since even if I plug the two USB ends
it still can't power up.
Best regards,
Tiago
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 7:42 PM, Sameer Verma sve...@sfsu.edu wrote:
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Tiago Marques tiago...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I've ran
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 8:54 PM, John Watlington w...@laptop.org wrote:
On Apr 19, 2010, at 8:51 PM, Tiago Marques wrote:
Hi John,
I'm trying out some new USB Flash drives from Sony that are quite
fast(random write speed) compared to the SD cards shipping in the XO 1.5 and
I'd just
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 2:27 AM, John Watlington w...@laptop.org wrote:
On Apr 20, 2010, at 8:30 PM, Tiago Marques wrote:
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 8:54 PM, John Watlington w...@laptop.org wrote:
On Apr 19, 2010, at 8:51 PM, Tiago Marques wrote:
Hi John,
I'm trying out some new
I still have this same issue with my 1.5 B2, which I reported to the list a
while back. The pointer moves without touching the surface, although the
distance is more like 2mm than half an inch for me. It's still annoying most
of the time but one can live with it.
Tiago
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at
Hi all,
The Xv support recently introduced seems to be working well. The rest of the
system seems to be doing fine like for the most recent builds.
Anything else worth some extra testing for QA?
Best regards,
Tiago
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 9:18 PM, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote:
That between XOs 1 1.5? I only have one 1.5 to test with.
Or should I use a virtual machine to test os116?
Best regards,
Tiago
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:14 PM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 09:36:19PM +0100, Tiago Marques wrote:
The Xv support recently
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 1:26 AM, Carlos Nazareno object...@gmail.comwrote:
Oh dear. Googling HQTube ended up with the top 2 entries being porn
sites :-/ I think something needs a project name change :)
Indeed, hence the link in my e-mail, to avoid confusion.
Anyway, wouldn't there be a
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 2:05 AM, Mikus Grinbergs mi...@bga.com wrote:
I can tell you that youtube is well within reach of both the XO-1 and
1.5,
currently (or at least up to build 114), it was running better and faster
on
the XO-1 rather than on the XO 1.5 due to the presence of Xv
Thanks Ben,
That is a big problem. Or is OLPC allowed to ship codecs without issues?
Best regards,
Tiago
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 8:24 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
bmsch...@fas.harvard.edu wrote:
Tiago Marques wrote:
I don't think H.264 needs licensed codecs but I'm not sure on that.
H.264
Hi all,
I can tell you that youtube is well within reach of both the XO-1 and 1.5,
currently(or at least up to build 114), it was running better and faster on
the XO-1 rather than on the XO 1.5 due to the presence of Xv support. The
problem is that I can only have decent performance by not using
Hi Carlos,
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 12:42 AM, Carlos Nazareno object...@gmail.comwrote:
I don't get it.
1) Flash is no more evil as Java was years ago when it was closed
source and it was being taught at universities.
There is now an open-source SDK (Flex SDK (there's 2 versions, the
Thanks. The connector for the WLAN card did seem a mini-PCIe but I thought
you were going to stick with SDIO.
Best regards,
Tiago
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 10:10 PM, John Watlington w...@laptop.org wrote:
On Mar 7, 2010, at 10:24 PM, Tiago Marques wrote:
Hi Wad,
Been reading some lost e
Hmm... interesting. Thanks. I'll see if I can do that in olpc-update and
send some patches to see if it can be integrated.
Best regards,
Tiago
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 9:27 PM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 06:24:39PM +, Tiago Marques wrote:
No easy way
...@laptop.org wrote:
On Mar 9, 2010, at 11:22 AM, Tiago Marques wrote:
Thanks. The connector for the WLAN card did seem a mini-PCIe but I thought
you were going to stick with SDIO.
We did. Don't confuse a connector with the bus used
with it. Many WLAN cards these days use a miniPCIe
connector
, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 04:52:28AM +, Tiago Marques wrote:
I don't know what olpc-update is doing in the backstage, is it restoring
a
pre-defined database or diffs?
It is rsync'ing a filesystem tree from updates.laptop.org to your
laptop
Using olpc-update is failing on me, from 108:
@ERROR: unknown module 'build-10.2_xo1.5-111': Command
'['/usr/bin/fakeroot', '-i',
'/home/upserv/builds/build-10.2_xo1.5-1...@5t8aaq/fakeroot.state', '-s',
'/home/upserv/builds/build-10.2_xo1.5-1...@5t8aaq/fakeroot.state', '--',
'python2.5', '-c',
Hi Chris,
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 1:23 AM, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote:
Hi Tiago,
Using olpc-update is failing on me, from 108:
Could you try again? Think I fixed it, but not sure.
Seems ok, is performing incremental rsync right now. Thanks!
One other thing I wanted to ask but
Hi Wad,
Been reading some lost e-mails, sorry to be bumping this up.
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 10:35 PM, John Watlington w...@laptop.org wrote:
On Jan 27, 2010, at 12:17 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
hi scott, thanks for joining in, here.
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 3:01 PM, C.
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 3:40 AM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 01:45:30AM +, Tiago Marques wrote:
One other thing I wanted to ask but keep forgetting. Is it possible to
do these incremental updates but keep the packages I installed by hand
somehow
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 4:01 AM, Paul Fox p...@laptop.org wrote:
james wrote:
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 01:45:30AM +, Tiago Marques wrote:
One other thing I wanted to ask but keep forgetting. Is it possible to
do these incremental updates but keep the packages I installed by hand
The very long time is hard to get rid of, at least on the XO 1. As far
as I can tell, the biggest problem is that ALT-TAB cycles through the
apps by the order they were open and not in the order by which they
were last accessed(which is non standard behaviour nowadays) and which
causes problems
Indeed, it would probably also be a good addition!
Best regards,
Tiago
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Sascha Silbe
sascha-ml-sugar-olpc-de...@silbe.org wrote:
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 06:07:56PM +, Tiago Marques wrote:
The very long time is hard to get rid of, at least on the XO 1. As far
Perhaps a 2GHz quad-core? ARM Cortex-A9 is already dual core and up to 2GHz.
Best regards
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Rafael Enrique Ortiz Guerrero
dir...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All.
8-ghz processor ?.
Rafael Ortiz
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 4:23 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
Hi all,
In an effort to migrate testing to a machine that resembles something
like the C1, I would like to perform the WLAN ECO(s) on the B2 1.5.
However, I found one for the B2 models and another for the B3:
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/XO1.5_WLAN_SR_ECO
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 5:01 AM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 04:26:52AM +, Tiago Marques wrote:
One question, leaving it idling will leave always suspended, right?
Yes.
Is there any kind of program that can wakeup the laptop from time to
time when it's
I have disabled suspend due to the wireless thing with B2s and haven't
had time to do the ECO fix. Will leave it idling tonight and a fews
days with suspend on to see what gives.
Best regards,
Tiago
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 11:19 PM, John Watlington w...@laptop.org wrote:
Saw the IRC log from
its sleep in a timed fashion?
Best regards,
Tiago
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 4:16 AM, Tiago Marques tiago...@gmail.com wrote:
I have disabled suspend due to the wireless thing with B2s and haven't
had time to do the ECO fix. Will leave it idling tonight and a fews
days with suspend on to see
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 2:00 AM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 06:56:58PM +, Tiago Marques wrote:
I went to the wiki yesterday and found the information that the
LiFePO4 batteries have 2 or 4 cells, rated at 22Watt hours. Is this
rating the same or is it half
-- Forwarded message --
From: Tiago Marques tiago...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 3:20 PM
Subject: Re: side/side batt. life in suspend
To: Richard A. Smith rich...@laptop.org
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 5:16 AM, Richard A. Smith rich...@laptop.org wrote:
On 12/06/2009 09:00 PM
I see. Thanks for your input.
Best regards,
Tiago
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Richard A. Smith rich...@laptop.org wrote:
On 12/07/2009 10:20 AM, Tiago Marques wrote:
I see. So when OEMs quote a number, it's not something exactly accurate
also?
Depends on how they measured it. Some
These are excellent news!
How many cells do current shipping batteries have?(out of curiosity)
Best regards,
Tiago Marques
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 8:08 PM, John Watlington w...@laptop.org wrote:
The second test was similar:
XO-1: 9h 5m
XO-1.5: 12h 40m
On Dec 3, 2009, at 11:52 AM, John
information should also go in the wiki?
Best regards,
Tiago Marques
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Tiago Marques tiago...@gmail.com wrote:
These are excellent news!
How many cells do current shipping batteries have?(out
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 4:07 PM, John Watlington w...@laptop.org wrote:
On Nov 29, 2009, at 1:21 PM, Tiago Marques wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote:
Hi,
You can also disable it using My Settings - Power - Automatic
power management.
(Cool, I
By the way, powertop was indeed showing it spending almost all cpu time in C4.
Best regards
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Tiago Marques tiago...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 4:07 PM, John Watlington w...@laptop.org wrote:
On Nov 29, 2009, at 1:21 PM, Tiago Marques wrote
Thanks, I'm aware of that. For this particular card it is either
defective or the XO is causing errors since it is barely 3 months old
and hasn't seen much use. It is gathering a good amount of errors by
writing 1-2GiB randomly, so I hope I don't need to go as far as
writing almost 1TiB before I
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Mikus Grinbergs mi...@bga.com wrote:
Have you directed OpenFirmware to write to this filesystem since it was
created with mke2fs?
I'm not sure of what you are thinking about. The only time I
explicitly ask OFW to write anything is to the internal SD card,
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 9:06 AM, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 5:00 AM, Mikus Grinbergs mi...@bga.com wrote:
me, or the hardware, or the software -- but I've had to run 'fsck'
several times this November on my XO-1.5's SD card -- because of
Hi Richard,
Thanks, I'll have a go at them and report back.
Best regards,
Tiago
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 6:31 AM, Richard A. Smith rich...@laptop.org wrote:
Can you provide me with the software or scripts you use to do your
internal SD card testing? I would love to put this card and the other
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 8:34 AM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
On 28/11/2009, at 11:18 AM, Tiago Marques wrote:
Well... it seems VIA has people working on 3D support but no one seems
to want to review the code...
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name
Hi Daniel,
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
2009/11/28 Tiago Marques tiago...@gmail.com:
Well... it seems VIA has people working on 3D support but no one seems
to want to review the code...
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name
Ok... my bad.
I'm all for the GPL'd driver but if they could provide a working
driver in the mean time, the better. The best Linux 3D driver out
there is Nvidia's one, which is a blob but works. Intel has been
putting some efforts into the open source driver but it is nothing
more than a disaster
1 - 100 of 182 matches
Mail list logo
