On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 11:17 AM, Frank Ch. Eigler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Note there are USB display adapters (I have one in my hand as I write
this); I'd love to see someone working on X.org drivers for it. [...]
The sisusb-based USB display adapters
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 8:27 AM, Bert Freudenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did you try the binaries?
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Remote_display#Binaries
Ah, well, I guess someone has been working on this since the last time
I looked at it ;-)
--Tom
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 4:24 PM, Joshua N Pritikin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe
we MUST error on the conservative side, especially for American
deployments.
If you're sending home user modifiable wifi-capable computers with
kids, you're already a long way from the conservative side of
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 9:44 AM, Aaron Konstam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is fine except for one thing. Running Sugar on top of proprietary
software means that sugar developers who have to deal with problems in
the interface between XP , let us say, and sugar will have to know alot
more
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Edward Cherlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 1:27 AM, Torello Querci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If is possible to use normal windows application on top Sugar+Windows the
educational project is broken because the developers what need to
, Dan Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 12:01 -0500, Tom Hoffman wrote:
Thanks Dan. I'll give this a shot.
No problem, does the usb2vga stuff give you a Makefile at all? If so,
could you attach it?
If not, it's pretty easy to make one, assuming that the module doesn't
