Message: 1
Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2020 11:41:33 + (UTC)
From: Yioryos Asprobounitis
To: "devel@lists.laptop.org"
Subject: XO1.75
Message-ID: <2133017554.128519.1591443693...@mail.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Hi list
I dug out my XOs to check their conditio
Hi list
I dug out my XOs to check their condition and my XO-1.75 (SKU203) refuses to
boot as if it was wiped out clean or has no microSD card at all.
The screen comes up and nothing further.
Firmware check just show a double zero [00]
Trying to install a fresh OS from USB fails (with the same
To check, make sure the laptop is unlocked, and add this to the second
line of the boot/olpc.fth file:
dev /sd patch 2drop cb! sdhci-card-power-off dend
Does this keep the SD slot powered only when is occupied or regardless?
Does the OS takes over the SD slot power management
It is nice to see a new build for all the XOs after some time now.
Tried 41001qq at the ends of the spectrum my G1G1 XO-1 and a touch XO-4
Both worked and I even got them to collaborate on measure activity
On the XO-4 things are really nice and with the SMP kernel things are moving
reasonably
Nice to see the list back up and running.
According to the info XO4 firmware q7c04 support(s) booting legacy android
kernel
However both os32013a4 and 3214a4 fail to boot under q7c04.
Do they qualify as legacy android kernel?
BTW is there any official or community SMP android/sugar builds in the
Chrome is failing to enforce minimum font size in various sites (try
github as an example) making browsing unpleasant. Not sure if this
is a chrome or a build bug but other browsers work fine (Boat look
the best). The previous browser was also better on that front.
I've just tested Chrome on
- Chrome as default browser,
Chrome is failing to enforce minimum font size in various sites (try github as
an example) making browsing unpleasant. Not sure if this is a chrome or a build
bug but other browsers work fine (Boat look the best). The previous browser was
also better on
If a picture is a thousand words, what about a video [1] or [2]
Some real magic after 22 sec ;-)
XO-4 touch, build 32013a4/2014-04-07, firmware q7b38, Android 4.3.1, app:
Multitouch Vis Test
[1] https://flic.kr/p/n3KFa2
[2] http://tinypic.com/r/2ed74ab/8
If a picture is a thousand words, what about a video [1] or [2]?
Thanks for testing. I hope this will be useful to our developer.
What is the SKU? Check label underneath battery, or type .mfg-data at
ok prompt and read tag sk.
306
What is the touchscreen firmware version? See
I could not find Settings, Developer options but I did find Settings,
System, Accessibility, Magnification gestures which by default is off.
Turning it on enabled pan and zoom.
Not sure but it seems that you need to tripletap first and then pan
and zoom are available, pan seems to
Actually zoom, pinch, triple tap etc all work without turning
magnification gestures on.
Not for me. No zooming until I turn on magnification gestures and
triple tap. I am testing on the home screen and browser.
I cannot start google maps because I have the 8686 wifi module. Maybe
This is a disturbingly nice build!
When video recording will also work will be great.
Tested bluetooth connection to an iMac with no issues (file transfers)
It would be nice if the screen rotation button could be used to block screen
rotation.
An Android 4.3.1 (Jelly Bean) build for the
This is to announce the FatDogARM beta-1, a desktop-style OS for ARM machines,
for the XO-4 and XO-1.75.
In contrast to the alpha versions, beta versions are a complete rebuild and are
optimized for ARMv7 with vfp3-d16. Thus will run equally well on both the XO-4
and the XO-1.75.
The OS is
An Android 4.3.1 (Jelly Bean) build for the XO-4 laptop.
OLPC is preparing an Android, Sugar and Gnome dual-boot system for the
XO-4.
Our next development release of a dual boot build is available.
The build is based on our arm-3.5 kernel, with changes which can be
found in the
For people who want to try your build, you have made it harder for
them, for (in my opinion) no good reason.
Here is a script that will download FatDog-ARM Linux for the XO-4 (if not
already downloaded) and install it along side the Fedora build in the internal
storage as an alt-boot,
3. external media such as SD card and USB drives are not always
available, but internal media is always available,
That is also why we do not provide zd images that would be easier to
install. People that want it in the internal eMMC should know how
to do it too ;)
For people
Does not boot if the files are unpacked onto internal eMMC and no
external SD card is present. Workaround: edit olpc.fth to ensure
mmcblk0 is used regardless.
Thanks for the suggestion.
However, we do not want to affect the original XO OS.
That is also why we do not provide zd images that
James [1] and I are happy to announce the release 1.0 of FatDog-ARM Linux [2]
for the XO-4 laptops.
Version 1.0 Is a fully functional XO-4 OS and development environment.
Download from [3]
Further information in [4]
[1] http://jamesbond3142.no-ip.org/blog/
[2]
This is the first development release of fatdog-arm linux [1] for the XO-ARM
laptops.
It is intended for development/debugging and at 300MB contains all the
development tools and headers. Additional packages are available from the repo
through slapt-get/gslapt.
Development goes on in fatdog-arm
Is the XO version/model info somewhere in /sys for the ARM XOs as it is for the
x86 XOs (in /sys/class/dmi/id/)?
Thx
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
By proposing that further development work be native to Android,
you are locking the fruits of that labor away from:
- Any child using a current XO laptop
- Any child using any other Linux laptop, such as the millions of children in
Brazil, Venezuela, Argentina, etc...
- Any child
Paul wrote:
UI software and integration was by an OLPC-funded team, which
until recently was completely separate from the laptop development
team.
ie, now is not?
yes, now not separate.
If not, which way the tablet/laptop development team is heading?
don't know, sorry.
On Aug 13, 2013, at 1:09 PM, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote:
Paul wrote:
If not, which way the tablet/laptop development team is heading?
don't know, sorry.
OK, thanks.
Hopefully someone that does will care to comment.
It is lack of accurate knowledge of the future, not caring
UI software and integration
was by an OLPC-funded team, which until recently was completely
separate from the laptop development team.
ie, now is not?
If not, which way the tablet/laptop development team is heading?
paul
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
Is in shell.log file
OK thanks.
Unfortunately this entry is not created when activities are launched by
sugar-launch.
Any line of code that could mend this?
Gonzalo
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Yioryos Asprobounitis mavrot...@yahoo.com
wrote:
Metodology:
* Changed
Metodology:
* Changed SUGAR_LOGGER_DEVEL
* The activities were started from the listview, then are new instances
* The start up time is the time reported by sugar in the log.
Looked throughout $HOME/.sugar/default and could not find the launched in
time reported anywere
Could you please
- Original Message -
From: James Cameron qu...@laptop.org
To: Yioryos Asprobounitis mavrot...@yahoo.com
Cc: OLPC Devel devel@lists.laptop.org
Sent: Thursday, July 4, 2013 8:44 AM
Subject: Re: XO-1(.75)
On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 10:02:15PM -0700, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote
So, having someone generate activity startup time numbers in a fair
test (i.e. same platform, different software versions) would be of
value.
Tried the following little script but I can not find a way to get the output of
'time' command to the output.txt file.
Any suggestions?
#!/bin/bash
The following script appears to work as expected, but is the result valid?
That's hard to judge without having an explanation for what you are
trying to measure. I can't immediately see your intentions from
reading the script.
Daniel
My intention is to get a list of the user and
I'm using the XO-1.75 a bit more these days and gives me a sense of XO-1
performance wise.
So I compared my (500/200 overclocked) XO-1 running F14/os885/Sugar-0.94 to
XO-1.75 running F-18/13.2.0-11/Sugar-0.98.
XO-1.75 was significantly faster to boot (~20sec).
However, XO-1 was faster (to open)
- Original Message -
From: James Cameron qu...@laptop.org
To: Yioryos Asprobounitis mavrot...@yahoo.com
Cc: OLPC Devel devel@lists.laptop.org
Sent: Thursday, July 4, 2013 2:10 AM
Subject: Re: XO-1(.75)
On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 02:21:08PM -0700, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote:
I'm
I agree. I've found laptops with looser-than-i-would-like hinge and
motherboard screws after children have been using them. The hinge
screws that are uncovered by disassembly were the most interesting.
There was a problem with the manufacturing process which
resulted in some of the
I do not know for how long the toasted [1] XO-1.5 boards worked but my oven
baked [2] board died again after 8 months of daily use and a guestimated 400+
hours.
I do not know if this is long enough to justify the process (roughly half a
school year worth, I would guess), but I thought to record
- Original Message -
From: James Cameron qu...@laptop.org
To: Yioryos Asprobounitis mavrot...@yahoo.com
Cc: OLPC Devel devel@lists.laptop.org
Sent: Monday, July 1, 2013 11:02 AM
Subject: Re: resurrected XO-1.5, died again
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 12:53:47AM -0700, Yioryos
- Original Message -
The crash in X is certainly worth a ticket.
http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/12717
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
- Original Message -
From: Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org
To: Yioryos Asprobounitis mavrot...@yahoo.com
Cc: OLPC Devel devel@lists.laptop.org
Sent: Monday, July 1, 2013 7:38 PM
Subject: Re: GNOME on XO-1.75
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 1:55 AM, Yioryos Asprobounitis
mavrot...@yahoo.com
The 3.0 and 3.5 olpc ARM karnels do have any squashfs support.
Could be activated as for the x86 kernels.
We are trying to get an pan-XO Tinycore linux build that can be put in a stick
and allow booting and customization of any XO model (like the now depreciated
customization stick [1]).
OLPC kernels do *not* support NTFS (# CONFIG_NTFS_FS is not set).
It either should be activated in future builds or use another FS.
I believe tha FAT32 (VFAT) can handle big drives and is universal.
However it has a number of other problems that may not suit your needs
(reliability, permissions
I'm trying to cycle the power of the wifi card on the XO-1{.5] but after half
an hour of fruitless searching of the list/wiki/web I thought to ask, since I
remember being discussed here.
Could please someone points to the terminal commands to turn off and on power
on the usb8388 and sd8686
On the XO-1 olpc-update failed on 2 consecutive attempts with different
manifest error each time.
In both case when was getting tight on disk space.
The update requires significant free space (more than 250MB) and time (more
than 2 hours).
Maybe olpc-update from 13.1.0 to 13.2.0 is
As far as I can see fedora-18 uses gcc-4.7.3. From what I understand (and
tested, though with gcc-4.7.1) with gcc-4.7.x, 2.6.35 kernel compilation fails
because of a asmregparm call in ptrace.h, .
I was wondering if the olpc-2.6.35 kernel source should be patched with this
patch:
I can understand is not a priority right now but I ventured a bit on the GNOME
side of os9. Is considerably improved!
A couple of issues on the XO-1.75. Abiword exits with the cryptic Aborted.
Switching back to Sugar (or restarting X) takes a good 30 seconds after the
gnome panel has exited,
Updated an XO-1 and an XO-1.75 from os7 to os9 and would appear that the first
reboot software update still has some issues.
When the process is initiated as prompted at the 1st boot post-update, the
progress bar stops after the first or second activity, and looks like froze
though the process
--- On Tue, 11/6/12, fors...@ozonline.com.au fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote:
sounds like http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/12272
Yes. That's the one.
Sorry for the repetition. I guess missed it.
Updated an XO-1 and an XO-1.75 from os7 to os9 and
would appear that the first reboot software
I'm trying to use ffmpeg/ffplay (version 0.6.3-rpmfusion) on os885 to make a
simple app for camera recording/viewing on XO-1.5.
The problem I have is that only the first or a couple of initial frames are
showing/recorded and then it freezes there.
With ffplay -loglevel 7, kernel shows:
[
. Not even ffplay or the application.
So is just an ffmpeg/ffplay issue.
Thus the request for any experience on the subject (ffmpeg/XO)
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 02:36:54AM -0700, Yioryos
Asprobounitis wrote:
I'm trying to use ffmpeg/ffplay (version
0.6.3-rpmfusion) on os885 to make a simple app
--- On Wed, 10/17/12, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
I wouldn't warm my sandwich in them, for the reasons
described here.
But damn it's tempting.
Go for it :-P
You are probably safe (or to be more precise, is not going to make it much
worse) :-o
Till the 80s (how old
Devel devel@lists.laptop.org, Yioryos Asprobounitis
mavrot...@yahoo.com
Date: Tuesday, October 16, 2012, 12:59 AM
I've given multiple machines to anna
to 'bake'. Alas, it is my feedback that In general,
they've ressurrected but only for a short period of
time. I am unaware of a long term
--- On Mon, 10/15/12, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
From: James Cameron qu...@laptop.org
Subject: Re: XO-1.5's sudden death
To: Yioryos Asprobounitis mavrot...@yahoo.com
Cc: OLPC Devel devel@lists.laptop.org
Date: Monday, October 15, 2012, 2:39 AM
Yes, I know it so well known that I
--- On Mon, 10/15/12, Chris Leonard cjlhomeaddr...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Chris Leonard cjlhomeaddr...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: XO-1.5's sudden death - oven resurrected!
To: James Cameron qu...@laptop.org, Yioryos Asprobounitis
mavrot...@yahoo.com, OLPC Devel devel@lists.laptop.org
Date
--- On Tue, 10/16/12, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
From: James Cameron qu...@laptop.org
Subject: Re: XO-1.5's sudden death - oven resurrected!
To: Yioryos Asprobounitis mavrot...@yahoo.com
Cc: OLPC Devel devel@lists.laptop.org, Chris Leonard
cjlhomeaddr...@gmail.com
Date: Tuesday
My XO-1.5 that I use daily appears dead this morning. :-(
Was working trouble free till last night (os885).
Powered off normally and this morning when powering up the power light comes
up green, the screen flashes momentarily (screen lights OK I assume) and then
nothing.
No screen, no chime.
--- On Sat, 10/13/12, Mikus Grinbergs mi...@bga.com wrote:
From: Mikus Grinbergs mi...@bga.com
Subject: [support-gang] Regarding temporary pauses, perhaps due to using an
SD card with an XO
To: Community Support Volunteers -- who help respond to help AT
laptop.org
The Fly away Peter, fly away Paul release.
THIS IS A DEVELOPMENT RELEASE
This is the first release adding support for the XO-4
I do not have an XO-4 but I tried 31004 on XO-1 and XO-1.75 and besides some, I
assume Gtk3 related, sugar issues present in both machines, there are some
--- On Mon, 10/1/12, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote:
From: Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org
Subject: Re: F18/os4 on XO-1 [Devel Digest, Vol 79, Issue 37]
To: Yioryos Asprobounitis mavrot...@yahoo.com
Cc: devel@lists.laptop.org
Date: Monday, October 1, 2012, 12:10 AM
I do not have
--- On Sun, 7/22/12, Richard A. Smith rich...@laptop.org wrote:
Actually I believe it is worth the trouble because there is
never just a single problem that doesn't happen to another
machine. If you have this failure then there are
probably many more. Its just never been reported.
I'm
--- On Thu, 7/19/12, Richard Smith rich...@laptop.org wrote:
- Boot the XO. Sugar or OFW either will work.
- Run on battery and allow the battery to discharge
until is
says its 90%
- Connect power and let the battery charge to
full.
- Reboot XO and stop at OFW.
- ok batman-start
--- On Sat, 7/21/12, Richard A. Smith rich...@laptop.org wrote:
Yes and I'll continue to say it as long as you continue to
do things
that are invalid and will produce nonsensical results.
I've told you a
few times that when you run commands like bg-acr! that you
are modifying
important
--- On Wed, 7/18/12, Richard Smith rich...@laptop.org wrote:
- Start with the XO in a clean working condition. ie remove
all power
and battery.
- Boot the XO. Sugar or OFW either will work.
- Run on battery and allow the battery to discharge until is
says its 90%
- Connect power and
In a *non* olpc/fedora XO-1 build, liberates consistently fails to find the
usb8xxx firmware after suspend/resume (error -2) though on boot, re-boot has no
problem.
This does not appear to be a powered issue, and does not happen with the
libertas-sdio of XO-1.5 (with identical user-space)
I think you do not give enough credit to the work being done
by Sugar
Labs volunteers and local communities (given that
appropriation of
technology is almost a goal in
itself). More developers are always
welcome.
I can appreciate that this is a public list and the responses must
I know we have our custom kernel, but we publish a
kernel-devel package too?
Where is it?
Here: http://dev.laptop.org/~kernels/public_rpms/f17-xo1.75/
Cheers,
Niels
Any progress in building/publishing kernel-headers for the ARM as with the x86
kernels?
Thx
--- On Fri, 6/15/12, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
From: James Cameron qu...@laptop.org
Subject: Re: XO-1 update to 885
To: Yioryos Asprobounitis mavrot...@yahoo.com
Cc: OLPC Devel devel@lists.laptop.org
Date: Friday, June 15, 2012, 12:56 AM
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 09:35:20PM
With the opportunity of 12.1.0/os14 update in the one of my XO-1s, I also
tried to update my F14 XO-1 to 11.3.1/os885 but I get `can not download update
contents'
Indeed rsync://updates.laptop.org/ does not list build-885. Actually the only
885 build there is the for the XO-1.75.
Gave it some
Thanks.But I do not want to reflash the XO. Just to update it with olpc-update.
--- On Fri, 6/15/12, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn alan...@hotmail.com wrote:
From: Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn alan...@hotmail.com
Subject: RE: XO-1 update to 885
To: mavrot...@yahoo.com, devel@lists.laptop.org
Date:
Could you please do another test, to verify that screen is
not
configuring the serial port any differently with or without
,n,8,1.
You don't need to connect the two laptops together, just use
the one
you use as the serial terminal. The test uses the stty
program to
display the serial
You can reduce the chance of contact noise derailing the
transmission
by connecting the two laptops in a specific order:
or maybe adding ,n,8,1 in the command ?...
(I still think is a good idea to add it in the wiki. Even with the notion that
although not necessary may reduce unexpected
--- On Mon, 6/11/12, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: buildrpm et al on the XO-1.75
To: Yioryos Asprobounitis mavrot...@yahoo.com
Cc: OLPC Devel devel@lists.laptop.org
Date: Monday, June 11, 2012, 12:50 PM
On Sun
Perhaps your comm settings are wrong?
115200,n,8,1 is what they
should be set to.
That did the trick (thus my change in the wiki)
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
? Perhaps your comm settings are wrong??
115200,n,8,1 is what they
should be set to.?
That did the trick (thus my change in the wiki)
I think it was coincidence. Please try without it.
At least in my setting ie XO-1.75 embedded keyboard model with the problem
battery and the
From: Richard A. Smith rich...@laptop.org
To: devel@lists.laptop.org
Subject: Re: XO battery/performance [Devel Digest, Vol 76,
Issue 4]
Message-ID: 4fd5e76c.3010...@laptop.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
On 06/10/2012 01:07 AM, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote
I was trying few things with the arm-3.0-wip kernel and was building fine in
both x86_64 machines and the XO-1.75 itself!
However, buildrpm had some problems. For one, it defaults to /tmp as a builddir
which makes it unusable in any XO. I can understand that is an infrastructure
script but
--- On Sun, 6/3/12, Richard A. Smith rich...@laptop.org wrote:
From: Richard A. Smith rich...@laptop.org
Subject: Re: XO battery/performance [Devel Digest, Vol 76, Issue 4]
To: Yioryos Asprobounitis mavrot...@yahoo.com
Cc: devel@lists.laptop.org
Date: Sunday, June 3, 2012, 8:41 AM
On 06/03
?- We currently crosscompile our kernels for development
?--
? ? ?Untar http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/gcc-4.6.0-from-x86_64-to-armv7.tar.bz2
to /opt, then
PATH=$PATH:/opt/crosstool/gcc-4.6.0/bin/
make ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=armv7-unknown-linux-gnueabi-
?your make
target here
?- We have
--- On Thu, 6/7/12, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote:
From: Chris Ball c...@laptop.org
Subject: Re: Kernel development setup for XO-1.75 [Devel Digest, Vol 76,
Issue 15]
To: Yioryos Asprobounitis mavrot...@yahoo.com
Cc: devel@lists.laptop.org
Date: Thursday, June 7, 2012, 1:28 PM
Hi
I don't see anything that looks obviously wrong. So
here's a test to
see if the EC is going to sleep or not. Run the
battery down to where
the red LED is active. Then power off the
laptop. If the EC goes into
stop mode the red LED should go out after a few
seconds. If you press a
--- On Sat, 6/2/12, Richard Smith rich...@laptop.org wrote:
From: Richard Smith rich...@laptop.org
Subject: Re: XO battery/performance [Devel Digest, Vol 76, Issue 4]
To: Yioryos Asprobounitis mavrot...@yahoo.com
Cc: devel@lists.laptop.org
Date: Saturday, June 2, 2012, 8:27 AM
Most of the test had empty values but the
informative ones (below) show
that the XO-1.5 is better in basic integer
operations and memory bandwidth
while the XO-1.75 is better in float and double
operations as well as in
memory latency.
I'm not sure how much this means for real life
On 05/24/2012 11:59 PM, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote:
laptop serial number. Was it a
pre-production XO-1 ?
Both XO-1s used to test the battery are C2 machines
#CSH7470023EA
#SHF80701C99
The batery in question is
#00802091012110003588
So let me review and see if I have
If you want an idea of low-level performance, I can suggest
running LMBench.
Got the Debian lmbench_3.0-a7 source that compiles and runs fine w/o bitkeeper.
Run the hardware part of the tests on the XO-1.5 (os880) and xo-1.75 (os12-
correct kernel) with the same configuration.
What was
--- On Mon, 5/28/12, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
H. Sorry, I disagree here. You have usage cases, and
they are very
different from each other. There isn't much normal.
I would agree with this.
The original test although intended for other things, suggested that the
--- On Mon, 5/28/12, Jon Nettleton jon.nettle...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Jon Nettleton jon.nettle...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: XO battery/performance
To: Yioryos Asprobounitis mavrot...@yahoo.com
Cc: OLPC Devel devel@lists.laptop.org
Date: Monday, May 28, 2012, 3:45 AM
*snip*
http
--- On Mon, 5/28/12, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: XO battery/performance
To: Yioryos Asprobounitis mavrot...@yahoo.com
Cc: OLPC Devel devel@lists.laptop.org
Date: Monday, May 28, 2012, 2:18 PM
On Sat, May 26
Since I'm trying to figure this strange battery issue (
http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/devel/2012-May/035198.html ) I also tried to
test the XO-1(os880), XO-1.5(os883) and -1.75(os10) battery life and thought to
report it. It might be of help to someone.
The strange battery was not part of
One of my XO batteries (~2years old) is loosing
about
12% of its charge in 24h period while the XO is
off.
This is not related to a specific XO but rather
the
battery itself.
How are you measuring the loss?
Just looking at the Sugar battery monitor in 2 XO-1s
running 21011o0
One of my XO batteries (~2years old) is loosing about
12% of its charge in 24h period while the XO is off.
This is not related to a specific XO but rather the
battery itself.
How are you measuring the loss?
Just looking at the Sugar battery monitor in 2 XO-1s running 21011o0 and os880
--- On Thu, 5/24/12, John Watlington w...@laptop.org wrote:
From: John Watlington w...@laptop.org
Subject: Re: Battery losing charge while off
To: Yioryos Asprobounitis mavrot...@yahoo.com
Cc: John Watlington w...@laptop.org, devel@lists.laptop.org
Date: Thursday, May 24, 2012, 8:52 PM
One of my XO batteries (~2years old) is loosing about 12% of its charge in 24h
period while the XO is off.
This is not related to a specific XO but rather the battery itself.
I did run batman.fth bat-recover just in case but made no difference.
Also tried to clean the contacts of any possible
Tried to compile the arm-3.0-wip kernel on Fedora 14 as suggested in
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Kernel#Cross_compiling
Downloaded compiled and installed in the default location (/usr/local - no
PATH adjustment should be needed) crosstool-ng-1.9.3
Then I:
`export ARCH=arm
export
--- On Wed, 5/16/12, Paul Fox p...@laptop.org wrote:
From: Paul Fox p...@laptop.org
Subject: Re: cross compile
To: Yioryos Asprobounitis mavrot...@yahoo.com
Cc: OLPC Devel devel@lists.laptop.org
Date: Wednesday, May 16, 2012, 1:44 PM
yioryos wrote:
Tried to compile the arm-3.0-wip
--- On Mon, 5/7/12, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: F17-ARM devel tools
To: Yioryos Asprobounitis mavrot...@yahoo.com
Cc: Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com, OLPC Devel
devel@lists.laptop.org
Date: Monday, May
Installed 21009o2.zd in 2 XO-1.75 and on the one the fs failed to expand. fdisk
shows that the card is indeed 4GB and OFW warns in red writing that the image
is smaller than the device.
Anything I should be looking for specifically before I retry or after, if this
repeats?
groupinstall'ed Development Tools on 21009o2 and noticed 2 things.
Kernel-devel is 3.0.19_xo... but kernel-headers is 3.3.4-3.f17.
gcc-4.7.0-4 is an unsigned rpm.
Are these expected and OK to go on?
Thx
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
So, the 3.3.4 headers are fine for the 3.0.19 kernel?
Thx again
--- On Mon, 5/7/12, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: F17-ARM devel tools
To: Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com
Cc: Yioryos Asprobounitis mavrot
--- On Mon, 5/7/12, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: F17-ARM devel tools
To: Yioryos Asprobounitis mavrot...@yahoo.com
Cc: Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com, OLPC Devel
devel@lists.laptop.org
Date: Monday, May
--- On Tue, 4/3/12, Mikus Grinbergs mi...@bga.com wrote:
From: Mikus Grinbergs mi...@bga.com
Subject: Re: 12.1.0 devel build 6 released, for the XO-1, XO-1.5 and XO-1.75
To: Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com
Cc: o...@lists.fedoraproject.org, devel@lists.laptop.org
Date: Tuesday, April 3,
--- On Mon, 4/2/12, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 2, 2012 7:16 PM, Yioryos Asprobounitis mavrot...@yahoo.com wrote:
It would appear that I came up an XO-1 3.3 kernel bug (albeit not with an
OLPC build yet, but the bug is not there with OLPC 2.6.35 or OLPC 3.1
--- On Tue, 4/3/12, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: 3.3 kernel bug
To: Yioryos Asprobounitis mavrot...@yahoo.com
Cc: OLPC Devel devel@lists.laptop.org
Date: Tuesday, April 3, 2012, 5:04 AM
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 10:00 AM
It would appear that I came up an XO-1 3.3 kernel bug (albeit not with an OLPC
build yet, but the bug is not there with OLPC 2.6.35 or OLPC 3.1 and identical
userspace)
Its a regression in fs/namei.c, full_name_hash()/hash_name(), regarding files
with 8 character names or multiples of it
More
It would appear the the SDcard support on the XO-1 3.3 kernel is broken.
The card can not be (sudo) mounted manually and udev fails to make the mmcblk*
devices.
I also recompiled a kernel for puppylinux and still fails to see the SDcards
even if I manually add the devices. So it does not appear
1 - 100 of 285 matches
Mail list logo
