Re: XO1.75 - Devel Digest, Vol 155, Issue 1

2020-06-07 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
Message: 1 Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2020 11:41:33 + (UTC) From: Yioryos Asprobounitis To: "devel@lists.laptop.org" Subject: XO1.75 Message-ID: <2133017554.128519.1591443693...@mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi list I dug out my XOs to check their conditio

XO1.75

2020-06-06 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
Hi list I dug out my XOs to check their condition and my XO-1.75 (SKU203) refuses to boot as if it was wiped out clean or has no microSD card at all. The screen comes up and nothing further. Firmware check just show a double zero [00]  Trying to install a fresh OS from USB fails (with the same

Re: [support-gang] XO-1 vs Sugar 0.104 performance, and swap to NAND Flash

2015-04-13 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
To check, make sure the laptop is unlocked, and add this to the second line of the boot/olpc.fth file: dev /sd patch 2drop cb! sdhci-card-power-off dend Does this keep the SD slot powered only when is occupied or regardless? Does the OS takes over the SD slot power management

trying 41001qq

2015-02-15 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
It is nice to see a new build for all the XOs after some time now. Tried 41001qq at the ends of the spectrum my G1G1 XO-1 and a touch XO-4 Both worked and I even got them to collaborate on measure activity On the XO-4 things are really nice and with the SMP kernel things are moving reasonably

Firmware q7c04

2015-02-14 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
Nice to see the list back up and running. According to the info XO4 firmware q7c04 support(s) booting legacy android kernel However both os32013a4 and 3214a4 fail to boot under q7c04. Do they qualify as legacy android kernel? BTW is there any official or community SMP android/sugar builds in the

Re: Announcing another early Android build for XO-4 [Devel Digest, Vol 98, Issue 13]

2014-04-24 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
Chrome is failing to enforce minimum font size in various sites (try github as an example) making browsing unpleasant. Not sure if this is a chrome or a build bug but other browsers work fine (Boat look the best). The previous browser was also better on that front.  I've just tested Chrome on

Re: Announcing another early Android build for XO-4 [Devel Digest, Vol 98, Issue 11]

2014-04-21 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
- Chrome as default browser, Chrome is failing to enforce minimum font size in various sites (try github as an example) making browsing unpleasant. Not sure if this is a chrome or a build bug but other browsers work fine (Boat look the best). The previous browser was also better on

Re: Multi-touch [Devel Digest, Vol 98, Issue 7]

2014-04-13 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
If a picture is a thousand words, what about a video [1] or [2]  Some real magic after 22 sec ;-) XO-4 touch, build 32013a4/2014-04-07, firmware q7b38, Android 4.3.1, app: Multitouch Vis Test [1] https://flic.kr/p/n3KFa2 [2] http://tinypic.com/r/2ed74ab/8

Re: Multi-touch [Devel Digest, Vol 98, Issue 9]

2014-04-13 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
  If a picture is a thousand words, what about a video [1] or [2]? Thanks for testing.  I hope this will be useful to our developer. What is the SKU?  Check label underneath battery, or type .mfg-data at ok prompt and read tag sk. 306 What is the touchscreen firmware version?  See

Re:Multi-touch [ Devel Digest, Vol 98, Issue 6]

2014-04-11 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
I could not find Settings, Developer options but I did find Settings,  System, Accessibility, Magnification gestures which by default is off.  Turning it on enabled pan and zoom. Not sure but it seems that you need to tripletap first and then pan  and zoom are available, pan seems to

Re: Multi-touch [ Devel Digest, Vol 98, Issue 6]

2014-04-11 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
Actually zoom, pinch, triple tap etc all work without turning   magnification gestures on. Not for me. No zooming until I turn on magnification gestures and  triple tap. I am testing on the home screen and browser. I cannot start google maps because I have the 8686 wifi module. Maybe 

Re: Announcing another early Android build for XO-4 [Devel Digest, Vol 98, Issue 2]

2014-04-08 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
This is a disturbingly nice build! When video recording will also work will be great. Tested bluetooth connection to an iMac with no issues (file transfers) It would be nice if the screen rotation button could be used to block screen rotation. An Android 4.3.1 (Jelly Bean) build for the

[ANNOUNCE] FatDogARM beta1

2014-03-13 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
This is to announce the FatDogARM beta-1, a desktop-style OS for ARM machines, for the XO-4 and XO-1.75. In contrast to the alpha versions, beta versions are a complete rebuild and are optimized for ARMv7 with vfp3-d16. Thus will run equally well on both the XO-4 and the XO-1.75. The OS is

Re: 32013a4 [Devel Digest, Vol 96, Issue 26]

2014-02-27 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
  An Android 4.3.1 (Jelly Bean) build for the XO-4 laptop. OLPC is preparing an Android, Sugar and Gnome dual-boot system for the XO-4. Our next development release of a dual boot build is available. The build is based on our arm-3.5 kernel, with changes which can be found in the

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Fatdog-ARM Linux for the XO-4

2013-10-07 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
For people who want to try your build, you have made it harder for them, for (in my opinion) no good reason. Here is a script that will download FatDog-ARM Linux for the XO-4 (if not already downloaded) and install it along side the Fedora build in the internal storage as an alt-boot,

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Fatdog-ARM Linux for the XO-4

2013-10-06 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
3.  external media such as SD card and USB drives are not always available, but internal media is always available, That is also why we do not provide zd images that would be easier to install.  People that want it in the internal eMMC  should know how to do it too ;) For people

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Fatdog-ARM Linux for the XO-4

2013-10-04 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
Does not boot if the files are unpacked onto internal eMMC and no external SD card is present.  Workaround: edit olpc.fth to ensure mmcblk0 is used regardless. Thanks for the suggestion. However, we do not want to affect the original XO OS. That is also why we do not provide zd images that

[ANNOUNCE] Fatdog-ARM Linux for the XO-4

2013-10-03 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
James [1] and I are happy to announce the release 1.0 of FatDog-ARM Linux [2] for the XO-4 laptops. Version 1.0 Is a fully functional XO-4 OS and development environment. Download from [3] Further information in [4] [1] http://jamesbond3142.no-ip.org/blog/ [2]

Fatdog linux for ARM-XOs

2013-09-13 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
This is the first development release of fatdog-arm linux [1] for the XO-ARM laptops. It is intended for development/debugging and at 300MB contains all the development tools and headers. Additional packages are available from the repo through slapt-get/gslapt. Development goes on in fatdog-arm

ARM XO model

2013-08-30 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
Is the XO version/model info somewhere in /sys for the ARM XOs as it is for the x86 XOs (in /sys/class/dmi/id/)? Thx ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel

Re: XO-tablet development? [Devel Digest, Vol 90, Issue 8]

2013-08-14 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
  By proposing that further development work be native to Android, you are locking the fruits of that labor away from: - Any child using a current XO laptop - Any child using any other Linux laptop, such as the millions of children in Brazil, Venezuela, Argentina, etc... - Any child

Re: XO-tablet development? [Devel Digest, Vol 90, Issue 8]

2013-08-13 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
Paul wrote: UI software and integration was by an OLPC-funded team, which until recently was completely separate from the laptop development team. ie, now is not? yes, now not separate. If not, which way the tablet/laptop development team is heading? don't know, sorry.  

Re: XO-tablet development? [Devel Digest, Vol 90, Issue 8]

2013-08-13 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
On Aug 13, 2013, at 1:09 PM, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote:   Paul wrote:   If not, which way the tablet/laptop development team is heading?   don't know, sorry.   OK, thanks.   Hopefully someone that does will care to comment. It is lack of accurate knowledge of the future, not caring

Re: XO-tablet development? [Devel Digest, Vol 90, Issue 7]

2013-08-12 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
UI software and integration was by an OLPC-funded team, which until recently was completely separate from the laptop development team. ie, now is not? If not, which way the tablet/laptop development team is heading? paul =- paul fox, p...@laptop.org

Re: XO-1(.75)

2013-07-06 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
Is in shell.log file OK thanks. Unfortunately this entry is not created when activities are launched by sugar-launch. Any line of code that could mend this? Gonzalo On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Yioryos Asprobounitis mavrot...@yahoo.com wrote: Metodology: * Changed

Re: XO-1(.75)

2013-07-05 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
Metodology: * Changed SUGAR_LOGGER_DEVEL * The activities were started from the listview, then are new instances * The start up time is the time reported by sugar in the log. Looked throughout $HOME/.sugar/default and could not find the launched in time reported anywere  Could you please

Re: XO-1(.75)

2013-07-04 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
- Original Message - From: James Cameron qu...@laptop.org To: Yioryos Asprobounitis mavrot...@yahoo.com Cc: OLPC Devel devel@lists.laptop.org Sent: Thursday, July 4, 2013 8:44 AM Subject: Re: XO-1(.75) On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 10:02:15PM -0700, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote

Re: XO-1(.75)

2013-07-04 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
So, having someone generate activity startup time numbers in a fair test (i.e. same platform, different software versions) would be of value.   Tried the following little script but I can not find a way to get the output of 'time' command to the output.txt file. Any suggestions? #!/bin/bash

Re: XO-1(.75)

2013-07-04 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
The following script appears to work as expected, but is the result valid? That's hard to judge without having an explanation for what you are trying to measure. I can't immediately see your intentions from reading the script. Daniel My intention is to get a list of the user and

XO-1(.75)

2013-07-03 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
I'm using the XO-1.75 a bit more these days and gives me a sense of XO-1 performance wise. So I compared my (500/200 overclocked) XO-1 running F14/os885/Sugar-0.94 to XO-1.75 running F-18/13.2.0-11/Sugar-0.98. XO-1.75 was significantly faster to boot (~20sec). However, XO-1 was faster (to open) 

Re: XO-1(.75)

2013-07-03 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
- Original Message - From: James Cameron qu...@laptop.org To: Yioryos Asprobounitis mavrot...@yahoo.com Cc: OLPC Devel devel@lists.laptop.org Sent: Thursday, July 4, 2013 2:10 AM Subject: Re: XO-1(.75) On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 02:21:08PM -0700, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote: I'm

Re: resurrected XO-1.5, died again

2013-07-02 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
I agree.  I've found laptops with looser-than-i-would-like hinge and motherboard screws after children have been using them.  The hinge screws that are uncovered by disassembly were the most interesting. There was a problem with the manufacturing process which resulted in some of the

resurrected XO-1.5, died again

2013-07-01 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
I do not know for how long the toasted [1] XO-1.5 boards worked but my oven baked [2] board died again after 8 months of daily use and a guestimated 400+ hours. I do not know if this is long enough to justify the process (roughly half a school year worth, I would guess), but I thought to record

Re: resurrected XO-1.5, died again

2013-07-01 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
- Original Message - From: James Cameron qu...@laptop.org To: Yioryos Asprobounitis mavrot...@yahoo.com Cc: OLPC Devel devel@lists.laptop.org Sent: Monday, July 1, 2013 11:02 AM Subject: Re: resurrected XO-1.5, died again On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 12:53:47AM -0700, Yioryos

Re: GNOME on XO-1.75

2013-07-01 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
- Original Message - The crash in X is certainly worth a ticket.    http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/12717 ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel

Re: GNOME on XO-1.75

2013-07-01 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
- Original Message - From: Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org To: Yioryos Asprobounitis mavrot...@yahoo.com Cc: OLPC Devel devel@lists.laptop.org Sent: Monday, July 1, 2013 7:38 PM Subject: Re: GNOME on XO-1.75 On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 1:55 AM, Yioryos Asprobounitis mavrot...@yahoo.com

squashfs module for ARM kernels

2013-05-15 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
The 3.0 and 3.5 olpc ARM karnels do have any squashfs support. Could be activated as for the x86 kernels. We are trying to get an pan-XO Tinycore linux build that can be put in a stick and allow booting and customization of any XO model (like the now depreciated customization stick [1]).

Re: [support-gang] [Server-devel] 1TB drive of quality open content on XO/XS--won't boot

2013-05-13 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
OLPC kernels do *not* support NTFS (# CONFIG_NTFS_FS is not set). It either should be activated in future builds or use another FS. I believe tha FAT32 (VFAT) can handle big drives and is universal. However it has a number of other problems that may not suit your needs (reliability, permissions

wifi power on/off

2013-04-04 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
I'm trying to cycle the power of the wifi card on the XO-1{.5] but after half an hour of fruitless searching of the list/wiki/web I thought to ask, since I remember being discussed here. Could please someone points to the terminal commands to turn off and on power on the usb8388 and sd8686

Updating from 31035o[0,2] to 32002o[0,2]

2013-03-27 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
On the XO-1 olpc-update failed on 2 consecutive attempts with different manifest error each time. In both case when was getting tight on disk space. The update requires significant free space (more than 250MB) and time (more than 2 hours). Maybe olpc-update from 13.1.0 to 13.2.0 is

gcc-4.7.x and kernel compilation

2012-11-07 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
As far as I can see fedora-18 uses gcc-4.7.3. From what I understand (and tested, though with gcc-4.7.1) with gcc-4.7.x, 2.6.35 kernel compilation fails because of a asmregparm call in ptrace.h, . I was wondering if the olpc-2.6.35 kernel source should be patched with this patch:

Gnome in os9

2012-11-07 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
I can understand is not a priority right now but I ventured a bit on the GNOME side of os9. Is considerably improved! A couple of issues on the XO-1.75. Abiword exits with the cryptic Aborted. Switching back to Sugar (or restarting X) takes a good 30 seconds after the gnome panel has exited,

software update after olpc-update

2012-11-06 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
Updated an XO-1 and an XO-1.75 from os7 to os9 and would appear that the first reboot software update still has some issues. When the process is initiated as prompted at the 1st boot post-update, the progress bar stops after the first or second activity, and looks like froze though the process

Re: software update after olpc-update

2012-11-06 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
--- On Tue, 11/6/12, fors...@ozonline.com.au fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote: sounds like http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/12272 Yes. That's the one. Sorry for the repetition. I guess missed it. Updated an XO-1 and an XO-1.75 from os7 to os9 and would appear that the first reboot software

viafb-camera: Funky IRQ

2012-10-21 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
I'm trying to use ffmpeg/ffplay (version 0.6.3-rpmfusion) on os885 to make a simple app for camera recording/viewing on XO-1.5. The problem I have is that only the first or a couple of initial frames are showing/recorded and then it freezes there. With ffplay -loglevel 7, kernel shows: [

Re: viafb-camera: Funky IRQ

2012-10-21 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
. Not even ffplay or the application. So is just an ffmpeg/ffplay issue. Thus the request for any experience on the subject (ffmpeg/XO) On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 02:36:54AM -0700, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote: I'm trying to use ffmpeg/ffplay (version 0.6.3-rpmfusion) on os885 to make a simple app

Re: XO-1.5's sudden death - oven resurrected!

2012-10-17 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
--- On Wed, 10/17/12, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote: I wouldn't warm my sandwich in them, for the reasons described here. But damn it's tempting. Go for it :-P You are probably safe (or to be more precise, is not going to make it much worse) :-o Till the 80s (how old

Re: XO-1.5's sudden death - oven resurrected!

2012-10-16 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
Devel devel@lists.laptop.org, Yioryos Asprobounitis mavrot...@yahoo.com Date: Tuesday, October 16, 2012, 12:59 AM I've given multiple machines to anna to 'bake'.  Alas, it is my feedback that In general, they've ressurrected but only for a short period of time.  I am unaware of a long term

Re: XO-1.5's sudden death - oven resurrected!

2012-10-15 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
--- On Mon, 10/15/12, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: From: James Cameron qu...@laptop.org Subject: Re: XO-1.5's sudden death To: Yioryos Asprobounitis mavrot...@yahoo.com Cc: OLPC Devel devel@lists.laptop.org Date: Monday, October 15, 2012, 2:39 AM Yes, I know it so well known that I

Re: XO-1.5's sudden death - oven resurrected!

2012-10-15 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
--- On Mon, 10/15/12, Chris Leonard cjlhomeaddr...@gmail.com wrote: From: Chris Leonard cjlhomeaddr...@gmail.com Subject: Re: XO-1.5's sudden death - oven resurrected! To: James Cameron qu...@laptop.org, Yioryos Asprobounitis mavrot...@yahoo.com, OLPC Devel devel@lists.laptop.org Date

Re: XO-1.5's sudden death - oven resurrected!

2012-10-15 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
--- On Tue, 10/16/12, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: From: James Cameron qu...@laptop.org Subject: Re: XO-1.5's sudden death - oven resurrected! To: Yioryos Asprobounitis mavrot...@yahoo.com Cc: OLPC Devel devel@lists.laptop.org, Chris Leonard cjlhomeaddr...@gmail.com Date: Tuesday

XO-1.5's sudden death

2012-10-14 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
My XO-1.5 that I use daily appears dead this morning. :-( Was working trouble free till last night (os885). Powered off normally and this morning when powering up the power light comes up green, the screen flashes momentarily (screen lights OK I assume) and then nothing. No screen, no chime.

Re: [support-gang] Regarding temporary pauses, perhaps due to using an SD card with an XO

2012-10-13 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
--- On Sat, 10/13/12, Mikus Grinbergs mi...@bga.com wrote: From: Mikus Grinbergs mi...@bga.com Subject: [support-gang] Regarding temporary pauses, perhaps due to using an SD card with an XO To: Community Support Volunteers -- who help respond to help AT laptop.org

F18/os4 on XO-1 [Devel Digest, Vol 79, Issue 37]

2012-09-30 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
The Fly away Peter, fly away Paul release. THIS IS A DEVELOPMENT RELEASE This is the first release adding support for the XO-4 I do not have an XO-4 but I tried 31004 on XO-1 and XO-1.75 and besides some, I assume Gtk3 related, sugar issues present in both machines, there are some

Re: F18/os4 on XO-1 [Devel Digest, Vol 79, Issue 37]

2012-09-30 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
--- On Mon, 10/1/12, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote: From: Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org Subject: Re: F18/os4 on XO-1 [Devel Digest, Vol 79, Issue 37] To: Yioryos Asprobounitis mavrot...@yahoo.com Cc: devel@lists.laptop.org Date: Monday, October 1, 2012, 12:10 AM   I do not have

Re: XO battery/performance [Devel Digest, Vol 76, Issue 21]

2012-07-22 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
--- On Sun, 7/22/12, Richard A. Smith rich...@laptop.org wrote: Actually I believe it is worth the trouble because there is never just a single problem that doesn't happen to another machine.  If you have this failure then there are probably many more.  Its just never been reported. I'm

Re: XO battery/performance [Devel Digest, Vol 76, Issue 21]

2012-07-21 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
--- On Thu, 7/19/12, Richard Smith rich...@laptop.org wrote: - Boot the XO. Sugar or OFW either will work. - Run on battery and allow the battery to discharge until is says its 90% - Connect power and let the battery charge to full. - Reboot XO and stop at OFW. - ok batman-start

Re: XO battery/performance [Devel Digest, Vol 76, Issue 21]

2012-07-21 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
--- On Sat, 7/21/12, Richard A. Smith rich...@laptop.org wrote: Yes and I'll continue to say it as long as you continue to do things that are invalid and will produce nonsensical results.  I've told you a few times that when you run commands like bg-acr! that you are modifying important

Re: XO battery/performance [Devel Digest, Vol 76, Issue 21]

2012-07-18 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
--- On Wed, 7/18/12, Richard Smith rich...@laptop.org wrote: - Start with the XO in a clean working condition. ie remove all power and battery. - Boot the XO. Sugar or OFW either will work. - Run on battery and allow the battery to discharge until is says its 90% - Connect power and

usb8xxx firmware

2012-07-09 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
In a *non* olpc/fedora XO-1 build, liberates consistently fails to find the usb8xxx firmware after suspend/resume (error -2) though on boot, re-boot has no problem. This does not appear to be a powered issue, and does not happen with the libertas-sdio of XO-1.5 (with identical user-space)

Re: Fedora 18 features that could affect xo-1 [Devel Digest, Vol 76, Issue 51]

2012-06-23 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
I think you do not give enough credit to the work being done by Sugar Labs volunteers and local communities (given that appropriation of technology is almost a goal in itself).   More developers are always welcome. I can appreciate that this is a public list and the responses must

Re: kernel-devel package [Devel Digest, Vol 76, Issue 34]

2012-06-15 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
I know we have our custom kernel, but we publish a kernel-devel package too? Where is it? Here: http://dev.laptop.org/~kernels/public_rpms/f17-xo1.75/ Cheers, Niels Any progress in building/publishing kernel-headers for the ARM as with the x86 kernels? Thx

Re: XO-1 update to 885

2012-06-15 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
--- On Fri, 6/15/12, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: From: James Cameron qu...@laptop.org Subject: Re: XO-1 update to 885 To: Yioryos Asprobounitis mavrot...@yahoo.com Cc: OLPC Devel devel@lists.laptop.org Date: Friday, June 15, 2012, 12:56 AM On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 09:35:20PM

XO-1 update to 885

2012-06-14 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
With the opportunity of 12.1.0/os14 update in the one of my XO-1s, I also tried to update my F14 XO-1 to 11.3.1/os885 but I get `can not download update contents' Indeed rsync://updates.laptop.org/ does not list build-885. Actually the only 885 build there is the for the XO-1.75. Gave it some

RE: XO-1 update to 885

2012-06-14 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
Thanks.But I do not want to reflash the XO. Just to update it with olpc-update. --- On Fri, 6/15/12, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn alan...@hotmail.com wrote: From: Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn alan...@hotmail.com Subject: RE: XO-1 update to 885 To: mavrot...@yahoo.com, devel@lists.laptop.org Date:

Re: Re: XO battery/performance[ Devel Digest, Vol 76, Issue 21]

2012-06-13 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
Could you please do another test, to verify that screen is not configuring the serial port any differently with or without ,n,8,1. You don't need to connect the two laptops together, just use the one you use as the serial terminal.  The test uses the stty program to display the serial

Re: Re: XO battery/performance[ Devel Digest, Vol 76, Issue 21]

2012-06-13 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
You can reduce the chance of contact noise derailing the transmission by connecting the two laptops in a specific order: or maybe adding ,n,8,1 in the command ?... (I still think is a good idea to add it in the wiki. Even with the notion that although not necessary may reduce unexpected

Re: buildrpm et al on the XO-1.75

2012-06-12 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
--- On Mon, 6/11/12, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote: From: Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com Subject: Re: buildrpm et al on the XO-1.75 To: Yioryos Asprobounitis mavrot...@yahoo.com Cc: OLPC Devel devel@lists.laptop.org Date: Monday, June 11, 2012, 12:50 PM On Sun

Re: Re: XO battery/performance[ Devel Digest, Vol 76, Issue 21]

2012-06-12 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
  Perhaps your comm settings are wrong?  115200,n,8,1 is what they should be set to.  That did the trick (thus my change in the wiki) ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel

Re: Re: XO battery/performance[ Devel Digest, Vol 76, Issue 21]

2012-06-12 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
? Perhaps your comm settings are wrong?? 115200,n,8,1 is what they should be set to.? That did the trick (thus my change in the wiki) I think it was coincidence.  Please try without it. At least in my setting ie XO-1.75 embedded keyboard model with the problem battery and the

Re: XO battery/performance [Devel Digest, Vol 76, Issue 21]

2012-06-12 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
From: Richard A. Smith rich...@laptop.org To: devel@lists.laptop.org Subject: Re: XO battery/performance [Devel Digest, Vol 76, Issue 4] Message-ID: 4fd5e76c.3010...@laptop.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed On 06/10/2012 01:07 AM, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote

buildrpm et al on the XO-1.75

2012-06-10 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
I was trying few things with the arm-3.0-wip kernel and was building fine in both x86_64 machines and the XO-1.75 itself! However, buildrpm had some problems. For one, it defaults to /tmp as a builddir which makes it unusable in any XO. I can understand that is an infrastructure script but

Re: XO battery/performance [Devel Digest, Vol 76, Issue 4]

2012-06-09 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
--- On Sun, 6/3/12, Richard A. Smith rich...@laptop.org wrote: From: Richard A. Smith rich...@laptop.org Subject: Re: XO battery/performance [Devel Digest, Vol 76, Issue 4] To: Yioryos Asprobounitis mavrot...@yahoo.com Cc: devel@lists.laptop.org Date: Sunday, June 3, 2012, 8:41 AM On 06/03

Re: Kernel development setup for XO-1.75 [Devel Digest, Vol 76, Issue 15]

2012-06-07 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
?- We currently crosscompile our kernels for development ?-- ? ? ?Untar http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/gcc-4.6.0-from-x86_64-to-armv7.tar.bz2 to /opt, then PATH=$PATH:/opt/crosstool/gcc-4.6.0/bin/ make ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=armv7-unknown-linux-gnueabi- ?your make target here ?- We have

Re: Kernel development setup for XO-1.75 [Devel Digest, Vol 76, Issue 15]

2012-06-07 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
--- On Thu, 6/7/12, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote: From: Chris Ball c...@laptop.org Subject: Re: Kernel development setup for XO-1.75 [Devel Digest, Vol 76, Issue 15] To: Yioryos Asprobounitis mavrot...@yahoo.com Cc: devel@lists.laptop.org Date: Thursday, June 7, 2012, 1:28 PM Hi

Re: XO battery/performance [Devel Digest, Vol 76, Issue 4]

2012-06-02 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
I don't see anything that looks obviously wrong.  So here's a test to see if the EC is going to sleep or not.  Run the battery down to where the red LED is active.  Then power off the laptop.  If the EC goes into stop mode the red LED should go out after a few seconds.  If you press a

Re: XO battery/performance [Devel Digest, Vol 76, Issue 4]

2012-06-02 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
--- On Sat, 6/2/12, Richard Smith rich...@laptop.org wrote: From: Richard Smith rich...@laptop.org Subject: Re: XO battery/performance [Devel Digest, Vol 76, Issue 4] To: Yioryos Asprobounitis mavrot...@yahoo.com Cc: devel@lists.laptop.org Date: Saturday, June 2, 2012, 8:27 AM

Re: XO battery/performance [Devel Digest, Vol 76, Issue 4]

2012-06-01 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
  Most of the test had empty values but the informative ones (below) show that the XO-1.5 is better in basic integer operations and memory bandwidth while the XO-1.75 is better in float and double operations as well as in memory latency. I'm not sure how much this means for real life

Re: Battery losing charge while off [Devel Digest, Vol 75, Issue 63]

2012-05-31 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
On 05/24/2012 11:59 PM, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote: laptop serial number.   Was it a pre-production XO-1 ? Both XO-1s used to test the battery are C2 machines #CSH7470023EA #SHF80701C99 The batery in question is #00802091012110003588 So let me review and see if I have

Re: XO battery/performance

2012-05-30 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
If you want an idea of low-level performance, I can suggest running LMBench. Got the Debian lmbench_3.0-a7 source that compiles and runs fine w/o bitkeeper. Run the hardware part of the tests on the XO-1.5 (os880) and xo-1.75 (os12- correct kernel) with the same configuration. What was

Re: XO battery/performance

2012-05-29 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
--- On Mon, 5/28/12, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote: H. Sorry, I disagree here. You have usage cases, and they are very different from each other. There isn't much normal. I would agree with this. The original test although intended for other things, suggested that the

Re: XO battery/performance

2012-05-28 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
--- On Mon, 5/28/12, Jon Nettleton jon.nettle...@gmail.com wrote: From: Jon Nettleton jon.nettle...@gmail.com Subject: Re: XO battery/performance To: Yioryos Asprobounitis mavrot...@yahoo.com Cc: OLPC Devel devel@lists.laptop.org Date: Monday, May 28, 2012, 3:45 AM *snip* http

Re: XO battery/performance

2012-05-28 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
--- On Mon, 5/28/12, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote: From: Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com Subject: Re: XO battery/performance To: Yioryos Asprobounitis mavrot...@yahoo.com Cc: OLPC Devel devel@lists.laptop.org Date: Monday, May 28, 2012, 2:18 PM On Sat, May 26

XO battery/performance

2012-05-26 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
Since I'm trying to figure this strange battery issue ( http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/devel/2012-May/035198.html ) I also tried to test the XO-1(os880), XO-1.5(os883) and -1.75(os10) battery life and thought to report it. It might be of help to someone. The strange battery was not part of

Re: Battery losing charge while off

2012-05-25 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
One of my XO batteries (~2years old) is loosing about 12% of its charge in 24h period while the XO is off. This is not related to a specific XO but rather the battery itself. How are you measuring the loss? Just looking at the Sugar battery monitor in 2 XO-1s running 21011o0

Re: Battery losing charge while off

2012-05-24 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
One of my XO batteries (~2years old) is loosing about 12% of its charge in 24h period while the XO is off. This is not related to a specific XO but rather the battery itself. How are you measuring the loss? Just looking at the Sugar battery monitor in 2 XO-1s running 21011o0 and os880

Re: Battery losing charge while off

2012-05-24 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
--- On Thu, 5/24/12, John Watlington w...@laptop.org wrote: From: John Watlington w...@laptop.org Subject: Re: Battery losing charge while off To: Yioryos Asprobounitis mavrot...@yahoo.com Cc: John Watlington w...@laptop.org, devel@lists.laptop.org Date: Thursday, May 24, 2012, 8:52 PM

Battery losing charge while off

2012-05-23 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
One of my XO batteries (~2years old) is loosing about 12% of its charge in 24h period while the XO is off. This is not related to a specific XO but rather the battery itself. I did run batman.fth bat-recover just in case but made no difference. Also tried to clean the contacts of any possible

cross compile

2012-05-16 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
Tried to compile the arm-3.0-wip kernel on Fedora 14 as suggested in http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Kernel#Cross_compiling Downloaded compiled and installed in the default location (/usr/local - no PATH adjustment should be needed) crosstool-ng-1.9.3 Then I: `export ARCH=arm export

Re: cross compile

2012-05-16 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
--- On Wed, 5/16/12, Paul Fox p...@laptop.org wrote: From: Paul Fox p...@laptop.org Subject: Re: cross compile To: Yioryos Asprobounitis mavrot...@yahoo.com Cc: OLPC Devel devel@lists.laptop.org Date: Wednesday, May 16, 2012, 1:44 PM yioryos wrote: Tried to compile the arm-3.0-wip

Re: F17-ARM devel tools

2012-05-11 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
--- On Mon, 5/7/12, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote: From: Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com Subject: Re: F17-ARM devel tools To: Yioryos Asprobounitis mavrot...@yahoo.com Cc: Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com, OLPC Devel devel@lists.laptop.org Date: Monday, May

expand fs issue(?)

2012-05-07 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
Installed 21009o2.zd in 2 XO-1.75 and on the one the fs failed to expand. fdisk shows that the card is indeed 4GB and OFW warns in red writing that the image is smaller than the device. Anything I should be looking for specifically before I retry or after, if this repeats?

F17-ARM devel tools

2012-05-07 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
groupinstall'ed Development Tools on 21009o2 and noticed 2 things. Kernel-devel is 3.0.19_xo... but kernel-headers is 3.3.4-3.f17. gcc-4.7.0-4 is an unsigned rpm. Are these expected and OK to go on? Thx ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org

Re: F17-ARM devel tools

2012-05-07 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
So, the 3.3.4 headers are fine for the 3.0.19 kernel? Thx again --- On Mon, 5/7/12, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: From: Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com Subject: Re: F17-ARM devel tools To: Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com Cc: Yioryos Asprobounitis mavrot

Re: F17-ARM devel tools

2012-05-07 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
--- On Mon, 5/7/12, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote: From: Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com Subject: Re: F17-ARM devel tools To: Yioryos Asprobounitis mavrot...@yahoo.com Cc: Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com, OLPC Devel devel@lists.laptop.org Date: Monday, May

Re: 12.1.0 devel build 6 released, for the XO-1, XO-1.5 and XO-1.75

2012-04-03 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
--- On Tue, 4/3/12, Mikus Grinbergs mi...@bga.com wrote: From: Mikus Grinbergs mi...@bga.com Subject: Re: 12.1.0 devel build 6 released, for the XO-1, XO-1.5 and XO-1.75 To: Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com Cc: o...@lists.fedoraproject.org, devel@lists.laptop.org Date: Tuesday, April 3,

Re: 3.3 kernel bug

2012-04-03 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
--- On Mon, 4/2/12, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Apr 2, 2012 7:16 PM, Yioryos Asprobounitis mavrot...@yahoo.com wrote: It would appear that I came up an XO-1 3.3 kernel bug (albeit not with an OLPC build yet, but the bug is not there with OLPC 2.6.35 or OLPC 3.1

Re: 3.3 kernel bug

2012-04-03 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
--- On Tue, 4/3/12, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: From: Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com Subject: Re: 3.3 kernel bug To: Yioryos Asprobounitis mavrot...@yahoo.com Cc: OLPC Devel devel@lists.laptop.org Date: Tuesday, April 3, 2012, 5:04 AM On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 10:00 AM

3.3 kernel bug

2012-04-02 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
It would appear that I came up an XO-1 3.3 kernel bug (albeit not with an OLPC build yet, but the bug is not there with OLPC 2.6.35 or OLPC 3.1 and identical userspace) Its a regression in fs/namei.c, full_name_hash()/hash_name(), regarding files with 8 character names or multiples of it More

SDcard support on XO-1 3.3 kernel

2012-03-31 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
It would appear the the SDcard support on the XO-1 3.3 kernel is broken. The card can not be (sudo) mounted manually and udev fails to make the mmcblk* devices. I also recompiled a kernel for puppylinux and still fails to see the SDcards even if I manually add the devices. So it does not appear

  1   2   3   >