Re: [Sugar-devel] Ticket 8104
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Cecilia Abalde caba...@plan.ceibal.edu.uy wrote: I download the patch, then run rpm-ivh Name patch but there is a problem with the files: ... Any ideas ??? Yes - you are trying to upgrade the RPM, instead of installing a previously not installed package, so do rpm -Uvh FooBar-1.2.3.rpm (note the U instead of the i ) Two interesting tidbits - - Daniel Drake (cc'd) suspects the bug has not been fixed upstream (the latest NM/dbus pairing seems to have similar issues). So a similar issue may exist in the F11 images. I don't know if he's filed a corresponding ticket on dev.laptop.org --- we should have it filed, and the two bugs should mention eachother... - The RPM you are grabbing also fixes http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/9715 cheers, m -- martin.langh...@gmail.com mar...@laptop.org -- School Server Architect - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Ticket 8104
Thank you very much !! cheers, Cecilia 2009/12/28 Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Cecilia Abalde caba...@plan.ceibal.edu.uy wrote: I download the patch, then run rpm-ivh Name patch but there is a problem with the files: ... Any ideas ??? Yes - you are trying to upgrade the RPM, instead of installing a previously not installed package, so do rpm -Uvh FooBar-1.2.3.rpm (note the U instead of the i ) Two interesting tidbits - - Daniel Drake (cc'd) suspects the bug has not been fixed upstream (the latest NM/dbus pairing seems to have similar issues). So a similar issue may exist in the F11 images. I don't know if he's filed a corresponding ticket on dev.laptop.org --- we should have it filed, and the two bugs should mention eachother... - The RPM you are grabbing also fixes http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/9715 cheers, m -- martin.langh...@gmail.com mar...@laptop.org -- School Server Architect - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Ticket 8104
On Mon, 2009-12-28 at 09:46 +0100, Martin Langhoff wrote: - Daniel Drake (cc'd) suspects the bug has not been fixed upstream (the latest NM/dbus pairing seems to have similar issues). So a similar issue may exist in the F11 images. I don't know if he's filed a corresponding ticket on dev.laptop.org --- we should have it filed, and the two bugs should mention eachother... In #9750 I did testing and found that even though the bug still exists in the latest code, it seems near-impossible to trigger. Daniel ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Ticket 8104
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 11:37:10AM -0200, Cecilia Abalde wrote: I download the patch, then run rpm-ivh Name patch but there is a problem with the files: file / etc / NetworkManager / dispatcher.d / mpp.py from install of NetworkManager-0.6.5-0.14.svn3246.olpc3.i386 conflicts with file from package NetworkManager-0.6.5-0.11.svn3246.olpc3.i386 XO NetworkManager: NetworkManager-0.6.5-0.11.svn3246.olpc3.i386 Any ideas ??? I don't understand what you are trying to achieve. If you are trying to install a later version of the package, then rpm -i is not correct usage, given that you already have a package of the same name installed. You should use rpm -u if you wish to replace the existing package. -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Ticket 8104
Sorry, that's rpm -U not rpm -u. -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Ticket 8104
I download the patch, then run rpm-ivh Name patch but there is a problem with the files: file / etc / NetworkManager / dispatcher.d / mpp.py from install of NetworkManager-0.6.5-0.14.svn3246.olpc3.i386 conflicts with file from package NetworkManager-0.6.5-0.11.svn3246.olpc3.i386 XO NetworkManager: NetworkManager-0.6.5-0.11.svn3246.olpc3.i386 Any ideas ??? Thank you very much!! merry christmas!! Cecilia 2009/12/23 James Cameron qu...@laptop.org On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 17:33, Cecilia Abalde caba...@plan.ceibal.edu.uy wrote: I have a question about the patch in ticket 8104. to which version of networkmanager was done? If you mean the C implementatiaon of nm-dhcp-client.action, this was a patch relative to NetworkManager 0.6.5 ... and the src.rpm is in Martin's directory: http://dev.laptop.org/~martin/public_rpms/8.2-papercuts/NetworkManager-0.6.5-0.14.svn3246.olpc3.src.rpmhttp://dev.laptop.org/%7Emartin/public_rpms/8.2-papercuts/NetworkManager-0.6.5-0.14.svn3246.olpc3.src.rpm You're also welcome to ask this sort of question in the ticket itself. -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Ticket 8104
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 17:33, Cecilia Abalde caba...@plan.ceibal.edu.uy wrote: Hi, I have a question about the patch in ticket 8104. to which version of networkmanager was done? Hi Cecilia, I'm forwarding our email to the devel mailing list at OLPC because NetworkManager is a component that belongs to the distro, not to Sugar. In case of doubt, you are of course welcome to ask here again. Regards, Tomeu thank you regards Cecilia ___ Sugar-devel mailing list sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel -- «Sugar Labs is anyone who participates in improving and using Sugar. What Sugar Labs does is determined by the participants.» - David Farning ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Ticket 8104
OK! Thank you very much !!! 2009/12/23 Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 17:33, Cecilia Abalde caba...@plan.ceibal.edu.uy wrote: Hi, I have a question about the patch in ticket 8104. to which version of networkmanager was done? Hi Cecilia, I'm forwarding our email to the devel mailing list at OLPC because NetworkManager is a component that belongs to the distro, not to Sugar. In case of doubt, you are of course welcome to ask here again. Regards, Tomeu thank you regards Cecilia ___ Sugar-devel mailing list sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel -- «Sugar Labs is anyone who participates in improving and using Sugar. What Sugar Labs does is determined by the participants.» - David Farning ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Ticket 8104
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 17:33, Cecilia Abalde caba...@plan.ceibal.edu.uy wrote: I have a question about the patch in ticket 8104. to which version of networkmanager was done? If you mean the C implementatiaon of nm-dhcp-client.action, this was a patch relative to NetworkManager 0.6.5 ... and the src.rpm is in Martin's directory: http://dev.laptop.org/~martin/public_rpms/8.2-papercuts/NetworkManager-0.6.5-0.14.svn3246.olpc3.src.rpm You're also welcome to ask this sort of question in the ticket itself. -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
