On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
On 7 June 2010 20:05, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
You are placing far more trust in a trivial rebuild than I would. Once
Fedora ceases testing the actual instruction streams we will be using,
we will be
Ups, I missed the last part.
As you say, leaving CFLAGS intact will probably make -i586 problem free.
Tiago
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 11:38 PM, Tiago Marques tiago...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
On 7 June 2010 20:05, James Cameron
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 5:31 AM, John Gilmore g...@toad.com wrote:
2) FESCo (Fedora Engineering Steering Committee) is dealing with the
issue upstream [1][2] in Fedora with the view of getting it fixed
upstream for F-14 or at the very least clarified. It was agreed in
F-12 that the Geode LX
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 10:19 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
In another thread, we've been discussing the issue that Fedora 12
changed base architecture from i586 to i686. The XO-1 processor (Geode
LX) is a i586. Fedora 12 seems to run OK (although I suspect there
will be a few broken
2) FESCo (Fedora Engineering Steering Committee) is dealing with the
issue upstream [1][2] in Fedora with the view of getting it fixed
upstream for F-14 or at the very least clarified. It was agreed in
F-12 that the Geode LX would be supported and that decision wasn't
discussed otherwise.
On 7 June 2010 18:33, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
1) I thought we'd moved away from rolling our own distro due to the
amount of time and engineering resources it required that OLPC no
longer had. Has this changed? IE is there an internal thing that has
changed that hasn't been
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
2) FESCo (Fedora Engineering Steering Committee) is dealing with the
issue upstream [1][2] in Fedora with the view of getting it fixed
upstream for F-14 or at the very least clarified.
Good to hear there's a good chance
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 11:12 PM, Jon Nettleton jon.nettle...@gmail.comwrote:
2) FESCo (Fedora Engineering Steering Committee) is dealing with the
issue upstream [1][2] in Fedora with the view of getting it fixed
upstream for F-14 or at the very least clarified. It was agreed in
F-12 that
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
2) FESCo (Fedora Engineering Steering Committee) is dealing with the
issue upstream [1][2] in Fedora with the view of getting it fixed
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 11:19 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
On 7 June 2010 18:33, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
1) I thought we'd moved away from rolling our own distro due to the
amount of time and engineering resources it required that OLPC no
longer had. Has this
I looked at the kernel patch for emulating the missing instruction
(long NOP). It looks like it works, and only needs minor patching-up
for security enforcement. The big argument on the Linux kernel list
was about not having a little kludge like this, which is likely to
grow to emulate many
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 07:19:43PM -0300, Daniel Drake wrote:
In this case, the Fedora packages are now unusable, so rebuilding them
would be needed. I'm not sure that this counts as progressing to
rolling our own distro since the rebuild would be fully automatic,
and that the end result would
john wrote:
I looked at the kernel patch for emulating the missing instruction
(long NOP). It looks like it works, and only needs minor patching-up
for security enforcement. The big argument on the Linux kernel list
was about not having a little kludge like this, which is likely to
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 10:07:07PM -0400, Paul Fox wrote:
i agree with john -- we should definitely try the kernel emulation,
and try and gather some statistics on how often it fires, or other
easy metric. i'll bet the cost is low.
Cool, please provide a kernel RPM for testing. ;-)
--
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 1:49 AM, John Gilmore g...@toad.com wrote:
I looked at the kernel patch for emulating the missing instruction
(long NOP). It looks like it works, and only needs minor patching-up
for security enforcement. The big argument on the Linux kernel list
was about not having a
On 7 June 2010 17:58, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
In this case, the Fedora packages are now unusable, so rebuilding them
would be needed. I'm not sure that this counts as progressing to
rolling our own distro since the rebuild would be fully automatic,
and that the end result
On 7 June 2010 20:05, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
You are placing far more trust in a trivial rebuild than I would. Once
Fedora ceases testing the actual instruction streams we will be using,
we will be providing the testing instead. There are some interesting
classes of bugs that
2) FESCo (Fedora Engineering Steering Committee) is dealing with the
issue upstream [1][2] in Fedora with the view of getting it fixed
upstream for F-14 or at the very least clarified. It was agreed in
F-12 that the Geode LX would be supported and that decision wasn't
discussed otherwise.
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 8:48 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
On 4 June 2010 21:48, Tiago Marques tiago...@gmail.com wrote:
If you're planning on doing a repository exclusively for the XO-1, Gentoo is
simple to setup and, from what I read on this mailing list, thicks all your
boxes:
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Jon Nettleton jon.nettle...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 8:48 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
On 4 June 2010 21:48, Tiago Marques tiago...@gmail.com wrote:
If you're planning on doing a repository exclusively for the XO-1, Gentoo is
simple to
There is also an old project on a version of gentoo for the xo 1 on
http://www.gentooxo.org
I tested it sometimes ago and even it is using the gentoo with gnome
it is a lot faster than Fedora 11 on xo.
--
Ahmed Mansour
http://olpc-maroc.blogspot.com
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 10:19 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
In another thread, we've been discussing the issue that Fedora 12
changed base architecture from i586 to i686. The XO-1 processor (Geode
LX) is a i586. Fedora 12 seems to run OK (although I suspect there
will be a few broken
On 4 June 2010 21:48, Tiago Marques tiago...@gmail.com wrote:
If you're planning on doing a repository exclusively for the XO-1, Gentoo is
simple to setup and, from what I read on this mailing list, thicks all your
boxes:
I'm a Gentoo fan myself.
But you're talking about a whole new project
23 matches
Mail list logo
