>> I'm not sure if it was considered, but as the maintainer of swfdec in
>> Fedora I can state that swfdec is very cpu-intensive, and I have my
>> doubts whether the performance on the XO would be comparable to gnash's,
>> though it might be worth investigating.
>
> That has been my experience too,
On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 9:14 PM, Brian Pepple wrote:
> Quick clarification. We discussed making swfdec installed by default
> during the development of Fedora 9, but decided against doing so since
> we felt it wasn't quite ready for that.
>
Ah, thanks for the clarification, I don't run Fedora so
>> swfdec{,-mozilla} use gstreamer, are LGPLed, and support most of the
>> Flash 9 features whereas gnash supports only a few of the Flash 9
>> features. swfdec is also the default Flash player on Fedora, and is
>> the preferred flash player on Ubuntu.
>
> Quick clarification. We discussed making
On Thu, 2009-01-01 at 14:16 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> swfdec{,-mozilla} use gstreamer, are LGPLed, and support most of the
> Flash 9 features whereas gnash supports only a few of the Flash 9
> features. swfdec is also the default Flash player on Fedora, and is
> the preferred flash player on
Hello everyone,
(top-posting due to tangent nature of discussion)
Just a thought here, in my experience, swfdec[1] works far better than
gnash for flash websites; why not use that? There's a Firefox/Gecko
plugin called swfdec-mozilla which works beautifully.
swfdec{,-mozilla} use gstreamer, are L
Dear =S Page,
As the social analog of town drunk on this list, I am flattered as hell to
be lumped in with the smart set!
¡Gracias!
genesee
S Page-2 wrote:
>
> you're just making the smart smarter still.
>
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/Installing-Fla
Dear genesee, Carlos Nazareno, Everybody,
Many more people are going to read
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Adobe_Flash page than follow this mailing
list. Your effect on XO users by only answering problems here is
limited, you're just making the smart smarter still.
Just in time for New Year's r
Back in build 656 AF9 did battle with gnash. yum remove gnash did the trick
in Terminal. Now with build 767 or 790 AF10 and gnash have been quite civil,
none of those stacked duplicate screens or the like.
Of course you do, Scott! Some of your best work yet. Very clear and easy to
follow. Still,
2008/12/29 shivaprasad javali :
> Hi,
> I am trying to install Adobe Flash Player on my OLPC. I followed the
> instructions on this page http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Adobe_Flash#Installation
> to install the flash player. According to it, I have to remove the GNASH
> plugin which comes with the O
Hi Shivaprasad.
You don't have to uninstall GNASH.
Adobe Flash 10 and GNASH should co-exist with the latest OLPC build,
with the Adobe Flash plugin taking over for the browse activity, and
GNASH launchable outside the browser in stand-alone mode.
Regards,
-Naz
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Mon, 29 De
10 matches
Mail list logo
