2009/3/17 Martin Dengler
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 05:42:36AM -0400, John Watlington wrote:
> > On Mar 17, 2009, at 5:34 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 04:48, John Watlington wrote:
> > >> I would expect it to be faster on other processors.
> > >
> > > I don't think the pr
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 12:58:29PM +, Martin Dengler wrote:
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 05:42:36AM -0400, John Watlington wrote:
I doubt the speedup is due to the presence of swap.
Didn't get the original mail (yet), so replying to this one instead.
I don't know if the issue is already fixed i
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Martin Dengler wrote:
> I seem to recall this is one of those conversations that comes up
> periodically, and that once someone / people created a wiki page with
> thoughts on a partitioning layout design that could be of broad use.
> Does anyone know where that wi
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 05:42:36AM -0400, John Watlington wrote:
> On Mar 17, 2009, at 5:34 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 04:48, John Watlington wrote:
> >> I would expect it to be faster on other processors.
> >
> > I don't think the processor is the biggest factor. In my pr
