Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Jerry Vonau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Well other issues popped up, avahi from F7 appeared in a "rpm -q avahi"
>> along with the one from F9 like above. Quick fix:
>> "rpm -e --justdb avahi-0.6.17-1.fc7.i386"
>>
This an upstream issue, t
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Jerry Vonau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Well, it's gone from xs-release -- why does it show up as active?
>> Maybe we have to recommend a manual step, but what would that be?
>>
> It's from fedora-release, and was used for the normal updates repo, until
> the "key
Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Jerry Vonau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Well, the upgrade is not painful. The weird thing I found is about yum,
>> $releasever, and fedora-updates.repo, we have two issues..
>>
>> First with the use of xs-release when I do a "rpm -q --wh
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Martin Langhoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I guess we should have xs-release do:
>> Obsoletes: fedora-release
>
> Ah, that only happens on an update, correct?
Ok - so there's a new xs-release - a yum update should fix that up for you :-)
respinning the wheels.
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Jerry Vonau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well other issues popped up, avahi from F7 appeared in a "rpm -q avahi"
> along with the one from F9 like above. Quick fix:
> "rpm -e --justdb avahi-0.6.17-1.fc7.i386"
>
> I used the same kind of fix for the above fedora-rele
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Jerry Vonau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, the upgrade is not painful. The weird thing I found is about yum,
> $releasever, and fedora-updates.repo, we have two issues..
>
> First with the use of xs-release when I do a "rpm -q --whatprovides
> /etc/fedora-rele
