Re: [Sugar-devel] Activities migration status
On 10 Feb 2009, at 00:29, S Page wrote: Ed McNierney wrote: On the other hand, anyone working on Sugar efforts such as Activity development should be encouraged to put all those efforts under the Sugar Labs roof where they can be more readily available to the entire Sugar community (not just the OLPC portion of it). Then http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Project_hosting is obsolete. What's the equivalent page on sugarlabs.org? Try: http://git.sugarlabs.org/ Its running Gitorious, no need to request permissions/accounts. Parts of http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Creating_an_activity are also out-of-date. Personally I rely on source code and pydocs, but I know that doesn't work for all. I'll try and take a look at that page, before I do, any pointers at to bits you found out-of-date? Here's closest thing on SL, the almanac (migrated from laptop wiki) I find that useful: http://sugarlabs.org/go/ActivityTeam/Resources --Gary -- =S Page ___ Sugar-devel mailing list sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Activities migration status
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Samuel Klein meta...@gmail.com wrote: Is there no way to move/create an activity so that the same code push will update both sl's gitorious and olpc's git? Until there is a policy of sorts in place, and better yet an endowment supporting long-term maintenance of a server hosting projects (one of the two mentioned so far in this thread, or a dedicated project-hosting service elsewhere), I would focus on creating good mirrors, rather than on picking any particular single host. There is currently still risk of losing people's work. While you wait for a best case scenario We will continue to move forward one step at a time. david SJ On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Luke Faraone l...@faraone.cc wrote: On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Samuel Klein meta...@gmail.com wrote: I like that part. Are there criteria for removing someone's project if it's deemed inappropriate? Not yet, but I assume if someone thinks that somebody else's use of SL infrastrucutre is not under the project scope we'll discuss it on the sugar-devel or IAEP mailing list. -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc ___ Sugar-devel mailing list sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Activities migration status
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Samuel Klein meta...@gmail.com wrote: I like that part. Are there criteria for removing someone's project if it's deemed inappropriate? Not yet, but I assume if someone thinks that somebody else's use of SL infrastrucutre is not under the project scope we'll discuss it on the sugar-devel or IAEP mailing list. -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Activities migration status
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 8:34 PM, David Farning dfarn...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Samuel Klein meta...@gmail.com wrote: Is there no way to move/create an activity so that the same code push will update both sl's gitorious and olpc's git? Until there is a policy of sorts in place, and better yet an endowment supporting long-term maintenance of a server hosting projects (one of the two mentioned so far in this thread, or a dedicated project-hosting service elsewhere), I would focus on creating good mirrors, rather than on picking any particular single host. There is currently still risk of losing people's work. While you wait for a best case scenario We will continue to move forward one step at a time. I was replying to the idea that people move backwards, and not mirror their code. SJ ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
