On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 04:54:38PM +0200, Martin Langhoff wrote:
Offtopic: Some of the complaints about 'noise' and clutter in the
Journal are probably about these content-less entries. Yes, the user
has opened Browse.xo 3 times today, but that's hardly a document
worthy of backing up, or even
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Sascha Silbe
sascha-ml-ui-sugar-de...@silbe.org wrote:
I disagree. History and current location are the result of some research and
Only if something useful is stored. I was wrong to point a finger to
Browse - the culprit is Terminal. And we do end up with all
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 17:19, Gary C Martin g...@garycmartin.com wrote:
Hi Martin,
On 30 Mar 2009, at 15:54, Martin Langhoff wrote:
Working a bit on the restore angle of things, if I look at the
metadata entries to build a restorable Journal Entry Bundle... well...
in many cases there is
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 05:11:46PM +0200, Martin Langhoff wrote:
Only if something useful is stored. I was wrong to point a finger to
Browse - the culprit is Terminal.
Try the latest version of Terminal. It does store both current working
directory and the scrollbuffer (awesome, BTW!).
CU
2009/3/30 Sascha Silbe sascha-ml-ui-sugar-de...@silbe.org:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 05:11:46PM +0200, Martin Langhoff wrote:
Only if something useful is stored. I was wrong to point a finger to
Browse - the culprit is Terminal.
Try the latest version of Terminal. It does store both current
On 30 Mar 2009, at 17:27, Eben Eliason wrote:
2009/3/30 Sascha Silbe sascha-ml-ui-sugar-de...@silbe.org:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 05:11:46PM +0200, Martin Langhoff wrote:
Only if something useful is stored. I was wrong to point a finger to
Browse - the culprit is Terminal.
Try the latest
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Gary C Martin g...@garycmartin.com wrote:
On 30 Mar 2009, at 17:27, Eben Eliason wrote:
2009/3/30 Sascha Silbe sascha-ml-ui-sugar-de...@silbe.org:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 05:11:46PM +0200, Martin Langhoff wrote:
Only if something useful is stored. I was
