Re: [Testing] Wireless test results

2009-02-16 Thread Ties Stuij
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Gary C Martin g...@garycmartin.com wrote: On 16 Feb 2009, at 05:32, Chris Ball wrote: Hi, Last I checked, it was either the firmware or the kernel changes that did it. I posted my findings to the mailing list in the past two weeks. I think your findings

Re: [Testing] Wireless test results

2009-02-16 Thread rihowa...@gmail.com
I find 767, with either q2e18 or q2e24, connecting to a WPA AP succeeds 100% of the time for me using a Linksys WRT54g L. With OFW q2e32 I have seen the network connection die. Seems like the stack is dead. I assume it is the marvell driver that is delivered with q2e32. My other XO

Re: [Testing] Wireless test results

2009-02-16 Thread Mitch Bradley
The OS is supposed to reload the wireless firmware so the firmware that is in OFW shouldn't affect the OS behavior. rihowa...@gmail.com wrote: I find 767, with either q2e18 or q2e24, connecting to a WPA AP succeeds 100% of the time for me using a Linksys WRT54g L. With OFW q2e32 I have

Re: [Testing] Wireless test results

2009-02-16 Thread James Cameron
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 11:21:34AM -1000, Mitch Bradley wrote: The OS is supposed to reload the wireless firmware so the firmware that is in OFW shouldn't affect the OS behavior. Agreed. It shouldn't. I wonder if it does, through some mechanism we don't know yet. Has anyone else got the

Re: [Testing] Wireless test results

2009-02-16 Thread Mitch Bradley
James Cameron wrote: On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 11:21:34AM -1000, Mitch Bradley wrote: The OS is supposed to reload the wireless firmware so the firmware that is in OFW shouldn't affect the OS behavior. Agreed. It shouldn't. I wonder if it does, through some mechanism we don't