On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 06:15:31PM -0400, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Ed McNierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I would also like to stop calling this "9.1" planning. We need to plan the
> > development work we need to get done, regardless of whether that work will
Does it make sense to have an afternoon or a full day about long-term
plans and their implications for immediate priorities and tests?
Try to capture topics that could be specific agenda items with their
own session or conversation -- by creating a separate thread about it
on the list, a separate
We need to figure out how to start work that takes more than 5 - 6 months
NOW. I'm concerned that if we start the 9.2 planning meeting "after 9.1",
we will (yet again) discover that there's no time to do anything that takes
more than about 5 months. We need to break that cycle and try to figure o
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Ed McNierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would also like to stop calling this "9.1" planning. We need to plan the
> development work we need to get done, regardless of whether that work will
> be able to ship next March. At a certain point we will have some of
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Ed McNierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would also like to stop calling this "9.1" planning. We need to plan
Sounds like it is time for a naming contest for this [repeating]
event. Some that have been suggested / implied:
OLPCSW [08.11.1]
OLPC Miniconfer
Folks -
I would like to spend some time this week getting a bit more consensus on
the goals and agenda for this conversation before we get too far ahead with
planning and invitations. I don't want to spend the first day "setting the
scope and expectations for the week" only to discover that some
Tomeu:
> Scott:
>> I think more like:
>> Nov 17-20: talks and hacking
>> Nov 21: priorities meeting, wrapup.
>>
>> I'm not the "planning committee", but this would be what I'd like to see.
>
> Works for me. Should we be concerned that talk (or aguing) might
> expand so much that there's little ti
Just a couple of additions:
* We should make sure to have a good summary of the actionable items
produced during the meetings, post them to the larger community, gather
feedback and consensus and finally add them to the SL roadmap.
* It would be very beneficial to spend some time explaining SL mi
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 9:33 PM, C. Scott Ananian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Just to clarify: like our "mini-conferences" in the past, the plan is
>>> to have at least three days full of talks and hacking, so t
I'm not sure who the planning committee is, but this is the sort of
schedule I was thinking about, too.
- Ed
On Oct 10, 2008, at 3:33 PM, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Just to clarify: like our "mini-con
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 9:33 PM, C. Scott Ananian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Just to clarify: like our "mini-conferences" in the past, the plan is
>>> to have at least three days full of talks and hacking, so t
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Just to clarify: like our "mini-conferences" in the past, the plan is
>> to have at least three days full of talks and hacking, so that we all
> Are you proposing something like:
>
> 17 - 21 Talks and hacking
> 24 -
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 9:12 PM, C. Scott Ananian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Ed McNierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> It currently looks like the week of November 17 - 21 is our target for our
>> planning meeting, so as to avoid travel during the (following) US
>
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Ed McNierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It currently looks like the week of November 17 - 21 is our target for our
> planning meeting, so as to avoid travel during the (following) US
> Thanksgiving holiday week. I concur with Scott's suggestion of having a
> sugar
It currently looks like the week of November 17 - 21 is our target for
our planning meeting, so as to avoid travel during the (following) US
Thanksgiving holiday week. I concur with Scott's suggestion of having
a sugarlabs contact connect with SJ to move things forward.
- Ed
On Oct
15 matches
Mail list logo
