On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 02:05:55PM -0400, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
A hand-drawn proposal for what a Journal supporting directory
traversal as well as tag space exploration is in the attached PDF.
Discussion welcome!
I am unable to view this PDF. It appears blank on this end. Would you
On Sep 23, 2008, at 2:05 PM, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
A hand-drawn proposal for what a Journal supporting directory
traversal as well as tag space exploration is in the attached PDF.
Discussion welcome!
FWIW, I made several impassioned proposals for these features -- in
fact, with some visual
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 5:46 PM, Eduardo H. Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scott, I thought you came to the conclusion that there was no use for
ordered tags. What changed your mind? Was it the abilty to browse
hierarchical systems with the Journal? I also thought you came to the
conclusion
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 5:57 PM, Eduardo H. Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah, so that's why you separate these legacy-hierarchical files with a
light grey slash (/) . So that a kid who only knows the Journal
tagging world can ignore it, and users who have know the hierarchical
world can
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 6:05 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
c. scott ananian wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 5:57 PM, Eduardo H. Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Ah, so that's why you separate these legacy-hierarchical files with a
light grey slash (/) . So that a kid who only knows the
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 6:20 PM, Eduardo H. Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I also imagine that the Extra options menu would appear in the main
toolbar in the Detailed view. And aditionally, like in one of eben's
mockup, once a entry is checked in this list view, either the main
toolbar changes
I'm paying attention to this thread, quietly. I like a lot of this.
:) I'll let it continue without interfering, for now, but I wanted to
point out that the new toolbar design (posted on the wiki) would make
that more actions option much nicer. For that matter, as Eduardo
mentions, they don't
c. scott ananian wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 5:57 PM, Eduardo H. Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah, so that's why you separate these legacy-hierarchical files with a
light grey slash (/) . So that a kid who only knows the Journal
tagging world can ignore it, and users who have know
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 6:25 PM, Eben Eliason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm paying attention to this thread, quietly. I like a lot of this.
:) I'll let it continue without interfering, for now, but I wanted to
point out that the new toolbar design (posted on the wiki) would make
that more
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 7:36 PM, Bobby Powers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 6:25 PM, Eben Eliason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm paying attention to this thread, quietly. I like a lot of this.
:) I'll let it continue without interfering, for now, but I wanted to
point out
Scott, I thought you came to the conclusion that there was no use for
ordered tags. What changed your mind? Was it the abilty to browse
hierarchical systems with the Journal? I also thought you came to the
conclusion that turning directory names as tags alone worked. How
would the results be
Ah, so that's why you separate these legacy-hierarchical files with a
light grey slash (/) . So that a kid who only knows the Journal
tagging world can ignore it, and users who have know the hierarchical
world can understand it and make advance usage of that knowledge when
transfering from or
I also imagine that the Extra options menu would appear in the main
toolbar in the Detailed view. And aditionally, like in one of eben's
mockup, once a entry is checked in this list view, either the main
toolbar changes to provide contextual actions (those you placed in
that menu, copy, apply
One extra thing that epiphany has that you didn't explicitelly showed
in your mockup is, as you select/type tags, the most popular and/or
recent section of the tag pane gets related tags thrown into its
mix. Related tags are those which have been applied to objects along
side the typed one(s).
14 matches
Mail list logo
