Erik Garrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 12:40:39AM +0200, Bastien wrote:
It's not that important anyway. It just occurred to me that the
dependancies management challenge could be somehow dealt with by
delivering a set of default activities. I'm not aware of any
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 08:21:34PM +0200, Bastien wrote:
Erik Garrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 12:40:39AM +0200, Bastien wrote:
It's not that important anyway. It just occurred to me that the
dependancies management challenge could be somehow dealt with by
Erik Garrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Maybe what I'm suggesting boils down to integrate this core activities
in the environment so that people installing Sugar won't have to install
them separatly. Just the same way that installing a standard Fedora
will install Gnome (will install
: Monday, July 28, 2008 6:19 PM
To: devel@lists.laptop.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [sugar] specifying what services Activities may use
There was an earlier discussion of how to provide the right build
level for users out in the field, since now Builds can be installed
separately from Activities
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 12:40:39AM +0200, Bastien wrote:
It's not that important anyway. It just occurred to me that the
dependancies management challenge could be somehow dealt with by
delivering a set of default activities. I'm not aware of any
software distribution drawing such a strong
On Tue, 2008-07-29 at 17:09 -0400, Mikus Grinbergs wrote:
Please ensure that you have filed tickets for each and every one of them
What good will that do?
We track issues through trac. Doing it through email is harder when you
have a lot of email and a lot of issues.
Filing a ticket
Bobby Powers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
recent joyrides include an activity updater which should help with this.
And you guys could get rid of the scary red warning on the wiki :)
on which page?
See the barking here:
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Update.1_Software_Release_Notes
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin M. Schwartz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 7:40 PM
To: Jerry Williams
Cc: 'Mikus Grinbergs'; devel@lists.laptop.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [sugar] specifying what services Activities may use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED
On Tue, 2008-07-29 at 15:10 -0400, Mikus Grinbergs wrote:
A DECISION NEEDS TO BE MADE !!!
I've been randomly launching Activities on 2226. __Far too many__
of them fail -- because csound was changed, numeric was changed,
mixer was changed, etc., etc., etc.
Please ensure that you have
Please ensure that you have filed tickets for each and every one of them
What good will that do?
At the beginning of this year, I wrote a ticket saying an Activity
would not start. Without notifying me, someone re-assigned *me* as
the owner of that ticket -- presumably making it my
Hi Mikus,
On 29 Jul 2008, at 22:09, Mikus Grinbergs wrote:
Please ensure that you have filed tickets for each and every one of
them
What good will that do?
At the beginning of this year, I wrote a ticket saying an Activity
would not start. Without notifying me, someone re-assigned *me*
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jerry Williams wrote:
| Seems like this problem for linux was solved with RPM.
| With rpm if something is missing for something you want to install, it
| complains and won't let you install it.
That's not really the problem we're discussing. We're
Benjamin M. Schwartz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jerry Williams wrote:
| Seems like this problem for linux was solved with RPM.
| With rpm if something is missing for something you want to install, it
| complains and won't let you install it.
That's not really the problem we're discussing.
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:03 PM, Bastien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Benjamin M. Schwartz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jerry Williams wrote:
| Seems like this problem for linux was solved with RPM.
| With rpm if something is missing for something you want to install, it
| complains and won't let
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 1:39 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jerry Williams wrote:
| Seems like this problem for linux was solved with RPM.
| With rpm if something is missing for something you want to install, it
| complains and won't let you install it.
That's not really
@lists.laptop.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [sugar] specifying what services Activities may use
There was an earlier discussion of how to provide the right build
level for users out in the field, since now Builds can be installed
separately from Activities -- leading to the possibility that for
someone
16 matches
Mail list logo
