Re: [support-gang] [ANNOUNCE] Sugar Labs Licensing Referendum (non-binding) results

2011-07-13 Thread Luke Faraone
On 07/10/2011 10:23 PM, Gary Martin wrote: > I was surprised as I had no recollection at all of the original email > (subscribed to way too many Sugar related lists), but after some > digging found it had been clobbered as junk email, so not sure who > else this may have hit, but thought it worth m

Re: [Sugar-devel] [support-gang] [ANNOUNCE] Sugar Labs Licensing Referendum (non-binding) results

2011-07-11 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Luke Faraone wrote: > On 07/10/2011 10:23 PM, Gary Martin wrote: > > I was surprised as I had no recollection at all of the original email > > (subscribed to way too many Sugar related lists), but after some > > digging found it had been clobbered as junk email, s

RE: [SoaS] [support-gang] [ANNOUNCE] Sugar Labs Licensing Referendum (non-binding) results

2011-07-11 Thread Caryl Bigenho
pport-gang] [ANNOUNCE] Sugar Labs Licensing Referendum > (non-binding) results > > On 11 July 2011 03:23, Gary Martin wrote: > > Hi Luke, > > > > I was surprised as I had no recollection at all of the original email > > (subscribed to way too many Sugar related

Re: [support-gang] [ANNOUNCE] Sugar Labs Licensing Referendum (non-binding) results

2011-07-11 Thread Gary Martin
Hi Luke, On 11 Jul 2011, at 16:43, Luke Faraone wrote: > On 07/10/2011 10:23 PM, Gary Martin wrote: >> I was surprised as I had no recollection at all of the original email >> (subscribed to way too many Sugar related lists), but after some >> digging found it had been clobbered as junk email, so

Re: [support-gang] [ANNOUNCE] Sugar Labs Licensing Referendum (non-binding) results

2011-07-11 Thread Daniel Drake
On 11 July 2011 03:23, Gary Martin wrote: > Hi Luke, > > I was surprised as I had no recollection at all of the original email > (subscribed to way too many Sugar related lists), but after some digging > found it had been clobbered as junk email, so not sure who else this may have > hit, but th

Re: [Sugar-devel] [support-gang] [ANNOUNCE] Sugar Labs Licensing Referendum (non-binding) results

2011-07-11 Thread Christoph Derndorfer
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Luke Faraone wrote: > On 07/10/2011 10:23 PM, Gary Martin wrote: > > I was surprised as I had no recollection at all of the original email > > (subscribed to way too many Sugar related lists), but after some > > digging found it had been clobbered as junk email, s

Re: [support-gang] [ANNOUNCE] Sugar Labs Licensing Referendum (non-binding) results

2011-07-11 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
Me too :( And with a gmail account too. Gonzalo On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 11:23 PM, Gary Martin wrote: > Hi Luke, > > I was surprised as I had no recollection at all of the original email > (subscribed to way too many Sugar related lists), but after some digging > found it had been clobbered as ju

Re: [support-gang] [ANNOUNCE] Sugar Labs Licensing Referendum (non-binding) results

2011-07-11 Thread Gary Martin
Hi Luke, I was surprised as I had no recollection at all of the original email (subscribed to way too many Sugar related lists), but after some digging found it had been clobbered as junk email, so not sure who else this may have hit, but thought it worth mentioning. Regards, --Gary On 10 Jul