Re: 8.2.0 Release Criteria ECO Documentation (Michael Stone)
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 11:40 PM, Greg Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Hi Michael, I thought of one item we missed in making this checklist. We need to pick the set of activities which we will include in the factory G1G1 image. Can you add that to the check list so we are fully ready to produce this image when its done? Don't the licensing issues with the activities that C. Scott brought up yesterday have to be cleared before this list can be finalized? Or are you talking about a more abstract wishlist here? Regards, Christoph If that decision can come out of synch with the blessing of the core image we can track it elsewhere. I just want to make sure we nail it down soon so we don't have a lot of latency between finalizing the image and getting it shipped on newly manufactured XOs. Thanks, Greg S *** Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:52:17 -0400 From: Michael Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 8.2.0 Release Criteria ECO Documentation To: devel@lists.laptop.org Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed In preparation for shipping an 8.2.0 build to manufacturing, we need to agree on release criteria. To that end, I have stubbed out rough ECO documentation for 8.2.0 at http://wiki.laptop.org/go/ECO/8.2.0 http://wiki.laptop.org/go/ECO/8.2.0/Checklist Please review these pages and offer suggestions on their talk pages so that I can fold your comments into the pages over the next week. So far, the most important changes I have made include: * Stating some of the technical documentation that future stable releases should include and making space for us to try creating that documentation for 8.2.0 at our leisure. * Stating the list of locales and keyboards which I believe must be minimally qualified for 8.2.0. See http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Mstone/Notes/Localization_1 for notes on what I mean by 'release X is qualified for locale Y'. * Created a test item for documentation signoff on the manual and activities signoff on the derivative builds. * Created final test items for release criteria including: 1 week of community testing all recent bugs triaged no 8.2.0 blockers release notes signoff What have I missed? Michael ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel -- Christoph Derndorfer co-editor, olpcnews url: www.olpcnews.com e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: 8.2.0 Release Criteria ECO Documentation (Michael Stone)
Hi Christoph, Not sure if the licensing thing will be a deal breaker for including activities in the manufactured image, but we should definitely get that right ASAP. All I'm saying is that we need to decide which activities to include in the image before they start manufacturing them for sale. I want to make sure that decision gets made early. We should also test those activities with an extra level of focus since we know they will get built in. Better to do that before the release is closed. That's why I think it merits a place on the ECO checklist. Thanks, Greg S Christoph Derndorfer wrote: On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 11:40 PM, Greg Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Hi Michael, I thought of one item we missed in making this checklist. We need to pick the set of activities which we will include in the factory G1G1 image. Can you add that to the check list so we are fully ready to produce this image when its done? Don't the licensing issues with the activities that C. Scott brought up yesterday have to be cleared before this list can be finalized? Or are you talking about a more abstract wishlist here? Regards, Christoph If that decision can come out of synch with the blessing of the core image we can track it elsewhere. I just want to make sure we nail it down soon so we don't have a lot of latency between finalizing the image and getting it shipped on newly manufactured XOs. Thanks, Greg S *** Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:52:17 -0400 From: Michael Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 8.2.0 Release Criteria ECO Documentation To: devel@lists.laptop.org Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed In preparation for shipping an 8.2.0 build to manufacturing, we need to agree on release criteria. To that end, I have stubbed out rough ECO documentation for 8.2.0 at http://wiki.laptop.org/go/ECO/8.2.0 http://wiki.laptop.org/go/ECO/8.2.0/Checklist Please review these pages and offer suggestions on their talk pages so that I can fold your comments into the pages over the next week. So far, the most important changes I have made include: * Stating some of the technical documentation that future stable releases should include and making space for us to try creating that documentation for 8.2.0 at our leisure. * Stating the list of locales and keyboards which I believe must be minimally qualified for 8.2.0. See http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Mstone/Notes/Localization_1 for notes on what I mean by 'release X is qualified for locale Y'. * Created a test item for documentation signoff on the manual and activities signoff on the derivative builds. * Created final test items for release criteria including: 1 week of community testing all recent bugs triaged no 8.2.0 blockers release notes signoff What have I missed? Michael ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: 8.2.0 Release Criteria ECO Documentation (Michael Stone)
Hi, We need to pick the set of activities which we will include in the factory G1G1 image. Can you add that to the check list so we are fully ready to produce this image when its done? I should get my proposal in early, then. :) I'd like us to consider shipping the WikiBrowse English activity (available on the Activities page) with G1G1. - Chris. -- Chris Ball [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
re: 8.2.0 Release Criteria ECO Documentation (Michael Stone)
Hi Michael, I thought of one item we missed in making this checklist. We need to pick the set of activities which we will include in the factory G1G1 image. Can you add that to the check list so we are fully ready to produce this image when its done? If that decision can come out of synch with the blessing of the core image we can track it elsewhere. I just want to make sure we nail it down soon so we don't have a lot of latency between finalizing the image and getting it shipped on newly manufactured XOs. Thanks, Greg S *** Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:52:17 -0400 From: Michael Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 8.2.0 Release Criteria ECO Documentation To: devel@lists.laptop.org Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed In preparation for shipping an 8.2.0 build to manufacturing, we need to agree on release criteria. To that end, I have stubbed out rough ECO documentation for 8.2.0 at http://wiki.laptop.org/go/ECO/8.2.0 http://wiki.laptop.org/go/ECO/8.2.0/Checklist Please review these pages and offer suggestions on their talk pages so that I can fold your comments into the pages over the next week. So far, the most important changes I have made include: * Stating some of the technical documentation that future stable releases should include and making space for us to try creating that documentation for 8.2.0 at our leisure. * Stating the list of locales and keyboards which I believe must be minimally qualified for 8.2.0. See http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Mstone/Notes/Localization_1 for notes on what I mean by 'release X is qualified for locale Y'. * Created a test item for documentation signoff on the manual and activities signoff on the derivative builds. * Created final test items for release criteria including: 1 week of community testing all recent bugs triaged no 8.2.0 blockers release notes signoff What have I missed? Michael ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
8.2.0 Release Criteria ECO Documentation
In preparation for shipping an 8.2.0 build to manufacturing, we need to agree on release criteria. To that end, I have stubbed out rough ECO documentation for 8.2.0 at http://wiki.laptop.org/go/ECO/8.2.0 http://wiki.laptop.org/go/ECO/8.2.0/Checklist Please review these pages and offer suggestions on their talk pages so that I can fold your comments into the pages over the next week. So far, the most important changes I have made include: * Stating some of the technical documentation that future stable releases should include and making space for us to try creating that documentation for 8.2.0 at our leisure. * Stating the list of locales and keyboards which I believe must be minimally qualified for 8.2.0. See http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Mstone/Notes/Localization_1 for notes on what I mean by 'release X is qualified for locale Y'. * Created a test item for documentation signoff on the manual and activities signoff on the derivative builds. * Created final test items for release criteria including: 1 week of community testing all recent bugs triaged no 8.2.0 blockers release notes signoff What have I missed? Michael ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
