ACPI on XO (was: Re: [Techteam] Weekend 10/31)

2008-11-03 Thread Deepak Saxena
[cc:ing devel] My understanding of cpuidle is that it is designed to be fairly CPU/system agnostic with a clean driver interface to allow for tweaking the CPU/SOC idle control. There is even an ARM port [1] but as you will see in that email, the nomenclature for CPU idle states has been heavily

Re: ACPI on XO (was: Re: [Techteam] Weekend 10/31)

2008-11-03 Thread Jordan Crouse
On 03/11/08 09:31 -0800, Deepak Saxena wrote: [cc:ing devel] My understanding of cpuidle is that it is designed to be fairly CPU/system agnostic with a clean driver interface to allow for tweaking the CPU/SOC idle control. There is even an ARM port [1] but as you will see in that email, the

Re: ACPI on XO (was: Re: [Techteam] Weekend 10/31)

2008-11-03 Thread Deepak Saxena
On Nov 03 2008, at 13:41, Jordan Crouse was caught saying: The concept of suspend is muddled greatly with kernel and userspace folks both participating in the discussion and coming at the problem from different directions. As Deepak says, the dream is to put the whole system to sleep on a

Re: ACPI on XO (was: Re: [Techteam] Weekend 10/31)

2008-11-03 Thread Jordan Crouse
On 03/11/08 13:12 -0800, Deepak Saxena wrote: On Nov 03 2008, at 13:41, Jordan Crouse was caught saying: The concept of suspend is muddled greatly with kernel and userspace folks both participating in the discussion and coming at the problem from different directions. As Deepak says, the