On Sat, 2008-08-23 at 21:31 +1000, James Cameron wrote:
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 12:01:07PM +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 1:47 PM, James Cameron [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
...
Btw it's a shame that the python processes are grouped all together. I
wonder if we
I did the following as a basic test for memory usage of various python
modules. I did the test on my computer, a 32-bit Centrino laptop running
ubuntu.
Let's start with the following code:
import gobject
mainloop = gobject.MainLoop()
mainloop.run()
Cost: 1.2MB of memory (1.2MB
On Sun, 24 Aug 2008, Polychronis Ypodimatopoulos wrote:
I did the following as a basic test for memory usage of various python
modules. I did the test on my computer, a 32-bit Centrino laptop running
ubuntu.
Let's start with the following code:
import gobject
mainloop =
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 1:47 PM, James Cameron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I also tried using ps_mem.py to compare memory used by processes, but
the method that ps_mem.py uses has changed as a result of kernel change.
http://dev.laptop.org/~quozl/2008-08-22-ps-mem/ has the samples that I
took,
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 1:47 PM, James Cameron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've 703 and 2311 available to compare. Here's a few things I found.
--
A test to compare available memory by eliminating buffer cache.
Method: boot, wait for UI to be stable, switch to text console, echo 3
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 1:47 PM, James Cameron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I also tried using ps_mem.py to compare memory used by processes, but
the method that ps_mem.py uses has changed as a result of kernel change.
http://dev.laptop.org/~quozl/2008-08-22-ps-mem/ has the samples that I
took,
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 11:36:17AM +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
Which row are you looking at here? In -/+ buffers/cache I get 130368.
This is joyride-2328.
That test was using the free value on the first line, which matches
MemFree in /proc/meminfo. I chose that because I knew that after
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 12:01:07PM +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 1:47 PM, James Cameron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I also tried using ps_mem.py to compare memory used by processes, but
the method that ps_mem.py uses has changed as a result of kernel change.
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 5:16 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cerebro is running there for some reason (I've seen it in another bug
report already). I can't reproduce on a clean 2328 joyride, not sure
if it has been fixed or something weird is going on.
Cerebro is enabled in
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 3:09 PM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 5:16 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cerebro is running there for some reason (I've seen it in another bug
report already). I can't reproduce on a clean 2328 joyride, not sure
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 1:25 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 3:09 PM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 5:16 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cerebro is running there for some reason (I've seen it in
ton van overbeek wrote:
Also idle suspend is enabled again in 2325, while it should be off.
i think this was intentional. now that we're building separate
release (Subject: New release8.2 build 7nn) and joyride streams, idle
suspend was re-enabled in joyride in order to help continue
flushing
Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
6.5 Mib according to ps_mem
You are right, it's enabled in joyride... it's failing for me because
it can't find msh0 (not sure why).
Marco
I filed #8128 to address the memory usage that seems excessive.
I have also disabled cerebro from start-up while this
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008, Ton van Overbeek wrote:
Noticed the following:
After booting with all the joyride activities installed and then running top
on vt2 (no activities running, only journal) joyride-2302 shows 44268k free.
Booting into 708 with the same set of activities shows 82828k free.
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 1:52 PM, Ton van Overbeek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Noticed the following:
After booting with all the joyride activities installed and then running top
on vt2 (no activities running, only journal) joyride-2302 shows 44268k free.
Booting into 708 with the same set of
I've 703 and 2311 available to compare. Here's a few things I found.
--
A test to compare available memory by eliminating buffer cache.
Method: boot, wait for UI to be stable, switch to text console, echo 3
/proc/sys/vm/drop_caches, run free(1) and note the free column, repeat
a few times.
Noticed the following:
After booting with all the joyride activities installed and then running top
on vt2 (no activities running, only journal) joyride-2302 shows 44268k free.
Booting into 708 with the same set of activities shows 82828k free.
Is there a 'min amount of free memory' release
17 matches
Mail list logo
