Re: Bitfrost's P_SERVER_AUTH

2008-05-19 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 6:45 PM, Martin Langhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > are there any further notes about how you intended the P_SERVER_AUTH > stuff to work? Was this envisioned to be an ident-style service that > responds to a crypto challenge (a safe variation of "show you have the > privat

Bitfrost's P_SERVER_AUTH

2008-05-18 Thread Martin Langhoff
Ivan, (or anyone close to the Bitfrost implementation) are there any further notes about how you intended the P_SERVER_AUTH stuff to work? Was this envisioned to be an ident-style service that responds to a crypto challenge (a safe variation of "show you have the private key by signing this token"