2008/6/12 Dennis Gilmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thursday 12 June 2008, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
>> Is the piece we're missing the correlation with koji branches /
>> repository names? I've tried to encourage people to think of a more
>> clever naming scheme, but lacking that I suggest that we na
On Thursday 12 June 2008, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
> Is the piece we're missing the correlation with koji branches /
> repository names? I've tried to encourage people to think of a more
> clever naming scheme, but lacking that I suggest that we name our
> branches according to our stable releases.
Is the piece we're missing the correlation with koji branches /
repository names? I've tried to encourage people to think of a more
clever naming scheme, but lacking that I suggest that we name our
branches according to our stable releases. For example:
olpc8.1 <- repo for 8.1, 8.1.1, 8.1.2, e
On Thursday 12 June 2008, Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi Dennis,
>
>> from your initial email: Stable: Stable builds are specified by
>> their release name (e.g. 8.1.1, 8.2), and the procedure for
>> packages moving from Testing into Stable releases involves the
>> Unscheduled Release P
I think I can see Dennis's confusion about packages moving from F9 to F7,
the initial writeup contains this:
* Stable: Stable builds are specified by their release name (e.g. 8.1.1,
> 8.2), and the procedure for packages moving from Testing into Stable
> releases involves the Unscheduled Release
Hi Dennis,
> from your initial email: Stable: Stable builds are specified by
> their release name (e.g. 8.1.1, 8.2), and the procedure for
> packages moving from Testing into Stable releases involves the
> Unscheduled Release Process:
> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Unscheduled_
On Thursday 12 June 2008, Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi Dennis,
>
>> As i have said previously and repeatedly been ignored (like most of
>> what i say). this process will not work. period. It cant be made
>> to work in the same fashion as Debian because its not Debian.
>> everyone needs
Hi Dennis,
> As i have said previously and repeatedly been ignored (like most of
> what i say). this process will not work. period. It cant be made
> to work in the same fashion as Debian because its not Debian.
> everyone needs to quit trying to fit square pegs into round holes.
On Thursday 12 June 2008, Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At the IRC software meeting yesterday we discussed creating some new
> build streams in preparation for our August "8.2" release. These
> streams were proposed:
>
> * Unstable/Joyride: This will move immediately (well, within a day or
> two)
Looks good to me. Thanks for writing it up.
Kim
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Chris Ball <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At the IRC software meeting yesterday we discussed creating some new
> build streams in preparation for our August "8.2" release. These
> streams were proposed:
>
> *
Hi,
At the IRC software meeting yesterday we discussed creating some new
build streams in preparation for our August "8.2" release. These
streams were proposed:
* Unstable/Joyride: This will move immediately (well, within a day or
two) to be a copy of the "olpc-3" stream, which is a build str
11 matches
Mail list logo
